KEVINMGXP

You have a good point here besides the fact that people that don't own previous content bis games are also able to play with those content without contributing for it. I mean I don't see that entirly as fair towards bis so a tiny charge for it to those that dont own would be in place, some sort of didection of registration settings of the former games to download it freely but if it is not didected you will be re directed for payment. On the other hand this might take a lot of effort for bis to do it that way but they did it also with the download for the re release of ArmA Cold war assault so i think they might be able to do it again for such features ..... kind regards

corrected it it's not my native language you know lol

lol good one, spitfire is not a bad thing also but hmmm i think falling for it is a other thing were not living in the 1940's anymore .... so true minus the moron part then :D

Politicaly it is been that way since if i recal it correct 1980's its also better known as the culture wars. The term frequently implies a conflict between the values of the considered traditionalist or conservative and those considered progressive or liberal. But its nothing worse or better then in my country tbh politics sucks globaly these days ... kind regards

lol yeah that looks fun .... Sorry sir a cant connect to my home coputer I am 1 million miles above earth please call again when I am back over 6 monts :D

Right like when a unit gets to badly wounded so the medic is not able to patch him up again to move on you as player can decide to dismiss and call for extraction the AI will be scripted for that. The unit will be picked up by a medvac or something like that and you or the AI leader can move on with your team to meet the objectives given .... well maybe something to atatch on a new medical system I don't know ... And for a stuck character that leaves behind a some kind of headbug thing like in ace where you as a player can ask the game to refresh and the unit will spawn closer up for the AI commander this will be scripted again. Then the tweak for the movement speed that is stated in the op, so it will align abit more towards the player character so they are not drafting to much behind and when it would happen they also spawn to a closer possition and thus the mission will not brake to easely in a whole ... However it might take some good thinking to work it out doh ...

I like to play with such calls and returned the favour and if they go maaad like crazy its such a satisfaction :D anyway reported it to microsoft and the police but they can't do much they seem to move arround so its hard to pin point where they are operating from. sadly a lot of people get scammed for it they always will find something to steal from people :( ....

Well I like that id but what if the player is the leader? And what with lets say leave no one behind will the unit be spawned in to the plane/shopper or in a surtain distance closer to the whole unit group or will it be removed from the map?

You have a good point, ArmA is never meant to be to player centric however if the AI is scattering way of on the leader it can't be good eather (anyway thats when the player is the leader of course.) So a little fine tune on it will do at surtain points regarding AI moving in formation .... kind regards

Don't get mad about it :p but yeah he can get the sims for that .... I don't think they will be in, it will take a whole new set of skeletons to make for them, bis can't just build them on the male ones due to the fact that a female does move a little different then males and to simulate it correct they need a whole new setup. Not only that with the new feature that you will be able to setup your gear more freely it might complicate such things. Besides that you might want to read my post above and others stated also that they already have females serving in the army in several country's that are effective fighting in a combat area for years now so it's not a future thing it's just something some people want to see in game of the third installment to get an more lifelike, blood curdling, hair raising experience then we already have now .... kind regards

I think I understand where you pointing at, however your concern is surviving wise. On the other hand pure on the calculative pov I don't think you need to worry as far as I know females are still up to par with males towards the global population its a little give and take. population 2009 (est.) males: 3,442,850,573 females: 3,386,509,865 total: 6,829,360,438 there is enough ..... to multiply :D I already did my part lol ... but still, the op is about having the possibility to have female characters to be able to carry a weapon and fire it. Whether they will be implemented with referation towards the real world is in fact not a part of the discussion at hand and I ask myself why people even take it in consideration to make a whole thing about it. the point is that in real life they do exist and they do serve their country well, I see a lot of arguments that they should not be on the front line but then again the question is where do you draw a front line in a guerilla war? It is in the way past to fight battles head on and front lines are rarely drawn these days you have a sector of control but still it can be a hot zone ... Females do see active combat and they perform actually pretty well you should look it up they do carry more on their back then a lot of others think. besides that point I do understand the point to the nature of the male, when a female gets hurt shot/harmed in any way that they have the urge to put their lives at stake and to save her but I also know they get trained for that. Those that put their lives at stake without thinking are not thinking straight and should not considered combat effective in the first place that's why they get physical and psychological training anyway. So I hope with all the information you can read on here in this thread we can go on in discussing the OP's question in stead of making a debate whether they should be on the battle field in real life or not. I would like to see them in game but it will be unlikely that they will because like said before they will need to make a whole new set of animations for them and skeletons to make them work. kind regards

thanks ill test it out tonight ;-)

