sittinGood

^^ old news...

^:rolleyes:

no improvement over the beta here! my specs: Intel Core 2 Q9550 @ 3,3GHz ASUS P5Q-E ATI Radeon 4850 512MB Corsair X2 2x 2GB RAM Still have noticable mouselag at 30-40 FPS and drop downs in singleplayer with many NPCs. Waiting for a Hotfix right now, this game is nice but Betatesting on an unstable game isn't my profession.

My Specs: Asus P5Q-E Intel 2 Duo E8400@3,0 GHz ATI Radeon 4850 512MB VRam 4GB DDR2 RAM Windows Vista/7 64Bit Im going to order a Quad Q9950 2,83GHz to upgrade my rig. What do u think? Is it worth it, or should i get a newer gfx card, or should i stay at where i am atm? thx

yes, i will try some oc'ing. on the other side, now i haven't to upgrade my cpu soon...:rolleyes:

just upgraded! really NO difference! this is a f****** joke. there must be something really wrong with the engine. cu

When will it come out? changelog seen so far? anything new? maybe you heard something?

i'm playing at 1650x1080 at medium to high settings. aa high, af low. postprocessing low. in editor on utes with a few npc i get about 30-40 fps. on campaign manhatten i can't get over 25, feels sluggish too. so i think a cpu upgrade could raise the fps a bit on missions with many npc?

http://www.overclock.net/software-news/536670-g3d-ati-9-7-whql-leaked.html check this out and report ur experience can't test myself (at work...)

I would like to start a thread where everybody can see solved issues without searching through the 25+ sites thread of the armaholic optimisation! This stickied would be very useful too. Posts should contain: -detailed issue -detailed steps for solving -detailed system

^^ no difference on win7 or vista

anyone else testet it so far? no issues so far at my end but no noticeable performance improvement as well

just watched the dev diary on mainpage and noticed some interesting things: -> at 6:29 you can see how the head-textures are white for some secs when switching to 3rd person -> general laggy gameplay (sometimes) so for me it looks like not even the devs themselves can run the game properly. don't get me wrong, this is a great piece of software but i thought i post this to get some feedback about this textureloading problem. cu on the battlefield ps: watch in fullscreen, its easier to see

i dunno but i get no blue led on a trackir5 and newest sw. is this normal, cause i thought there should light the blue leds for arma2? btw, it works fine

so what can i do with an ati card to force vsync off in vista 64? i searched for it but found nothing helpful. i get same fps whatever setting i use too. thx in advance ASUS P5Q-E Intel 2 Duo @ 3,0GHz 4GB Ram ATI 4850 512MB Creative X-Fi extreme music

^ doesn't work.... btw, i tried every argument (maxmem, winxp...), also crysis.exe, crysis64.exe and so on :confused:

ATI 4850 here. Sometimes i get missing textures, but they're loading everytime after a while (few seconds). Most of the time the face-textures are missing. But i do have texture problems: gras textures are loading very slow in front of me while running, also vegatation textures far away when zooming in. ASUS P5Q-E Intel 2 Duo @ 3,0 GHz 4 GB Ram ATI 4850 512MB VRAM Creative X-Fi extreme music All drivers up to date Vista 64 Ultimate

back top topic: i also have this choppy graphics ingame, while it doesn't matter what settings i choose. my fps are everytime around 20, i guess thers something wrong with texture loading, dunno. all drivers up to date. with all i mean ALL. tried all the settings even in config. game runs not that bad, but anything must be wrong due to the fact my settings don't really change my fps neither do resolution settings. i hope this will be sorted out by BI or ATI. great game though. ASUS P5Q-E Intel Core 2 Duo@3,0 GHz 4GB RAM ATI Radeon 4850 512MB MS Vista 64Bit SP2