I give up
-
Content Count
761 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Medals
Everything posted by I give up
-
The problem is all that we can hear is exaclty the sonic cracks and all sound exactly the same, thats the issue. Something like this is what you should have when you are under fire, (taking in consideration all relevant aspects, suck like environment, objects, terrain wheater, wind, etc). We dont have have nothing of this, we just have a copy and past of those "sonic cracks", whatever the situation. https://youtu.be/AoUecMPDg14?t=2m12s https://youtu.be/AoUecMPDg14?t=4m40s Do you feel that you under fire? Where are the impact and the sounds related with bullets flying over your head? Can you hear or feel it? I cant.
-
What I would like to see is some modifications about the sound of the bullet impact. I mean, right now sounds all the same, no matter the surface where the "bullet" is "landing", is just like crack, crack crack .. Would be cool, as a matter of game immersion, to have different sounds according to surfaces or objects where the impacts are being done. Also having some ricochet and wind effects would contribute for the same immersion. Right now and some times is real hard to figure from where the "bullets" are coming, since the weapons sound can be easily mixed with "bullet crack". Here as example of what I'm saying. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=crK5clEQaJw
-
Gatling single fire . . . :D
-
Mate, You are a genius. Working perfectly. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YVlw9tyiy_4 Great mission. Thank You.
-
Ok, thanks. Maybe is related with the build. Do you think it is related with this error? http://i.imgur.com/rjpSvf8.jpg I get this when I get close in these, but with these I usually place a couple of charges and its done
-
All looks cool, nice performance, but how do you disable this? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FtDrA5lPlfc
-
Why i love Arma 2, but Arma 3 makes me meh
I give up replied to thenorwood's topic in ARMA 3 - GENERAL
ARMA 3 concept is ok. But, CSAT does not fit in A3, even more when you use Nato references. To be honest, CSAT does no fit anywhere. All the rest os ok. Btw, A3 concept is not futuristic, in fact belongs to past and a very far one. -
Removal of the 2D editor - why - options are good, workflow slowdown for modders
I give up replied to tortuosit's topic in ARMA 3 - EDEN EDITOR
Nah, 2D editor will not be removed. I dont believe in it. 3D editor as the name indicates is 3D, so is like we are in game, means that our machine is working at full speed (at least mine is and eating 1000W). I don't believe there is the intention to force people, who spend hours in editor (like me), having the machine acting as if we are in game. Just does not make sense. Editor as the name indicates is for edting, not some tool for renderization. If that is true, it means the death of editor (and editing) for me. Btw, 3D editor is great and very usefull, but is not a substitute for 2D editor. -
The new sound is just amazing, now the weapons sound like weapons. Hope we can keep it. Just need some tweaking about levels, all the rest is perfect. Thank you for bringing it back.
-
Yep. its a AMD issue. https://youtu.be/y7v-P1XhYnY And DX9 sucks https://youtu.be/UwGIg-5pMxI
-
No mate. This issue It is in fact related with AMD gpu's. And it is because Multi-GPUs are not supported on OpenCL 2.0, which is the version provided by the current Catalyst and since shadows are a bit heavy on ARMA 3 it gives a huge performance loss. Here is the evidence, with CrossFireX disabled. No issues at all. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfPPlLwtIRw Without doubts, Nvidia performs better with ARMA 3.
-
Well, shadows are the fps killer, in my end. I've tried with everthing maxed (Ultra/8xAA) and with shadows disabled and basically there are no performance issues. With shadows in Low I have the same perfromance drop that I have with settings in High/4xAA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aLn4htOnWGU Starting to think it's related with AMD gpu's only and is also related with the known issues with LOD transition that these gpu's have under DX11.
-
Are you sure mate? Its Low and Normal? I am having exactly the same fps with shadows in High, Very High and Ultra. Means I am losing 45 fps whatever the quality preset, when comparing to having shadows disabled. Take a look. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a8q0SEBoB14&feature=youtu.be Are you sure its Low and Normal?
-
Well mate. already figured what are the mine issues with performance. Shadows, mainly shadow transition. In these circumstances with shadows Disabled I have 75 fps (minimum), with shadows in Low i have 30 fps (minimum). Thats a 45 fps loss. Only changed the shadows from Disabled to Low, all the other graphics settings remain the same. Take a look. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kySXA9S33DU Now, how this nasty performance impact is related with "cpu bottleneck"? In my book is related with graphics.