I knew that my AI Units where walking slower so yeah that would be nice if they take a look at it and correct the speeds. however I was not entierly aware of it that running gives a higher boost then sprinting nor that crouch is even going faster then running lol :D

they would take them of the field and correct the situation the army will not allow it to contineu if it goes bad to keep the program running? DMarkwick its a myth. Through folklore in various forms, poetry and art, theater and film, we have become accustomed to the notion of the male warrior as a heroic character whose sacrifice is for a greater cause. This picture is set in many males minds and it seems also in yours they never made a bad decision in regards of putting females on the battle field, au contraire they even vow that in many cases the female performs well and in some situations even better then the males soldier. but I am going to back out on it it has no sense to continue this kind of debate .... kind regards

Sorry DMarkwick in many cases I would follow you on your debates because you have lots and lots of times many good things to add but this time I will disagree with you. This is not personal but I just cant seem to agree on this kind of things. such things are close watched and some are even having a relationships it strengthening their bands. It is a proven fact that one fights harder when it is loved ;) ..... It is sexist and it is an insult to serving females like he is stating it, you say that I am taking it to derailment. sorry but at least you give your point of view clearly I can reply on it with a decent pov and you are giving yours but I can also decently disagree on it. Hes statement was to my feeling just BS nothing to add a pov of booty and boobs and aaah no it is to dangerous for their kind. they did research on the whole concept of putting females on active duty. They evaluated it they did it over again they went back from the start and evaluated it again and then they putted them on a training program before they made a final decision on it. Do you think the army will put their own forces at a to high risk of many losses on the combat field, think again ... This is proven to be wrong many many times! sorry mate but i can't really agree on this in any way because it is not true, "DE OUDE BELGEN" like we call it here putted females on the battle field just only because they where fighting harder to survive and protect their assets I can give you many more examples how it evolves on the actual battle field in a GOOD way. Not because i say so. Tests and evaluations, debates proved the opesite from what you are stating. Test programs even stated that it is a huge step forwards in combat experience and a good thing. I feel that many of you are blinded to the mere fact that females belong in the kitchen and not doing what was for the male natural biologically programmed. who made it so ..... the PAST generation males? do be aware that we have being evolving mate :D ... But then again I can debate this all night long and agree to disagree or how do I say it, the thing is the op pointed out to put female soldiers in the game because of the mere fact that the story goes from the desperate pov and that when desperate you would burn every asset available to put counter weight on the battle field and yes on a realistic pov it will add lots of emersive situations in the game. But thats the thing 3 quart of the entire thread is about a debate of having females in RL on the battle field yes or no and like I already said its all BS in regards of the OP and certainly not respectful towards active RL females in combat because they are putting their lives on the line for our safety ... kind regards

Bull - shieeeet :eek: I have one comment for you try and have some respect for those that give birth to you lad! I honestly see a lot of disrespect in this post towards females. And you should think twice before typing something out like this :o I am embarrassed in your behave! I can say one thing this is the same for males so your comments is pure rubische if a person ( not female nor male ) just the individual is not up to the physically and psychological standards on the tasks at hand they will get other possibilities to do their duty for their coutry! You are not looking it from the individual point but you think about boobs so you say its not belonging their pure BS mate. lol and lol again this is just so aaah, you are making a joke of your selves really .... You are a headcase Kozlowski :D its ok in a game because it is a popular game but wow when it comes to real life, where you actually reading the op? sadly like above I counter a lot of BS on this topic, personally I think that I start to see why bis is not putting them in game for what it is worth "sadly" some need to let their head examined. In what for time do we live anno 1811 or anno 2011? :o I vow to lock this thing down before its getting out of hand and I think it upsets more people then it does good and I am one of them, I feel kinda sad about such comments, they add nothing towards the discussion and i start to get why this is not belonging here not because the female characters asked but some community members are having just to many testosterone on the wrong place and an embarrassment to us as an individual .... kind regards

this is nice to hear binkowski i asked meatball something in that line to make an entire replacement pack for the ArmA2 USMC with your marines and hes Marsoc units. one sollid pack: replacement of soldiers crew and pilots etc ... replacement of all Force recons replacement of all Razor team members (however the last a little more variated to distinquis them from the regular FR guys) maybe a large request but just a thought i tried to work on a replacement file for those MARSOC units but i bump on errors on the .paa however i want to learn it if you are planning something in this line ill step down they are your and meatballs units btw ;)

its nothing to worie about you do fine ;-) you did actualy a good job on them maybe concider also releasing a woorland pack for the regular force recon to align with the razor team? and one thing don't know if others encountered but if you play the campaign again with this guys the sniper of razor team (dmr) holds an m4 not the dmr sniper rifle. kind regards

