red oct 2 Posted February 6, 2002 i think they are all sexy Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
WisdoM 1 Posted February 6, 2002 I dont know about the rest of you, but I prefer women Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Silencer 0 Posted February 6, 2002 I like to watch porn than airplanes... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Assault (CAN) 1 Posted February 6, 2002 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">I dont know about the rest of you, but I prefer women<span id='postcolor'> Me too, but I voted for the Huey! Tyler Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Thehamster 0 Posted February 6, 2002 Me thinks this topic is really pointless. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
red oct 2 Posted February 6, 2002 than dont read it Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Thehamster 0 Posted February 6, 2002 I had to read it to form the opinion that it was a pointless topic. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DVII 0 Posted February 6, 2002 Wow a useless topic, gotta react quickly! I voted for C-130, Belgian airforce uses them and i see them every day. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rogue2020 0 Posted February 7, 2002 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Murda Inc @ Feb. 06 2002,09:34)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">I dont know about the rest of you, but I prefer women <span id='postcolor'> Here here.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
christophercles 0 Posted February 7, 2002 i voted for the blackhawk. Awwwww yeah...... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gorgi Knootewoot 0 Posted February 7, 2002 I votes for the ofsprey, but i think you meant Osprey Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
daniel barnett 0 Posted February 8, 2002 no the ofsprey is a classified veichle designed soley 2 combat soldiers with lisps Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Albert Schweitzer 10 Posted February 8, 2002 Vehicules and airplanes can be sexy indeed. If you dont get this than it is no wonder that only the Italians and the Germans build beautiful cars. Engineers need to love what they are doing, and this you will see once their product is finished. If this love is missing and the engineer just does his job then you get a car like the Korean Daewoo or a plane like the RF-5E TigerEye ( I still like very much the old A-6 Intruder) what a fucking ugly plane Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Supah 0 Posted February 8, 2002 Sorry albert u may very well be a famous tropical explorer but ur opinion sucks IMHO. The german build the Tornado together with the italians and the British. It turned out to be the stupid ppl choicein fighter aviation. Unamnoucvarable, UGLY AS SIN, and weak. If 10 tornado's take of from leeuwarden Airbase (which i live near) 4 come back before they even reach the targeting range because of mechanical defects. There are targeting ranges on the frisian islands. The onlyu aircraft which routinly land at leeuwarden cuz they have failures are tornado's. The last 8!!!! aircraft to have crashed there were tornado's. Its crap, it was designed by germans and italians and brits (who have a saving grace for making the EE Lightning, can u spell cooooooooooool) so that opinion dont fly (like the tornado). Id have the F-5 any day, at least it resembles a aircraft not a brick like the tornado. (pls note that i have nothing against the germans/italians/british in general i like them allot just ppl qouting that ther nation designs prety planes when the have a monstrosity like the tornado on their consience) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ACT SMILEY 0 Posted February 9, 2002 Ahhh yes. The Tornado. For once, we can't blame the French. Lets blame the Italians Its not ALL bad, just mostly. Especially when used at low altitudes like in the Gulf. The ground attack version is pointless when we have Jaguars. As for the tornado's looks, its not too bad, but its performance is a bit shite. The Lightning was pretty good. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Posted February 9, 2002 F-14 D(?) TomCat all the way! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Damage Inc 0 Posted February 9, 2002 It said non attack aircraft. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Albert Schweitzer 10 Posted February 9, 2002 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (supah @ Feb. 08 2002,23:21)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Sorry albert u may very well be a famous tropical explorer but ur opinion sucks IMHO. The german build the Tornado together with the italians and the British. It turned out to be the stupid ppl choicein fighter aviation. Unamnoucvarable, UGLY AS SIN, and weak. If 10 tornado's take of from leeuwarden Airbase (which i live near) 4 come back before they even reach the targeting range because of mechanical defects. There are targeting ranges on the frisian islands. The onlyu aircraft which routinly land at leeuwarden cuz they have failures are tornado's. The last 8!!!! aircraft to have crashed there were tornado's. Its crap, it was designed by germans and italians and brits (who have a saving grace for making the EE Lightning, can u spell cooooooooooool) so that opinion dont fly (like the tornado). Â Id have the F-5 any day, at least it resembles a aircraft not a brick like the tornado. (pls note that i have nothing against the germans/italians/british in general i like them allot just ppl qouting that ther nation designs prety planes when the have a monstrosity like the tornado on their consience)<span id='postcolor'> Yeah, I agree, I was more talking about cars though. But since this thread is about planes I need to reply to that (obligatory). The Tornado is not, a hyper-ugly plane. It may not be beautiful, there I agree. But what do you expect when you got an international cooperation! What you can expect is a crossover of different styles. As for the Tornado that would mean Schnitzel with Mozarella and Mint Sauce. What can you expect from that? My comment was rather about: can planes be sexy. And my statement was: Yes, even (or maybe especially) if they dont wear bombs and guns ! Wheter you like German-engineering or not doesnt change much about it! (and eh, the Eurofighter is gonna be goddamm ugly too, be prepared) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Supah 0 Posted February 9, 2002 Again i disagree .... i find the eurofighter quite goodlooking. Now the JSF that the netherlands may buy .... there is ugly for you I do however think that the JSF will be the better aircraft though. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Posted February 9, 2002 Eurofighter sucks, Joint Strike Fighter rules . Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
daniel barnett 0 Posted February 9, 2002 stealth fighter is sexy! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Thehamster 0 Posted February 9, 2002 I always liked the B52 bomber. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nordin dk 0 Posted February 10, 2002 Boeing 747, reminds me of my ex... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Assault (CAN) 1 Posted February 10, 2002 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">It said non attack aircraft.<span id='postcolor'> The F-14D Tomcat is not an attack aircraft, it's a fighter aircraft, hence the "F" designation. The Grippen is a COOL plane: Don't diss the JSF!, lol: The KA-50 is a mean mofo too: Tyler Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
