plutoto74

Hello, I think a more detailed filters for servers will be good cause more and more servers used differents mods and the vanillia game is no long used for servers. Just an idea to match more with the want of the players. There's so many mods and a lot are so good to have a better game but it becomes difficult to find the good choice in this jungle. Just add a system of filters for mods to match the already installed mods on the client side. Continue the good work, this game is more and more interesting and the community is very big.

Hi, am a fan since OFPF and I wondering why arma 3 for a milsim or a game which simulate military stuff is less realistic on some points than other games. For exemple I take Insurgency, it's not an open world like Arma 3 but it's enough realistic on many points. 3D scopes : a big problem in Arma 3 since the beginning of this, there's no realistic zoom, I know the limitation of the engine caused with the big open world but it's a big deal like in Insurgency to match more the reality, other games do better than Arma and it's a good way to follow. Grenades : in Arma 3 just press G and a you throw a grenade magically very quickly without take off the pin, in Insurgency like some games you've got the animation with a realistic delay to take off the pin and throw the grenade. There's other points to check with other games but for a realistic game like Arma 3 for the use of weapons it's not enough good.

I know that, and limtation with a realistic visual damage (gore) but it's another complicated subject.

@tpw, nice, I will try your mods maybe after the release to have a more stable version. Do you plan a advanced wounding system more realistic than actually like SLX did with A2 in combination with ACE? I never modding so it is possible to save a character before apply injuries cause SLX used a generic burned character and do you think it's possible to dismember this saved character with Ragdoll applied ( using all the new features of RV4 )? Sorry I'm really beginner for scripting ( never try ) but I'm fan since OFP. This can be awesome to have features like VBS2 2.0 cause A3 is too limited like now ; I really like realistics features and don't have enough money for VBS. ;-) My idea was to load the character to apply some effects to him without a generic character, but again I know nothing on the limits of modding with RV4. I'm new in the community because I have internet for few years ; always play with the serie in SP, so my knowledge is really limited...

Why, did he stop to play Arma? No news?

Because BIS doesn't really interested by more simulation, ACE+ACRE+SLX with a new version using all the features of RV4 and SLX more like VBS2 2.0 could make A3 the ultimate simulation, really awesome. I really hope that SLX improve for A3!

SLX is not new, a great mod but not enough realistic on visual serious injuries cause of generic character always burn.

With what you say no reason to make a war game, maybe a paintball game or a game on the military training without real rounds, weapons and just a BIP when you're hit. Yes it's boring, no reason to continue realism without a touch of realism in all ways. If the game is not open for more realistics injuries maybe for mods after the release, this game will lost a lot, not because you will be happy with this, but maybe with the lost of people bored by this mind, a good game ( sim ) locked into a freeze state on this point ( and others ). Yes there's no reason to make a war game without realistics wounds and medics and it's boring me without. In fact maybe it's promote war indirectly by cutting off the real scenes in war, yes war is horrible but on a virtual screen no matter, it's just to show what it's can happen, but don't panic it's not real, and you can turn it off. If A3 has just a poor thing like SLX mod ( for realism ) I'm sure it's my last time with Arma, and I don't want... Not to say I want to move to other games but for a sim Arma is sometimes outstanded by the others, it's sad!

Good answer. A sim needs to be realistic, if you don't want so much realism options are here to set at your taste.

Yes, and a vital organs detection, it's possible with hitboxes. A better and more realistic wounding system and the bloodloss. It's not too much to ask for a sim, to be more realistic, a new level for Arma. Same thing for the options because not everybody want so much realism. But if there's no gore in the main game, this stuff as to be done by the dev team, and an open system for gore, with an engine ready to go for modders because it's too difficult with RV4. And everybody is happy!

And when there's nothing to eat to search and eat worms! It's ridiculous your answer!

Why do you play at a war game? Arma is a game ( simulation ) where we try to simulate reality and gore is a part of war. ---------- Post added at 13:48 ---------- Previous post was at 13:45 ---------- Realism realism realism, as long as war will exist gore too. Gore another time is a part of war so if we want to simulate war we need to simulate all, so for me a better game ( simulation ). ---------- Post added at 13:51 ---------- Previous post was at 13:48 ---------- How do you want to have a realistic wounding system without realistic wounds, do you want a game tottaly sanitized? Graphic side of gore is just for better visual realism of war. ---------- Post added at 13:56 ---------- Previous post was at 13:51 ---------- Again we simulate war so all things is important for realism, there's nothing to say anymore. It is necessary to play at a war game? Sure that all part of realism is important to impoved/implemented, but gore is a part of realism for simulating war.

They don't really dissociate real life and virtuality. The thing is with gore in a game is not the same as reality, it's pixels. I personnaly prefer gore in a game than in a movie, and it's not with better graphics now, the photorealism, that it's changing for me, but I can understand who don't, it's why an option for this is the best thing. In life I'm sure that who don't like gore in game don't like or don't have the same mind on many subjets face to the others humans, it's human. But it's sad that who don't want gore in the game try to change our mind, respect!

