p75

I'm experiencing the very same, didn't have that before.

Thanks! ---------- Post added at 08:41 AM ---------- Previous post was at 08:41 AM ---------- Thanks! My main concern was that it would feel odd to turn your head, buit it does not? How long does it take to get used to?

Hi Lads, I'm currently looking at the TrackIr 5 package and was wondering if I only have a single monitor 19" (1440*900) or hdtv (40", 1920*1080) is it worth getting this? Or does one need to have a tripplehead to enjoy it. For those who own one, could you please provide me with your view on what it adds, especially for those with only one active monitor? I will be mainly using it for the helicopters, I just want to check it alittle before forking out 150$.

Try the new drivers, for Nvidia fokes that is, 190.56. Trying them now. Also had some o.5 second freezing when flying around, really odd, but in general Cheranus runs a tad better I would say, except for the 0.5 second freezing which happens as it seems at random.

I have the same, sometimes I just can't correct after a sharp turn and drop out of the sky. Besides that I think the illusion of speed in the air is quite disappointing. It is more like a heatballon.

Great addition! Nice work, mate!

Nice work, looks great!

Good start!

Yes, mate.

.....

Great Thales!

Fiya, you sound like a broken record, who can't accept reality as it is. Your insulting manner of writing is beyond belief and shows some serious character flaws. You sound like an angry teen in distress. Please grow up? Reread my previous post about you, in this very thread related to this topic, as I think you did not fully comprehend their contents ( I don't want to sound like a broken record ). I don't want to start qualifying your level of intelligence and way of communicating as it is simply not worth my time. Take your flaming habits somewhere else. Thank you!

Avagani runs fine, so I think Razani would run fine also.

Sorry, mate, that was certainly not the intention! ---------- Post added at 04:46 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:38 PM ---------- Your approach is bottom up, mine is bottom down. As there many, many factors to consider, I choose for that option, it is debateable what is best. But just simply stating that yours is better is flawed. You seem to be here long enough, maybe the bottom up approach sofar did not work? I'm not alone in this, see results and scope. Anyhow, I value your input, but try to shift your paradigm, it might help?

DM, the question is set in a certain scope. That is just a fact. I'd like to see the numbers as my personal (and according to others, see poll results) feeling is that it will significantly add towards the quality of the product and potentially increase a significant sale boost as it can achieve some penetration from a market where the avionics and missing hud interactions are missed in current form of Arma 2. The engine shows clear beauty, and I'm convinced that it would be technically achieviable. As said earlier, I'm not hear to say it should be implemented now, because of other outstanding issues. And BIS resource limits. I'm here to say however to BIS if people agree that adding this feature will increase the sale base and the uniqueness of the product. I have the feeling that you want to tell me that it was tried before and it was not a success. Well, maybe we should try again and make BIS paradigm shift to see the potential of adding such features. I'm fully aware that other features are more important. However, I think the people would like to see this added, and if so, we should try to get into some dialogue with BIS. About you not being my mate, I'm sorry, it was not meant literally, it was a matter of speech. There are many factors which might compromise such a feature (balancing, technical, financial), that is why I made a simple poll to see what the general feeling is, based on those results one can go into a dialogue and see what is needed so all parties benefit. So, a top down approach, not bottom up. I do pitty the hostility, because it shuts down any form of normal communication.

That is it from me for you, as Fyia you're not able to communicate on a normal level. And take it for what it is. Just a simple poll. Keep the hostility for your own, I don't appreciate that kind of behaviour.

And please keep it on an adult level. ---------- Post added at 12:44 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:43 PM ---------- Thank you for your quick assesment.

Can't help you there, mate, I just grabbed them from their html server. Use a download manager. And put it all (including the core files) into one directory and place a string in your shortcut as in -mod=name of your added directory. Simple as that!

Hi, thank you for your reply. The realistic avionics is another subject although related. Some russian Attack Helicopters can indeed not do that, but I was refering to the AH-64 as seen in the movie and for example the MI28 or other addons which will come. They can acquire more targets and shoot at them in a sequence (ripple fire).

I think BIS is limited in it resources, and an experienced coder will pick it up quicly after some sound advices from their side. And the sourcecode does not have to be exchanged, it is not an absolute must. Besides that, a small contract would solve that issue. And I trust BIS and some beta testers could do some quality testing. Anyway, this is not about discussing what, how and when. This is just about a simple poll as stated earlier. The outcome will depend on the results of the poll

Listen, mate, did I not say we'll discuss it with them. There are soo many factors which why it is not standard in there. It could be alot of things. But I don't believe it is technical limit. We'll need to discuss it with them first. And then we can see when BIS has resource issues if we could deliver some dedicated modder to do the actual coding under the guideance of BIS. Meaning that he can specify what to consider when trying to achieve texture to render while knowing the specifics of the source code. Makes sense? Btw, this is my last comment here, the purpose of this thread is explained clearly.

No, did you read it properly? We just need some help of their knowledge of the engine (an inside peek sort to speak). Well, the point is, if many people want it, we'll make it happen with the help of BIS. I posted this poll to see if there is a serious interest for it or not. Sofar, it seems so. I'm not sure if BIS needs to spend time on it themselves or not. The modders could do it, but what I'd like to do, is, to discuss this issue with BIS. If there is enough appeal, I hope they will help us with providing information as to what and how to change the code to allow render to texture features. After all we don't have any sourcecode. I don't think a whole engine overwrite is needed. The engine seem flexible enough. I think it was more a case of focus. Meaning to keep things in balance and ready for a release date. Really old engines can do it easily. These are some issue which I would like to discuss with them. This approach will allow BIS to focus on the core bug issues while improving the product and its appeal for its fanbase and future customers. This topic has more angles to it than just us as Fans. It also has a commercial value, as some soon to be rival products will allow for this functionality, which will be of influence on consumers when they make their choice if they are bound to spend money for just 1 game. What, how and when needs to be seen. This poll is just a poll to see if people want it or not, I hope this clarrifies my view on things. It could be some addon module, but you need their knowledge as how the current engine operates, not? And what is preventing this feature, besides the timelimit for a relasedate, which was in place.

Well, the point is, if many people want it, we'll make it happen with the help of BIS. I posted this poll to see if there is a serious interest for it or not. Sofar, it seems so. I'm not sure if BIS needs to spend time on it themselves or not. The modders could do it, but what I'd like to do, is, to discuss this issue with BIS. If there is enough appeal, I hope they will help us with providing information as to what and how to change the code to allow render to texture features. After all we don't have any sourcecode. I don't think a whole engine overwrite is needed. The engine seem flexible enough. I think it was more a case of focus. Meaning to keep things in balance and ready for a release date. Really old engines can do it easily. These are some issue which I would like to discuss with them. This approach will allow BIS to focus on the core bug issues while improving the product and its appeal for its fanbase and future customers. This topic has more angles to it than just us as Fans. It also has a commercial value, as some soon to be rival products will allow for this functionality, which will be of influence on consumers when they make their choice if they are bound to spend money for just 1 game. What, how and when needs to be seen. This poll is just a poll to see if people want it or not, I hope this clarrifies my view on things.

Yes, I did, but I'm not asking for individuals to explain why they asnwered No over and over. It doesn't add anything nor does it change the poll. I'm not asking the people who answered Yes as to what their motivation is, because the lists of posts in this thread would be much longer and the No posts would be lost.

Make a profile in your Saitek setup.