Jump to content

LSD_Timewarp82

Member
  • Content Count

    1596
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Medals

  • Medals

Everything posted by LSD_Timewarp82

  1. LSD_Timewarp82

    Low CPU utilization & Low FPS

    Cause i am clever and i have eyes in my head ;)
  2. LSD_Timewarp82

    Low CPU utilization & Low FPS

    I think Nuno Basto is the guy which talking in the YT-video. That one was easy. Next.
  3. Ok cool, will try it in a few minutes. Thx man
  4. LSD_Timewarp82

    Low CPU utilization & Low FPS

    When i read that since Arma 2 are Performance problems present i would not be very optimistic. But wonders happens. Sometimes.
  5. I ll try now the version from yesterday. Still have the wierd fps-issue, only on this mission. I tested it in editor with the A3 Mappack and my usual Altis without WLA, there was no drops to 1 frame. It´s really strange
  6. I bet he register only for this sentence^^
  7. LSD_Timewarp82

    Low CPU utilization & Low FPS

    i didnt blame anyone, i already told that Arma is a fantastic game (i got over 2200hours on Steam just for Arma3) and its too sad that the performance isnt higher. I didnt know very much about the Engine you guys are using but it seems the engine is hard to tweak for you devs. Otherwise a dev should imagine how a player see this situation, release is a while ago, tons of patches and fixes were released, but performance stays the same or is getting lower. Even with very expensive pc´s you wont be able to get constantly legit frames, maybe with low details, but i have a good pc and low details are no option for me. I still hope and pray that this performance will raise someday :)
  8. LSD_Timewarp82

    Low CPU utilization & Low FPS

    Lol, 1-3 fps are just ridicolous. Unbelivable...
  9. Whats the "added startup option cinema background" ?
  10. Someone know how i can get rid of the Message "TPW LOS already running" after Load a savegame? I use moduload for this, but the message didnt disappear after then
  11. LSD_Timewarp82

    Low CPU utilization & Low FPS

    The only thing what i didnt understand is that how other devs are able to increase the performance for games driver to driver, yes that thing what till today never happened in Arma. Arma would be so fantastic with legitable frames, just to think about if it would run with 50-60fps constantly, man that would be great... But thank god they fixing helmets for Soldiers in mission xy...
  12. LSD_Timewarp82

    Low CPU utilization & Low FPS

    lol, sure Bottleneck^^ i7 @4,2Ghz is a bottleneck for sure :rolleyes: I can go up to 5200Mhz, but for this i need to setup my good old MachII GT from my basement. But i wont do it, not in mood for that. But to stay on topic: yes really wierd that Arma is really a game which doesnt have a noticable performance increase at all. Thats why i mentioned that the devs "should" start to work on this crappy (sorry, but i cant say it otherwise) Engine
  13. LSD_Timewarp82

    Low CPU utilization & Low FPS

    It´s no offense, its just my opinion they had to start to optimize the engine a long time ago...
  14. LSD_Timewarp82

    Low CPU utilization & Low FPS

    I think the devs should stop fixing unneccessary things like controls of vehicles and other not needed stuff. First the player should have an acceptable performance, then u can adjust controls of vehicles and soldiers. I dont need good control when my frames go into basement. Yesterdays Driver 337.50 performs very good in a lot of games, of course in Arma not. Here are some quick benches of the 337.50 Nv Driver StarSwarm Demo , 1920x1080 , Follow , Extreme (5 Runs Average) R335.23 WHQL ~43.73fps R337.50 Beta ~64.24fps ( +46,9 Percent ) ------------------------------------------- Hitman Absolution "Internal-Benchmark" , 1920x1080 , FXAA , Ultra Details , DirectX 11 58,4fps vs. 81,8fps +40 Percent ----------------------------------------------------------- Battlefield3 "Strike of Karkand" 1920x1080 , 4xMSAA , Ultra Details , DirectX 11 76fps vs. 106fps +39,5Percent ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Battlefield4 "Siege of Shanghai" 1920x1080 , Medium Details , DirectX 11 122fps vs. 155fps +27 Percent ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- THIEF "Internal-Benchmark" , 1920x1080 , FXAA , Maximum Details , DirectX 11 80,5fps vs. 93,1fps +15,6 Percent ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Arma 3 = 0% That is so ridiculous.... I am highly disappointed...
  15. LSD_Timewarp82

    Low CPU utilization & Low FPS

    Fact is: the performance is a shame. And the Graphics which i see related to frames must be a kind of joke. Thats my opinion
  16. LSD_Timewarp82

    Low CPU utilization & Low FPS

    Today was Nvidias new driver released which gives major fps gain in most games (39,8% more FPS on BF4 on 64Player Match/ FullHD+Ultra) FPS Gain in Arma3: 0% hahahahahahaa this is so extreme annoying, unbelievable!
  17. Did u use bCombat AI mod? If yes then tell me, i know how to get work with bCombat and WLA ;)
  18. LSD_Timewarp82

    Low CPU utilization & Low FPS

    Yup, thats Arma ^^ My system is in my signature, struggles too. Seems legit!
  19. Arrrgh, why now when i should go to bed cause work tomorrow^^ I´ll give it a short try, just to test the new features. Thx man
  20. LSD_Timewarp82

    Low CPU utilization & Low FPS

    Its always worth a try. But in Arma very often it stays at a try and no success ^^
  21. Hmm, still have no HUD with the latest version.. Did i need special googles? ^^
  22. LSD_Timewarp82

    Low CPU utilization & Low FPS

    Who cares man... Open your eyes, yes it is my personal experience. I did a bunch of tests and benches, why should other users gain fps when it didnt work on my and other systems. Or is the based on that what you feel when you look on the screen without measuring? ^^
  23. LSD_Timewarp82

    Low CPU utilization & Low FPS

    Well, i benched with and w/o core parking... Performance gain: 0%
  24. LSD_Timewarp82

    Low CPU utilization & Low FPS

    I belive he is right, i couldnt measure any improvement with this. Parameters like "exthreads" or "maxmem" are useless and didnt do anything.
×