Fulcrum90

Awesome. And such high quality. Nice to see ArmA II still gets more and better addon than ArmA III!

Many, many thanks. I hope my email didnt annoy you. And yeah, your plane and its feature are still among the best available for ArmA. Nice to hear we can enjoy them via ACE, wasnt aware of that. If you can find the time I think many non-ACE users would appreciate a port, even if its just a "quick & dirty one", but even if not I want to thank you for replying and clearing things up.

Its the contact displayed on his dev-heaven account - Which I linked before, but couldnt be opened evertrg87. Want to remove his dev-heaven account to, hm? Next time check before you act. EDIT: Oh and if users hadn't "spammed" (meaning: sending polite emails, just like I did), neither of these two addons would exist: http://www.armaholic.com/page.php?id=12278&highlight=MIG-15 + http://www.armaholic.com/page.php?id=14518&highlight=VF-1S

removed Send him a message...If enough people do it, maybe hell respond.

Hi! (Im the one who made that screenshot) The problem with this plane is that it was NOT made for ArmA 2 - But for ArmA 1. Therefore it has this texture error. It can only be solved by Aushilfe himself, however he is no longer active in this community. Really a shame, but thats the way it is. EDIT: Apparently he might still be here...Found some infos on some German forums. If enough people beg him, maybe he will update his Addon for ArmA 2. It would really be awesome, since his Su-30 is still one of the most impressive addons out there. Brilliant 3D model, perfect textures, and of course some very impressive scripts. (For example you can switch between two MFDs which display accurate weapons status). It worked for the VF-1S Valkyrie and the MiG-15 too. Both were ArmA 1 addons that got ported after several people begged and wrote the original authors. Here is his email (From Dev.Heaven): https://dev-heaven.net/users/52 And here is his beautiful jet: http://s7.directupload.net/images/131123/zo5b54f9.jpg

Hello One thing that always struck me as odd was the lack of SAM sites in the ArmA series. Surface-to-Air Missile batteries are one the most prominent targets in any real-life conflict, no matter if Vietnam or Syria. However in ArmA they were never present. I know especially in Operation Flashpoint the scale of combat was much smaller and therefore long-range weapons like SAMs wouldnt have made much sense (we got the Shilka instead), but since ArmA 2 and especially ArmA 3 I find it curious that such an obvious military factor gets left out.

I was disappointed with ArmA 3, and returned to ArmA 2 very quickly. On our servers we receive a huge influx of players who feel the same.

Sorry for digging up this old thread, but I have a strange tracer-bug occuring with this addon. The Vulcans are basically shooting cherry-bonbons: However another addon, the ZSU-23 that comes with the SA-6 pack, shoots lemons: http://s1.directupload.net/images/131103/sgy2ebcf.jpg Any ideas? I think another addon is to blame, but I cant figure out which. Only one that comes to mind is WarFX by Blastcore, but I removed it and still bonbons :(

Am I the only one having untextured AIM-9 Sidewinders? Link of the error message: http://s14.directupload.net/images/131029/gy7b4xg7.jpg Apparently its the AIM-7 Sparrow...But the A-10 etc. use Sidewinders.

There is literally a complete ArmA 2 game about it, Iron Front O_o But yeah sure, let Vilas make ANOTHER mod about the same topic -_-

ArmA 3 has enough content. Its just that ArmA 2 had too much content. ArmA 3 is running fine. Its just that Arma 2 was running too good. ArmA 3 has distinctive enough factions. Its just ArmA 2's factions were too distinctive. Are we really going to argue in that direction?

Im still disappointed we didnt get the HAL LC helicopter for CSAT. They look as SciFi as it gets. Like something out of a movie. http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/75/LCH_%28HEMANT_RAWAT_%29_%282%29.JPG http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/31/HAL_LCH_at_Aero_india_2013.JPG

Im looking for all infantry addons that either feature gasmasks or those riot gear / SWAT helmets with a comlete visor: http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20111219220649/zombie/images/9/9c/Riot_Gear.jpg So far I only have the "Project Paranoia" Troops: http://www.armaholic.com/page.php?id=13984 I also have this screenshot, but couldnt pinpoint the exact addon: http://www.armaholic.com/datas/users/11657-smg1.jpg

Perfect! I know you also worked on porting the Su-27 to Arma 3, do you also have an ArmA 2 version? Since the vanilla Su-27 has no weapons...

