Ragingbear505

Well I wouldn't say a small part. The US represents about 70% of NATO's funding and about 40% of its armed forces. Still I was under the impression that Arma 3 was a Euro-centric conflict with the US acting in a supporting role. According to the Wiki Bluefor is the US 7th Infantry Division (7th US Army Europe). Of course that's just the lore tidbit for the campaign. Given the future tech it's pretty hard to definitively distinguish much of anything we've seen so far as specifically American.

Game looks like total shit on my rig, performance is terrible, especially in multiplayer, but man this is the funnest Arma game yet. The next few years are gonna be awesome, already excited for Arma 4.

I'd be fine with women in the game, especially the prostitutes from Arma 2, dayum. But seriously I don't want to see Arma 3 become another Skyrim-warrior-stripper-simulator.

I don't think we should worry. Reading the interview I believe they're specifically referring to purely cosmetic animations for AI characters only. You know how when they sit in vehicles or be crouched and sometimes awkwardly rotate their head back and forth as if scanning the horizon? I think they're just saying that the AI will now just have a canned animation rather than try to utilize actual game mechanics. I think in practice the AI will still scan without rotating their bodies, we just won't see the awkward animation. At least that's what I took from it.

It wouldn't be that difficult I imagine, just extra work. You choose the campaign from the main menu, it gives you the option to be in a command role or a grunt role. If you play the grunt role you have an AI squad leader who holds your hand and leads you around. If you play the squad leader you're given objectives and its up to you how you handle them like in Harvest Red. Of course I'm simplifying it, there's probably a whole lot of things that make doing that annoying but I'm not an expert.

What does Warmod have to do with anything?

My favorite part of the BAF DLC was actually the easy to use artillery module. I would pay about 5 bucks for a sizeable collection of easy to use scripts and modules that made mission creation much easier instead of having to hunt through the editing forums and then examining the test missions people put in to try and figure out how to tweak it to my needs. I'm stupid, I almost failed computer science, I would love if I could just get some useful things in easy to use modules. They could have it as like the Arma 2: Editors Pack or something. Completely optional for people who don't like to edit but very useful for people who do.

Dude you didn't pay anything for BAF lite, you get that for free, think of it as a demo, if you like what you see in low res you can pay 10 bucks for the regular thing. Not many devs let you try DLC before you buy it.

I've also noticed that trend on System Wars on Gamespot. Typically it goes PS3 has Killzone 3, what does PC have? Then someone responds with pics of Arma 2 and tells them when their shooter has dynamic AI, a huge open world, over a hundred weapons and vehicles, and an easy to use editor with a huge modding scene they can come back and claim superiority.

No. You said something people didn't like and they confronted you about it. Gossiping high schools girls would just get butthurt and call you mean and ban you from the forum.

Compared to console titles I suppose it's not too bad though the PC version was superior. It still wasn't Battlefield 3 though and by the looks of it neither will Battlefield 3.

I honestly don't have a problem with it as long as the PC version isn't compromised. Though I really don't see the console market being as big, even Dragon Rising was a little too much realism for your standard COD gamer to handle.

Huh haven't people been asking for recoil for a while and now that we get it people are complaining?

Rise of Flight - The IL-2 of WW1 flight sims Shells of Fury - The Silent Hunter of WW1 [insert a bunch of low budget strategy titles] Yeah that's about all we're working with.

True that. They at least take pride in their product and continually work on it, interact with the community, and strive to put out quality. Unlike CM who just releases a game, throws out three patches and calls it a day. You better believe they'll do the same with Red River.