Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
OntosMk1

Need period ussr fast attack planes..

Recommended Posts

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (NAA_Us_Marine @ Mar. 15 2003,10:15)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Actually ur theory shash has nothing to do with why they made the SU-27 for a bigger mig 29... have u ever thought about loadouts.<span id='postcolor'>

What are you talking about?? I was correcting him! confused.gif

I know the differences between a Flanker and a Fulcrum wink.giftounge.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I thougt the SU-25 was used in Afghanistan... but i guess that's just me....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is the double cheese burger basicly a bigger cheese burger? some may say yes, because some people want more of a good thing, and others might say, no its a totaly new one because better and bigger, and it even has its own name and its own spot in the menu.

The Su-27 is a new plane yes, but its basicly a bigger Mig-29. The russian governemtn wanted Sukhoi to design an aircraft with same capabilities as the mig-29 yet fill in its weaknesses. Like short range, poor radar and limited loadouts. The mig-29 and Su-27 have virtualy a perfectly identical aerodynamic properties. They both escape a flat spin by letting go of the stick. so thats enough to tell you that their extremyl close.

The Su-27 might seem better, yet its weak in many areas that the mig-29 excells in. If your interested in knowing why, read this page:

http://www.acig.org/artman/publish/article_27.shtml

cheers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I suggest you read "Sukhoi SU-27 Flanker" by Yefim Gordon... 178 pages of very informative content covering EVERYTHING SU-27 related smile.gif A good book

The SU-27 has a similar wing loading to the MIG-29, higher thrust to weight ratio, better range, better engines than the MiG-29 (then again a Trabant has better engines than the MiG-29), and more capable avionics, can carry more weapons and deliver them with greater accuracy.

But never mind, I like it so I'll keep on argueing..lol...we'll just have to agree to differ

 biggrin.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

looks like you didn;t read the article to get the point. And my point too, maybe i frogot to tell you that the Su-27 is by far my favourite fighter ever, and Mekhail Simonov is one of my heros. I gues you know who this guy is.

A line from the article "The Su-27, on the contrary, can be seen as a kind of a further development of the MiG-29, and is at best described as a flying SAM-site."

I love the Su-27 as much as you,and im not saying that its a bad airplane, or the mig-29 is better. It has the bad things, but i love it for the good things.

cheers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hope it gets released soon dead, it looks good from the screens I've seen smile.gif

And just to let you all know, I am going to ask deadsoldier about implementing a nuclear bomb using the new burning effect on an F-15E update.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Shash thats funny i am actually working on a plastic model of that same mig 29 you posted pics of. the plastic model is made by revell you could get it at ur local hobby store smile.gif

we were thinking of doing that scheme we may and we may not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×