cybercoco 16 Posted December 27, 2015 I'm sure there's a way to minimize the number of lines in this code. I have three variables, each of them needs to get through a simple math function : f(x)=10x. _var1 = 0.2; _var2 = 0.7; _var3 = 0.5; _array = [_var1,_var2,_var3]; _var1 = _var1 * 10; _var2 = _var2 * 10; _var3 = _var3 * 10; If I have let say ten vars, is it better to use the brute way (see snip above), use a foreach command or use a function (optimization wise). Probably the function, isn't it ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
R3vo 2654 Posted December 27, 2015 Use forEach and push the results back into an array. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cybercoco 16 Posted December 27, 2015 Ok thanks, also another thing : if I use a function and I want to output the result. Should I do _varProcessed = _varUnprocessed call _fnc_processor; // and then hint format ["%1",_varProcessed]; or simply hint format ["%1",_varUnprocessed call _fnc_processor]; Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
R3vo 2654 Posted December 27, 2015 Doesn't really matter, only difference is that the first example is easier on the eyes. What's all that stuff about reduceing lines anyways? The performance gain is negligible and local variables become nil after the script has run. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cybercoco 16 Posted December 27, 2015 Doesn't really matter, only difference is that the first example is easier on the eyes. What's all that stuff about reduceing lines anyways? The performance gain is negligible and local variables become nil after the script has run. I am preoccupied with that and making the code lighter and smaller, but I realise, like you said, that it doesn't matter. Thanks for the help ;) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Heeeere's johnny! 51 Posted January 1, 2016 Doesn't really matter, only difference is that the first example is easier on the eyes. What's all that stuff about reduceing lines anyways? The performance gain is negligible and local variables become nil after the script has run. I wouldn't be that quick with a judgement like that. For scripts which are run only once in a while, I'd agree. But think about scripts which run waitUntil or while loops or which run onEachFrame, probably even with rather complex code inside. Producing unnecessary variables and operations may at some point impact the game's fluency. I personally do not assign local variables if the operation is easily readable and I would use the variable only once. So as per cybercoco's example, I prefer latter: hint format ["%1",_varUnprocessed call _fnc_processor]; And reducing lines of code to reduce redundance is simply senseful, because you only have to maintain the respective code in one place rather than in many. That's one of the main reasons why functions were invented. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cybercoco 16 Posted January 1, 2016 Thank you Heeeere's johnny! for your reply Share this post Link to post Share on other sites