Violence mars Afghan football match

[jaxx 0]

No, just Afghan hooligans.

http://www.cnn.com/2002....ex.html

[red oct 2]

man when i hear football i think of the american sport, i completely forget that in europe football is soccer.

[Charlie_McSheenie 1]

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Red Oct @ Feb. 15 2002,21:41)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">man when i hear football i think of the american sport, i completely forget that in europe football is soccer.<span id='postcolor'>

''soccer'' isn't just europe, its south america, middle east, asia....

europeans are the best though, i mean, manchester united are a european team, and england is in europe (so is holland)

[Damage Inc 0]

I always think about soccer when I hear the word football

[Charlie_McSheenie 1]

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Damage Inc @ Feb. 15 2002,21:46)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">I always think about soccer when I hear the word football <span id='postcolor'>

Whenever i hear the word football i think of football (or ''soccer'')

[Damage Inc 0]

Well it would have been confusing if I had said "I always think about football when I hear the word football", don't you think?

[jaxx 0]

I think all-y'all-r-nuts.

[Damage Inc 0]

You're really sucking up to Hilandor by quoting him in your sig

[jaxx 0]

He's my hero. He ought to be yours too. If you know what's good for you!

[nordin dk 0]

*cough* brownnose *cough*

[red oct 2]

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Ruskie @ Feb. 15 2002,21:46)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">man when i hear football i think of the american sport, i completely forget that in europe football is soccer.<span id='postcolor'>

''soccer'' isn't just europe, its south america, middle east, asia....

europeans are the best though, i mean, manchester united are a european team, and england is in europe (so is holland)<span id='postcolor'>

i always thought brazil was the best

[Damage Inc 0]

No France is the best, they are the reigning world champions.

[Thehamster 0]

Naaa Mexico are the best for a reason I can't think of.

[Damage Inc 0]

Well I think San Marino rules.

[R. Gerschwarzenge 0]

Football shouldn't be called soccer. After all football is played with feet.  

[R. Gerschwarzenge 0]

And ball is round, right? So the popular American sport should be called 'armpitmelon' or 'handmelon'.

[Charlie_McSheenie 1]

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Red Oct @ Feb. 16 2002,00:05)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">man when i hear football i think of the american sport, i completely forget that in europe football is soccer.<span id='postcolor'>

''soccer'' isn't just europe, its south america, middle east, asia....

europeans are the best though, i mean, manchester united are a european team, and england is in europe (so is holland)<span id='postcolor'>

i always thought brazil was the best<span id='postcolor'>

brazil have some good players like elber and ronaldo, but imho holland have the best strikers, and england the best midfielders.

and man utd are the best anyway

[nordin dk 0]

lol

And 'soccer' should really be called

foot-and-head-and-torso-ball

[Decimus 2]

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (R. Gerschwarzenge @ Feb. 15 2002,16:23)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">And ball is round, right? So the popular American sport should be called 'armpitmelon' or 'handmelon'.   <span id='postcolor'>

I think you need to look up your definition of round. An American football is round but not spheroid.

[Charlie_McSheenie 1]

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Decimus @ Feb. 16 2002,00:33)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">And ball is round, right? So the popular American sport should be called 'armpitmelon' or 'handmelon'.   <span id='postcolor'>

I think you need to look up your definition of round.  An American football is round but not spheroid.<span id='postcolor'>

Its the same shape as a rugby ball so it'd make sense to call it rubgy something.

[R. Gerschwarzenge 0]

OK Mr. Nitpick.  

And ball is spheroid, right?...

[Decimus 2]

Yes, a ball is a 3-deminsional circle, or sphere. While a football is elliptical.

[nordin dk 0]

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">brazil have some good players like elber and ronaldo, but imho holland have the best strikers, and england the best midfielders.

and man utd are the best anyway <span id='postcolor'>

Elber? Is he still around?

What about Rivaldo and Roberto Carlos, don't they count for anything?

And this guy, Mario Jardel

Look at his scoring stats:

First Division 2001/2002 Sporting Lisbon 27

First Division 2000/2001 Galatasaray     22  

First Division 1999/2000 Porto   29

First Division 1998/1999 Porto   36  

First Division 1997/1998 Porto   26  

First Division 1996/1997 Porto   30

Unbe-f*ucking-lievable

[R. Gerschwarzenge 0]

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Decimus @ Feb. 16 2002,01:41)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Yes, a ball is a 3-deminsional circle, or sphere.  While a football is elliptical. <span id='postcolor'>

If a ball is a spheroid then how can a football be elliptical?

Your own equation doesn't make sence.

[Charlie_McSheenie 1]

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">brazil have some good players like elber and ronaldo, but imho holland have the best strikers, and england the best midfielders.

and man utd are the best anyway <span id='postcolor'>

Elber? Is he still around?

What about Rivaldo and Roberto Carlos, don't they count for anything?

And this guy, Mario Jardel

Look at his scoring stats:

First Division 2001/2002 Sporting Lisbon 27

First Division 2000/2001 Galatasaray     22  

First Division 1999/2000 Porto   29

First Division 1998/1999 Porto   36  

First Division 1997/1998 Porto   26  

First Division 1996/1997 Porto   30

Unbe-f*ucking-lievable<span id='postcolor'>

as far as i know he is. i haven't seen his stats in a while though cos i don't follow any other leagues except for the premiership much anymore, i sometimes watch the spanish, italian and dutch leagues but if i want to i have to watch german tv occasionally which is a bit dodgy. He's only 28 if i remember correctly so i reckon he will be. if he hasn't been transferred i think he's playing for bayern munchen, but i haven't looked in ages.

Rivaldo i have to admit i forgot about last time i saw him (which admittedly was fooking ages ago, can't even remember where) he was doing some snazzy dribbling and crossing.

I checked out that jardel guy and he is pretty class as far as stats go anyway.

I suppose i'm a bit partial to dutch strikers since nistelrooy is doing so well for man utd