Pretty much.
Totally agreed. Most of the news until now are about things that people:
1. Already knew
2. Already suspected
3. Could have learned with 30 minutes of conversation with a local, from the place which the information concerns.
And since the source of the leaks (SIPRNET, or something like that) is assumed not to hold the topmost classified information, there is no reason to believe that the next releases will show anything better.
I think that what drew most of the attention to the subject was the "gossip" nature of the leak's content. The only aspect that caught me by surprise was to know that diplomats - always full of protocols, procedures and such - also have a sharp tongue to talk about others, when nobody's looking. This seemed very human to me.
As for Wikileaks, c'mon guys, they are a lot overrated. They have no compromise with truth or freedom of information. Mostly, it is just a place for hackers to exhibit skillz. Or, as Binkowski's pic synthetises, for trolls to get lulz and publicity.