nop123

Yea there's a horde of hackers turning everyone into seagull in EVERY arma 3 server.

I won't keep arguing. It's obvious you don't get the point. EDIT: let's enjoy this time :) https://store.bistudio.com/

So yea land in crazy places, and you call arma a simulation ? As I already said, you CAN'T land a jet on grass in real life. Therefore, changes are needed (don't make landings on grass possible). If they don't accept at least THIS requirement, then they are not trying to make a simulation, but to make the game more playable. Ok keep telling me about carriers. But why VTOL ? There are already tons of addons in arma 2 for carrier ops, why can't they integrate those into arma 3 ? And I don't want to download tons of mods, because no server will ever use them.

In real life there are a lot more possibilities to send there jets. Here not. So a balance is required unless you don't extend the map.

Ahaha yes take off a jet directly from grass. You're lucky that arma allows it (which is a lot unrealistic). And yes, try to find the flat land :). Without air superiority if the pilots are good enough you won't have any possibility anyway. The AA can do really nothing in there, there is no SAM and you can evade missiles so easily. If there will be carriers there have to be proper jets and functions then, not only a prop. This game is going to be a lot UNBALANCED and irrealistic in a pvp scenario. I think this is why there have always been more coop servers than pvp ones. I have no idea why they have to upgrade everything but the jets remain always the same (I've seen TGP addons... but none uses them in multiplayer anyway + they just copied the F-35 from previous and put it in Arma 3... great improvement, no new jets for A3 I bet). And addons won't fix the problem at all since a lot of people don't even care about them in multiplayer except rare ones (ACE for example, but that doesn't fix all the problems anyway). I have never seen in arma 2 a server with F-18 jet addon or others. Developers got to integrate all the important addons in the game or it'll never be realistic enough. Yea this is kinda different discussion, but it's a warning for developers because if I am going to buy A3, I won't do the same for let's say A4 if there is no improvement at all. Since jets affect the ground units experience too, then it can't remain like this, because it'd make the entire game-sim not trying to simulate anything at all. P.S. where is the problem in merging stratis and altis anyway ? Altis is soooooo big (290 km2), where is the problem in adding a simple 20 km2 island ?

Secure airspace ? If there is only one airfield... and again, you can't get the airfield back.

It's encouraging the control of airfield, not using jets... Let's say someone starts having the airfield. They have jets, and you ? Do you really think AA will do much ? You won't be able to get it anyway as there is no way to shoot them down (if you're a good pilot of course) and instead they'll own your ground units (==you can't get the airfield..).

Dammit merge altis and statis... or add at least another airfield. 1 airbase for each map is weird, it's discouraging jets...

I suggest buying via BIS store also because steam will probably do the usual unfair thingy ($ = €) and to support BI even more as already said.