-
With all respect for the videos and opinions, these are bit outdated. At time of the videos ARMA 3 performance was better. Now is like this. Everything maxed at 4K VD. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5GLKuvP0ar8 Btw, 12.5 GB of RAM loaded (pagefile disabled). But I would not worry to much about hardware, because soon we face gameplay, hardware does not count. Nice frames on Paros with Editor. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m_IiiYB7QiY Nasty frames in Paros playing Pilgrimage. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R_jzGljfKwE
-
What are the general goals of the simulator Arma 3?
I give up replied to rap36's topic in ARMA 3 - GENERAL
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pPL_v_c72OA Hope is under your requirements. -
Totally true. And if we choose to use a local account is the same. I got strange results with clean install using a local account. I killed all I could find that could be an automated process. Updates disabled, defender disabled, all automated tasks disabled such, restore, defrag, clean, shadow copies, search, memory and disk health check, performance, software protection, etc (all these were killed and all the process related, even the hidden ones). All processes related with location (aka cortana), all stopped and killed. All the automated tasks in task scheduler were removed and the process killed. Basically all that could be an automated process was killed. Installed a couple of tools (basically disk and network activity monitoring) and I left the machine alone. After a couple of days I could find that the hard drive was having periodic activity (sometimes quite intense for CPU and for some time), also the network activity (and traffic usage) in these periods was quite intense. When I tried to find which process was causing such activity, there was none, clean like a baby sleeping. The same for network activity, there was no traces from to where my machine was being connected. This is reason enough for not wanting DX12, to me. I am old fashion.
-
Where did I say that Nvidia is better hardware? This is what I've said: "For ARMA 3, Nvidia performs much better than AMD (I know because I have both)." Now where, is your doubt? Btw, 30 years is too much for me, my first Nvidia was MX440, which was beast at time.
-
For ARMA 3, Nvidia performs much better than AMD (I know because I have both). Also, Intel is better for ARMA 3 (and games in general).
-
Wish we had DX9 instead of DX11. DX9 can do everything of what we have with DX11 and with the same quality but with better performance. I have one game in my Steam that I played a few years ago (Spec Ops - The Line) based on UE3/DX9, the game is not my kind mainly because is third person (the storyline is great), but the graphics are better than most of DX11 based games. I have no doubts that, for a game like ARMA 3, DX9 would be the best.
-
http://store.steampowered.com/app/228880/ Try it mate, Btw, Recommended: OS: 64-bit Windows 10 Processor: Intel Core i5 or Equivalent Memory: 16 GB RAM Graphics: 4 GB DirectX 12 (Nvidia GTX 970 or AMD R9 390 Equivalent) Video Card DirectX: Version 12 I've also played this one: http://store.steampowered.com/app/393380/ Give both a try and say what you think about hardware usage, hardware demand and cpu/gpu efficiency.
-
Well, like I have said several times, DX12 is a marketing campaign to force people to get Windows 10. Last 6 months I have been using Windows 10, mainly because DX12. I've tried several applications under DX12 and honestly none of them justify the spyware that I have been forced to tolerate. After killing cortana and her friends, after killing all forms (that I could find) of spyware provided by Windows 10, everytime time I left my machine alone I have found it communicating with Microsoft. DX12 is not enough, I need much more to make me lose my privacy. I am back to Windows 7, but it's amazing what Microsoft can do to force Windows 10. In the past I could get all updates for Windows 7 in a matter of minutes, now it takes 3 days (or more). Just amazing. Vulkan is independent, Vulkan does not have such things, that's reason enough to support it. Even more when there is benefit for everyone.
-
And Nvidia. ARMA 3 is powered by Nvidia (graphically speaking) I can't find a reason to not look at it. For AMD anything is better than DX11..
-
For those who still believe in DX12 miracle in matters of performance, I suggest taking a look at this: http://www.techspot.com/review/1081-dx11-vs-dx12-ashes/ I cant see the widely claimed improvements about performance, and you?
-
Mate Mate, there is no error on memory load. If you have 32Gb of RAN and with pagefile diasbled, it loads easily 16 GB. With PageFile enabled, you need to count your pagefile load as if was RAM.