I never heard the "ARMA IS NO SIMULATOR!!!" arguments before the release of ArmA III....Back then you would have gotten flamed to the ground if you had called ArmA anything else than a "Military Simulator". It even was on the box of the game... And now? "Hey when my helicopter comes crashing down from 10.000 feet it suddenly activates some kind of anti-grav engines...". "AND? ARMA IS NO SIMULATOR!!!! IS PERFECT GAME! ALL HAIL BIS!!!".

The F-14 Tomcat is propably my favourite jet ever. (Yes I know my nicks says "Fulcrum" :D ). But as an OPFOR fighter in ArmA III? Naah. My suggestion would be something slightly unusual, to fit the "future" tone of ArmA III. Maybe one of the cancelled Sukhoi jets, like the Su-37 "Terminator" with working thrust vectoring.

While I am grateful for all the time and effort you put into one of the best mods for ArmA: Many of "your" addons were donations and ports...Do you really want to use double-standards and deny these addons the possibility to live on? Especially considering ArmA III could use some more vehicles? I dont want to offend you...Again all the time you spend with RACS proves its really your mod and your addons, but still, would RACS be in the same state it is now without donations and ports?

By the way, we should stop calling it the PAK FA. Its called the Sukhoi T-50. PAK FA is the name of the program. Like JSF for the F-35.

The PAK-FA has something called "Plasma Stealth" O_o Didnt know something like that existed. Sounds very SciFi.

I just read your signature...You really have given up do you? "ARMA 3 IS ONLY THE BASE FOR COMMUNITY CONTENT ITS NOT SUPPOSED TO BE A COMPLETE GAME" Releasing an unfinished game is one thing, but releasing something unfinished and then saying "Uh its supposed to be that way...We never intended to do anything more" is a slap in the face of long-time fans who are around since OFP -_- Fuck this makes me angry. BIS had problems, you were forced to release ArmA III early, allright I wont give you heat for that. BIS isnt EA or Activision after all. The 60$ price tag still upsets me, but ok whatever. BUT: Instead of being honest, telling the community that you know you basically released a Beta as a complete game, and giving us a transparent explanation of what to expect for the future, you now start this apologistic bullshit about how the community was always supposed to complete the game. No matter how important addons and community content are, I still expect a rich and diverse game as a foundation, and everyone can see ArmA 3 is far from it. From reskinned vehicles re-using the same parts to the abysmal perfomance, ArmA 3 is not what I thought it would be. And seeing the general tone in this and other forums: Neither does the community. Therefore: Talk to us. Give us a clear roadmap of what to expect regarding future plans & content. Im ready to wait another six months and pay more money for DLCs, but I want a clear picture of what to expect. I DONT want to read signature by BIS employees bullshitting me about the current state of the game.

Just a suggestion, since VTOL seems to be somewhat relevant in the selection of planes in past games (F-35, Harrier, Osprey): Some russian VTOL plane based on the soviet "Freestyle" VTOL jets.

Apart from the fact that it still runs like shit on high-end computers. And gets boring after a few days because it lacks enough distinctive vehicles. Get back to work.

Of course you do....I on the other hand welcome that more and more reviews are critical. The biggest german Gameschannel on TV (formerly with MTV) also said ArmA III is nice, but for 60$ its unfinished and empty. And it is.

Ah ok. Dont forget the MiG 25. http://s1.directupload.net/images/130925/bn7yjnzh.jpg http://s7.directupload.net/images/130925/ja7m6emh.jpg. My favourite plane in ArmA 2. (Or MiG-31? I cant tell them apart)

Ha amazing. Funny thing, the Combine could now actually serve a dual role as some kind of realistic mercenary / OPFOR group. They dont look that SciFi anymore compared to the other Arma III stuff. I mean ArmA III now has reached that "Metal Gear" and "Half-Life" level of SciFi, thats still "kind of" realistic and using parts of todays tech.