BobcatBob

Oh there will be. THERE WILL BEEE

lol..

I would love to but may gaming PC is dead and will not be back for a LOOONG time, so I cannot play even "light" games on my current PC, it's really shitty! So im just curious if anything stands out to you or anyone else, so I can maybe have some more info on how the super-realistic flight-model will be in Arma 3, since there is no offical news about anything for a month, im desperate for anything possibly relevent:o As a side note do planes in A2 have a flight model that is realistic? just curios.

:butbut::butbut::butbut::butbut::butbut::butbut::butbut::butbut::butbut: :butbut:PLEEEEEEEZZZZZZZZEE?????????

Damn...we MUST SEE THIS!!

Iz the Pr3dator!!!

bruggums y u no anser my question!:p

Cool! good to know.

Wait are you saying you know this because you have worked with BI on Arma 3 or because you just know alot of stuff about the RV engine. (Did the graphics settings work this way in the transition from A1 to A2?)

Just cause the options there doesnot mean I support it, (forthefivemillionthtime) I only try to make this poll as acceptable as possible to ALL people, even those with wishes bigger than mine (I thought $10-$20 was realsitic but maybe just $10 is better i'll give you that now, but it is a PERSONAL opinion we both share now, other people might not, u know.) $10 is probably the best/most realistic option that will not hurt sales in any way. (NOONE who like this game will be put off by 10 extra little dollars, they'll just wait for the eventual price drop if there so damn cheap anyway. So, I voted 20 more, therefore i am obvioulsy okay with 10 more same as the few who chose 50 more are fine with 10 more.) Other people May. Think. Different. So enough with "50 more are u mad?" comments, when I never said I wanted that much.:)

Can anyone please clarify (at least based on the TKOH community preview) what the differences/ additons are between the Arma 2 heli flight model and the fancy-schmancy TKOH one? E.X Will steering be more/less percise or the effects of X/Y feature be more prominent? Please make sure to explain in Layman's terms so I can underdstand:) Thank you!

It has been awhile, but strangly I feel alot more patient during this particlular wait compared to the last one where I was all like SKJGPIOSha;phg;epHOSIE{O#R#*# r7383r835PSHF:KSD >:(!!! I feel like they will release something around end of october/begining of November, which is right when BF3 and MW3 will get lots of love, myabe BIS does this so we wont feel lonley ;) But really though the last gamescom vids have been pretty underwhelming so im hoping BIS takes the rest of october to work on RTT and PhysX that can be shown in a truly awsesome demo video. It will be worth the wait for me and if it's good enough it could get a lot of coverage on the internet! (If it manages to do all that in the midst of the BF/MW3 hype-train it will truly besomething special. Most gamers don't even know that arma EXISTS! I found out about it on accident myself.

Is anyone concioulsy aware of any engine limitations (based off arma 2 mostly) that would prevent this feature from functioning properly or would come down to a simple decision by BIS to decide whether it's worth it or not. Maybe this feautre requires some use of RTT:confused: Also, it's good to know im not cray!;) Thanks for all the info/good discussion guys, maybe the devs will notice this thread and respond! (Hopefully with something more than a little "teaser" though;))

Yeah, in my mind... "BIS has just finsinished including EVERYTHYNG they and the community could possibly want, and the game is done and ready to go gold a full week ahead of schedule, OR SO THEY THINK! They then realize that they have forgotten ONE more feature, radio's that play music from players hard drives in vehicles except during audio transmissions:eek:! They then have a VERY important decsision to make: 1.They can take this full week and impliment this feature into Arma 3.....or 2. They can just take the extra week off to get drunk and go to strip clubs After much careful debate the team casts their votes and chooses option 2 in a landslide victory over NO ONE ELSE:)" THE END.

awsesome!!!

I would like multi-optic support like in VBS 1.5!!

I think I'll put this idea in the wishlist thread just in case!

nonononoo. Thats NOT what im saying:) I mean you put one scope INFRONT of another so they work SIMULTANIOULSY LIKE AN ACOG AND A TWS so you get the enhanced zoom along with thermal vision. Just look at the VBS2 1.5 features list to know what im talking about. Edit: Nice pic smurf, made me lol :D

attaching multiple scopes onto the rail of a gun so that they work together.

Okay...I guess no "stacking" optics in A3 :(

I can imagine a SUPER COMPLICATED user made module to dictate EXACTLY how this new feature could work depending on wants/needs of a specific misssion/scenario. Like Maybe if you get too close to an enemy your disguise will ware off?

*gasp* the noble Dwarden has spoken:eek: $10 increase it is! /thread

Other than the fact that Arma3 seeks to "lure" the "console gamers" and get a small fraction of their huge collective money? and is everyone who says that the won't buy the game because it's 10 dollars more at retail being serious b/c you can just wait a year till the games $50 or less. I mean this is Arma, you get the most bang for your buck. The E3 vids so far prove that, so bitching about 10 extra dollars if you can't wait for one of the best games ever (assuming you actually LIKE the franchise anyway to begin with) is ridiculious, so much so, that that word doesn't deserve to be spelled correctly in this context.

Already said what you think would be reasonable/realistic to EVERYONE seriously though most games on the market (console games) are ten dollars more than Arma at launch. I doubt ten extra dollars would hurt that much to the individual consumer and decrease sales. And that extra $10 per sale multiplyed by the sales of A3 would be a huge benefit to BI and I firmly believe we would see the results of our greater "investment" in the next title to follow (a pole about what ONLY YOU WOULD WANT TO PAY AND NO ONE ELSE would be pointless.) Hope that clears things up:) ---------- Post added at 08:08 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:01 PM ---------- Well 10 USD is 20% of the original price of 50 USD, so each pole option adds an additional 20% to the base price! (I'll see if I can edit the pole now:))

But MORE MONEY+MORE MONEY=EVEN MORE MONEY!!!!:) Didn 'chu eva lurn to math gud bouy????!???