Bad fps on multiplayer good in single player

[snipernosnipingp 1]

ok so here my rig

I7 3770 3.9ghz Gtx 670 4gb ftw edition

Internet speeds Download: 4.68 Upload: 1.47

Hard drive write speed (operation arrowhead folder 86mb/s)

average fps 30 :(

People with lesser or the smae rigs get better fps than this.

Other games average fps

Cod black ops 2(Highest settings) : 100 fps

Chivalry(Highest Settings) : 60 (i think there is an fps cap)

I dont know how to fix this please help

Settings : http://i.imgur.com/gju8byR.jpg

Benchmark 1 : http://i.imgur.com/UONT8gw.png

Benchmark 2 : http://i.imgur.com/SezJcBl.png

Benchmark 3 : http://i.imgur.com/GUTMQqR.png

These are in the order that you an play them in going from chernarus to the extreme one to the takistan one

[Horner 13]

Ofc you get less FPS on multiplayer, especially if you're locally hosting. All the networking may take a toll on your FPS. It also depends what mission. I usually get 50 FPS in a simple editor mission where I just drive or fly around, but in something like Domination, Warfare or Wasteland that has a lot of code running and a lot of other players I'm lucky if I get 20-30.

Look into some launch params, you can specify how many CPUs arma uses and the maximum memory usage. You can also specify maximum VRAM, which may help in your case.

http://community.bistudio.com/wiki/Arma2:_Startup_Parameters

[iceman77 19]

I think alot of people would regard 30fps in an occupied server, to be pretty dang good. Especially on the scenarios horner pointed out. You just can't compare all of those apples to the one ornage (arma). Arma is special :)

[On_Sabbatical 11]

Yes,everything in arma is calculated in real time ..it's totally normal for complex missions !