Erius

Have you not played anything released for PC in the last 4 years? They is almost nothing but bug ridden messes when they first get released. These days games are either polished and bland or impressive but buggy. I prefer the latter as it is generally fixed in due time.

I am trying to set up a shooting range for training that has stationary unkillable soldiers set at different distances. I am wondering how I could set the "targets" up so that they report to side chat each time they get hit.

No fixed wing aircraft are in the demo.

I think stating that the game running at 40 fps is unplayable is fairly ridiculous. And also Recommended settings for a game is not the specs required to run at max graphics, it's the minimum required to play the game effectively where as minimum is the base required to run the game at all. But there does seem to be some compatibility issues with drivers or some certain hardware, as for the lower end of computers I have Arma 2 running fine on my break computer at work which is an iMac with dual core intel @ 2.66ghz, 2gb of ram, and a radeon 2600HD mobile.

I wasn't talking about adjustable sights, I was talking about Ace mod as a whole's affect on performance.

It would be nice to have alot of the features patched into the official game, as I know that on some peoples computers Ace for Arma 1 almost cut their frame rate in half.

It wasn't supposed to be until the 30th in EU I believe.

Look up a few posts, install the latest DX9.

Lynch Him!

Freedom of speech does not apply to privately owned international forums. And say that in public around people you don't know and see what happens. Not to mention it's obvious you were trying to say something by being redundant.

Would it be possible to get a conversion over to thrust based throttle instead of velocity based?