Keep your money @Michaelp800, the thing is that they can do this additional content for selling it cause not everybody is for it, with a price around 30€ it's possible and will be a great succes due to a new dimension in term of realism. I'm sure it's possible, but does BIS want it. The fact is that lot of people in a specific part of the game want more realism, like with planes and helis... An extension for battleship can be a great succes too. But not everything is to sell apart, only things specifics.

Totally agree with you @Brain. For rating question this game is about war and simulate it, so no reason that this game has rating under 18, maybe BIS will lost some customers but for good reasons, and they will grow-up, so futures customers, and the realism brings to the game for the happiness of a part of theirs already fans. If not in the vanilla version for these questions of rating, a future DLC or an additional-disc.

You're wrong the game is nearly 76% done and many years before, if will exist, A4, so they can do an additional disc or DLC to do it. But with this type of arguments, not only on this subject, BIS doesn't have to really enhance the game. A3 has to go in your way? There's many type of players and many tastes. I prefer that's the game move higher!

Arma is a game with simulation elements for devs but it was originally designed as a simulation, nothing limit now the game to the down ( more arcade ), I mean 3rd person view, extended armor ( it was already in OFP ), and nobody will limit that because BIS wants to open a little the type of players coming from another games to sell more, it's a fact. But now for long-term fans like me since the origin of the serie with OFP who want more realism, ( and video games will stay for a long time or will never match reality visually as good as they are ) we can't, such as a barrier which you cannot cross. This realism for a better wounding AND medic system is not possible without realistics things, I mean a better analysis of what can cause a wound ( type of weapon ), where ( hitbox detection ) and the visual is just to try to match the reality, but it's virtual, with more red pixels ( need blood loss ). The character is virtual too, dismemberment for more realism ( imagine a realistic wounding and medic system without ). You don't want to ban horror movies because you don't like that, and maybe you have friends who like it! It's not because you play, so you do the action that it's like reality, it's virtual. We don't want you to use it, but to choose, so why do you want to choose for us? If it's additional what's the matter? After BISimulation has done it for VBS, so bad argument for the artists. Even if it can be done with a mod the engine need to be open or ready for it. I want to push the game ( simulation ) to another level so what the matter if you can play without this feature? The respect goes in all ways, I respect your choice, respect our. But sure that if this will stay with a ton of mods for realism, and lake a lot of wishes and features, honestly, I think that I will stop with Arma and I don't want, it's sad because I really love this game and BIS. But some forces want to keep this game as it is without a big enhancement that have to be done in all ways. That's said, peace!

Excuse-me but no sense for a war game and more for a simulation like Arma which simulate...WAR.

It's not because we want realistics wounds and a better medic system that we want the rest less realistic, all is important, but to forget serious injuries is not realistic. No focus just on it, but here this the tread so we stay on the subject. ---------- Post added at 08:40 ---------- Previous post was at 08:37 ---------- this is the tread... Excuse-me I wrote quickly.

Ok @Dav english is not my native language. What I would say that try to write something positive, I'm not against you, but to give example. Difficult for me to explain.

Ok my appologize, maybe we think about this the same way. I'm against arcade players in Arma, and gore for no reason too. Just want more realism, not just for this but all the most realistics wishes doable. Sorry my friend!

That's exactly a bad argument to include it, no vicious "keep an eye on gore" to do it! Have to be realistic but without crazy people. Sorry but you can't help on the subject like that! ---------- Post added at 11:05 ---------- Previous post was at 10:56 ---------- So why do you play at a war game? Characters seem to die in it! Simulation is to simulate the reality, another time if you can choose in the options... Sorry but it's a bad argument, I don't want to be focus on this gore in the action to stay alive. And lot of people who want this is just about realism and not for bad reasons. We don't want you to use it so why do you want to ban it? Democraty... It's a virtual world with virtuals characters, they won't suffer, life is and will stay worth! No fascination for that but just realism like we want in others ways. No reason to be worry about us, but we can be about you if you want to control our mind!

I'm tired to listen always goods ( in fact bads! ) reasons for no gore, but there's lot of good reasons to have it. People plays at war, it ridiculous without reals injuries because of a simulator ( a game with simulations elements for devs ). But now it's possible to do it additionnaly, so why so much NO. I'm tired of that, I'm fan since OFP and wanted to have this gore but impossible before, and now that it is, what? Nothing? It's seriously ridiculous... In fact some arcades games are sometimes on some aspects more realistics, I prefer Arma but on this subject it's tiring...

I hope that it's not like in A2, because of flies present directly after the death, it was ridiculous and not realistic, it takes time for this and depend on weather, temperature... But I like the idea too.

I want a Realistic Wounding System as it was mentionned in the Feedback Tracker, to enhance the realism of A3. Serious injuries like it is in war, not a paintball game. This is to have more immersion in this virtual world. More naval and air firefight combined to the infantry. Underground possibilities. More vivid world with civilians and better buildings inside with more details. Larges cities. And of course more use of next gen graphics and physics with better use of computers, CPU and GPU to make it possible with more complex and number of AI and, or number of players in MP.