smookie

Yes it's true, but it is due to circumstances stated earlier (game balance). Is it a real problem?

Never say never pufu :)

Remember that due to engine's nature fluid stance change (via mousewheel) is nearly definately NGH. So either a cover system or call of duty style fighting. The greatest part of this is that RO2 cover system is activated, that means you really dont have to use it (rendering your arguments about not being fond of getting stuck to wall useless) if you don't like it.

Mods? You gotta be kidding me :) *double wink*

I am sorry but unless there is someone to help me out with this, changes will not happen due to lack of time. You will have to wait until July next year ;)

BF3 - disappointment (Call of Battlefield is a good name for this). Average graphics, great lighting, great physics, highly addictive, but totally illogical, unrealistic and most of all - frustrating after an hour or so. Not saying it's a bad game, for its genre I think it's one of the best out there. If you look for logical, natural gameplay, dont try this one!

that^

Hence the idea of removing the aiming rectangle in the center which is responsible for telling you where exactly is the bullet going to land. You can do it currently in ArmA2 by adding attribute showWeaponAim = 0; to most of moves. Try reffering to blindfiring (notice the rectangle disappears but you can still see the crosshair showing you general direction of the gun) in my animations pack.

@Brutus404 Your suggestion is very good. It's not on topic though. I dont think the crosshair is the real problem, it's rather its accuracy.

Why turning sandbox game where you can do everything into a medal/unlock arcade?

This is a spot on. ArmA animations clearly show the soldier is not firing from the hip but with his rifle shouldered. While I agree the accuracy is way too perfect (i am one of the players who _never_ use sights) and I can easily hit targets 600 m away with just a couple of bullets using M16A2 ingame, I don't think drastic changes should be applied. Rather perhaps bigger crosshair area minus the comma which serves at the moment as direct hit point. Did you mean bollock?;)

hi guys, sorry for lack of information. the project is currently halted since I am contracted with a lot of animation work of higher priority for multiple game projects and i simply dont even have time to sit down on this one. if anyone has some config/scripting skills and would like to at least fix the most irritaiting bugs, please pm me so that i can get you into the project. regards, smk PS your waiting time should hopefully be rewarded with some really good stuff somewhere next year ;)

Oh rite, the tons of female players that are going to play uber-realistic simulator ;)

Recent posts are really disturbing :). As per stealth kills, for the time being my best guess would be NGH.

Nothing. Its perfectly enough I would say. Unless you wanna extremely high settings.

Great choice of topic! As mentioned before, high end GPU and 8 gb of RAM should be enough to enjoy the future game.

I must say, I was waiting eagerly for this game and now I regret paying for it. It's just wrong, full of bugs and weird solutions, it doesn't feel either realistic nor arcadish to me.

+123054315534184

The cattle poo :)

Its not an assumption :)

If your ArmA2 OA runs at (at least) 40 fps+ on high or max details, it should run ArmA3 without choke on a one level down settings (med or high)

Noted: add support for rudder pedals in ArmA3 movement. :)

Mouse wheel movement and mouse gradual adjustments are way out of the league at the moment.

I am all for this idea. A mode where 3rd person is turned off and crosshair is enabled will stand as a base for PvP / competitive gaming scene and I will try to lobby that. :)