davex83

I hope yes, I still can't figure how they opted for a 5vs5 game....

Hi there, my first post here, sorry if someone already pointed to this but search button isn't my friend... Can we have a 6vs6 game instead of 5vs5? I am asking for this because I did some competitive matches on different fps and we always play 6vs6. 6vs6 player is the most natural option to play fps in competitive mode because each squad has 3 sub-squads composed by 2 players, this is very important for tactics (cap a point, clear rooms, etc) Sorry for my poor eng, I learned it by myself...

Ok but in this thread we are talking about authenticity of the game especially for vehicles and settings...so i understand your position, but if you haven't nothing to say about the thread theme stop complaining about gameplay and write about yours gameplay suggestions on the proper thread, why still trying to persuade us how bad is talking about names or settings?

I quoted you because i agree with every single word, but tell me... where is the problem if i hope to see both features gameplay/game engine and "visual superficialities" solved? Isn't worse to see the old problems of gameplay and engine still here lie low a futuristic setting not credible at all? So me and you have the solution...devs please save the good thing of ArmA, the setting close to real (me) and focus on gameplay and engine problems (you)!!!

This made me sad...sometimes i dream to be the universe emperor...i can see me with a beer in a hand, a gold throne under my @$$, and with my unlimited powers enter the minds of game developers and tell them what players want from games (ARMA 3, BATTLEFIELD, JOINT OPERATION...) as i read in years on forums and others media... ...and no, sorry, who complain isn't only a OLD fan...this is the worse way to see the problem...(as i say, see other franchise glory end)

I am pretty sure that a remake of ArmA 2 with new engine will sell more than ArmA 3 due to the futuristic setting of the second one. I repeat they should open a vote on their community, see how many threads were opened about the futuristic setting.

To be honest i will prefer a non futuristic setting, would be more realistic and immersive than now, and the actual geopolitical situation in Europe, Asia and US is perfect for a fictional conflict more near at us on time. Real weapons, vehicles and names should be present and also different factions for each side (italian, french, uk forces etc etc vs iran, turk, russian forces), i don't think devs would have problems on refresh the ArmA 2 models for ArmA 3, and they could release the futuristic content as expansion (like ArmA 2: Private Military Company) where a special high tech force come in help for the two main story forces. But i know...this would remain a dream... Devs should open a vote on forums and site to see what people want, BIS are already known for respect they deserve to players and this should be a great move even in marketing ;) (sorry for my poor eng, isn't my language and i learn it by myself)