Whyfly?

Wait wait wait? So is Fraps also a killer even when not recording? I just use it to show FPS? So without could I be getting like 25 FPS? I'm good with 16 actually but with my new gaming rig I could see me not being comfortable with that speed.

I have This computer (It's crap, but I'm building one Labor day:yay:) So yeah but I am very surprised as how to I can actually play on Single Player with this! Now I just thought about it and I do not change the settings for when I got to MP, so it's crazy how on MP it's even lower but I get NO STUTTER! Pretty awesome but it sucks cause I can't really use the Editor to my expectations. I wanna see tanks exploding, tracers flying, guys getting blown off their feet, nightime battles to make everything stand out and everything, but then I get 8 FPS which is LAGGG!! But 16 is good, and on Multiplayer I'm good too, so wow.

Am I the only one who can play on teen digit FPS? I played the game no problem on my computer on Normal settings with some stuff set to high, and I installed Fraps today and was averaging 16 FPS! Sure that's low but I was playing it? Like I had no problem with lag or anything? Anyone else experience this?

A review, it says i7 is better for many things but the 955 is better gaming. The 955 is the best for gaming, it smokes the i7, just in gaming. If the 955 is better then the i7, then the 965.... will totally surpass. EDIT: Some more

AMD is better for gaming....

You have now stepped.. Into the Twilight Zone. The sound is just amazing IMO.:bounce3:

EDIT:I just saw this website This shows all their fixes in each patch

I've notice the first patches were more visuals and the errors with the game. Performance was somewhat in there, but mostly not. They should do 1.04 as mostly a PERFORMANCE patch, and SOME errors etc. This way people will get off their backs about the game performing terribly on monster machines, and they can focus back on errors and AI problems etc. 1.03 and below-Bugs errors, and minor performance help 1.04-Should be mostly performance so people get off their back. (Also include some bug fixes)

Bumping my post. Can my soon-to-be-Pc run it. Someone probably already posted these specs but I don't feel like looking for them. AMD Phenom II 940 Black Edition 3.0 GHZ PNY Geforce GTX 260 Core 216. G.Skill RAM 1066 DDR2 (4 gigs) Antec 1200 case. GIGABYTE GA-MA790X-UD4P Western Digital Caviar Black 640 GIG And a 600 Watt OCZ power supply. WINDOWS VISTA HOME PREMIUM 64bit. (Upgrade Coupon to Windows 7) I know my computer will be able to run it, but at what settings and with what FPS? What about Vista? I see XP and Windows 7 compared alot but Vista not so much. How will it run with Vista and the one card?

Hi, new guy here. I know there is a thread for this, but no one is responding or anything, and I am getting no help. Here is the rig I'm building. AMD Phenom II 940 Black Edition 3.0 GHZ PNY Geforce GTX 260 Core 216. G.Skill RAM 1066 DDR2 (4 gigs) Antec 1200 case. GIGABYTE GA-MA790X-UD4P Western Digital Caviar Black 640 GIG And a 600 Watt OCZ power supply. WINDOWS VISTA HOME PREMIUM 64bit. (Upgrade Coupon to Windows 7) I know my computer will be able to run it, but at what settings and with what FPS? What about Vista? I see XP and Windows 7 compared alot but Vista not so much. How will it run with Vista and the one card? Is this good? Or will it run suckish? Thanks!

Can my soon-to-be-Pc run it. Someone probably already posted these specs but I don't feel like looking for them. AMD Phenom II 940 Black Edition 3.0 GHZ PNY Geforce GTX 260 Core 216. G.Skill RAM 1066 DDR2 (4 gigs) Antec 1200 case. GIGABYTE GA-MA790X-UD4P Western Digital Caviar Black 640 GIG And a 600 Watt OCZ power supply. WINDOWS VISTA HOME PREMIUM 64bit. (Upgrade Coupon to Windows 7) I know my computer will be able to run it, but at what settings and with what FPS? What about Vista? I see XP and Windows 7 compared alot but Vista not so much. How will it run with Vista and the one card?