:cool: Ill state it again, its sad to see so many fire on this topic to have them implemented, In my personal opinion the next needs some clarification. It is not because other games don't have a feature ArmA3 can't implement it in, as I am aware this is on a high wish list of the community and thus I see no harm in it doing so. Give me one vallid reason why not and try to back it up with a sensible and constructive argument so people can see why not to have them implemented. To be honenst you crossed that line like 7 times in your post so don't go there :p Noes he has a serious question with ridiculous answers :rolleyes: Now what has attention to do anything with the request of the op stated in this thread? can you give some sort of a valid constructive arguments on it? yes thank you, I like to be in the mission editor and put up scenarios I see a good point to put a female combat soldier in a video. I see where you heading to, Ill just point to the next question .... I love females very much are you not? That does not mean that you nor me want to be one yes. At this answer I can only say dude you hold a few fetish kind of thoughts in that tiny brain of yours :D, however we now know how your brain is functioning it adds nothing to the question at hand. And her creators made a good peas of virtual art so it has no reason to put it that way, then again what has lara croft to do with ArmA3 anyway? I bet you will be the first one to try it out hu. Yeah thats right oooh this is a valid argument .... No because we have a desire to see them in the game, this however does not mean for me personally that they need to be. If they are I will welcome them I see no point to not have them in anyway. or is it Because you say so? right .... kind regards

I stricktly focussed on PC games. But you have a valid point if you are used to play 30fps on a 360p then you will be deffinitly be fine with a 720p ;)

personally I would not go less then for 1080P but some don't mind I think this is more of a personal feel then a requirment for ArmA3 but non the less 1080p is to my pov better.

well son then I need to say you need to make a choice :D or ArmA3 is more inportent for you or not? Nah look the I5 is fine the card should do fine to make sure you have room for improvements if needed so that you can upgrade your hardware cofiguration slightly if ArmA3 requirs it. So in fact you need to decide what is important to you, rendering graphics quality or only gameplay quality or even both I personally will go for both.

as far as i am aware systems are rarely using 8 gb ram, but if it is cheaper to purchase at some point why not doing so. other then that i5 should be ok gtx 560ti should be fine to but there is always room for improvement if your wallet allows it but then I would advice to wait till when you exactly know what mini maxi settings are required ;-) it might be cheaper then now and you would be able to upgrade more sufficient to the game requirments that ArmA3 will ask. kind regards

Right +1 No steam forced launche please :D I think I will speak for a lot of dedicated ArmAverse players that I will back off purshasing ArmA3 if it would be implemented anyway. I like how bis is doing this now, if you want to buy it trough steam you will be able to but it is not forced nor required. It has like you say to many limitations, I purshached 2 games trough steam (total war) in the past and sadly I had 2 times bad luck with it it costed me hell of a time to get it solved and after sale suports are pretty bad in my personal experiance. That said about steam it is not worth it to implement steam binded accounts to have a good anti cheat program it will only bring bis more unhappy people then happy people and for my account an game providor is in my opinion not entiled to force their costumors to have an internet connection its against my freedom and I rather want to own my software on a DVD/disc VAC is to my experiance not good at all I was banned way years back for hacking while I never cheated in my entire game experianced life, it got solved but I needed to do a lot of effort and begging to get it corrected again "no thanks" Point to the anti cheats are not bullet prove whatever you do however I would like to see an improvement for the current one, like already said make sure the admin will have more freedom to block out what is not wanted on the server and to point out something already passed in this thread the bomb hacking take some look in to it they are indeed very annoying. Or hold the option on PB, it is not that bad I had problems with it in the past but like I see it now it has had a lot of improvement these days. Anyway good to hear that steam will not be required and that bis is not planning to follow that pad :cool: anyway this is mere my pov on the anti cheat thing + I point out that I am severely against STEAM "just Don't" kind regards

Hey nice that you released these but is it possible to release it without ace content? It said that it needs ACEX_USnavy however i rather not play single player with Ace so if it is possible and if you don't mind can you look in to it? ;) kind regards