Leopardi

What about -enableHT command? Does it make any difference?

And multiplayer FPS is dependant on server FPS. This is really sad, BF3 utilizes over 90% of my 6-core CPU and BF4 will even more.

The DICE dev was actually talking about 11.1 having the CPU improvements. So even W8 users will benefit from it... in a couple of years majority will be using 8 and 8.1, and AFAIK there will be no ArmA IV out by then, so investing in 11.1+ support makes sense for me.

http://www.bf4blog.com/battlefield-4-on-windows-8-will-have-better-cpu-optimization/ Is ArmA III going to have DX11.2? The biggest performance problem is the CPU optimization so ArmA III especially would benefit from this.

Is there a way to limit FPS other than some unreliable 3rd party softwares? If the FPS keeps jumping from 30 to 60 all the time it's just unplayable, limiting to a solid 30 would give a much more consistent feel.

What are you trying to say? Doesn't change the fact that A3 only utilizes a third of what BF3 can utilize.

"CPU heavy" is a wrong term, the issue is the utilization. ArmA III uses only 30% of a hexacore when BF3 uses 91%. Basically in BF3 a normal 3000MHz CPU is a 9000MHz CPU because of better optimization. If the A3 engine was that good utilizing the CPU, it'd be just as smooth as BF3.

I posted in the wrong section so I'll just link it here: http://forums.bistudio.com/showthread.php?150857-Text-editor-invisible-with-dark-forum-theme

Yeah there really is no excuse, BIS just needs to get their shit together and make it work - it's possible.

Firefox 19.0.2 Very slow to hover your mouse on each selection to find the option you want.

Yeah don't expect 100% with a quadcore or hexacore, but expect 91.1%. http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showthread.php?t=18459152 If ArmA III won't be able to even utilize 75% something is reaally wrong with the code.

ArmA 3 FPS would skyrocket if utilization was this good. Too bad we can't even get 50% of this utilization level, gotta admit EA can do at least some things right.

Zoomed FOV should not be configurable past the default limit, then it's good.

Negativity is understandable, since this problem has been out there for years unfixed.

There is no excuse, look at Frostbite 2 engine, I can get 100% GPU utilization easily in it, with 100% utilization for CPU main thread and like 75% for the rest. ArmA 3 just gives 85% for main / 30% or less for others. GPU is bottlenecked down to 20-30%. There clearly is a problem with the engine and it needs fixing or you'll only have people with 4.5GHz OC'd newest Intels playing this game.