Potatomasher

Check the language patch folders Addons & dta. There shouldn't be any other files than language related files.

I noticed just the same after patch 1.02. :confused: I ordered my team to mount truck, but when i clicked the get in button my guy says watch in that direction. Tried multiple times. Also now i got multiple CTD:s after patch. Before that my game didn't crashed once. I use english language mod, but it's in the mod folder so i don't think that would be the cause. Update: In fact it was the language patch. Who ever compiled the language files had put files like core.pbo and other shit that doesn't shouldn't be there. I deleted them from the folders and now it works like before. I don't know what the guy who created the language rar was thinking. There was core.pbo, bin.pbo and product.bin. No wonder it conflicted with the game.:mad: Though i'm glad i got the language files i need. ;)

Yes that's just ridiculous. Who ever believes in such a crap is a ... I mean how possibly could renaming some exe change a shit. :D

That's sad news for me. I bought the german downloadable version because i thought the game will be supporting english language aswell with the coming patches. Guess i have to use those beta language files and live with that. :(

I tweaked my PC a little more. I had 3gb mem before in single channel and got 1605 at arma mark. Today i removed 1gb and now i have only 2gb but in dual channel. What surprised me was that i got now with the same detail levels score in arma mark 1860. That's pretty amazing increase. I guess dual channel is a must have even though i have less mem now. Now i'm going to bed. Too drunk. Hpefully when i wake up in the morning i can download the patch 1.02. If i don't, then i'm "ugly in the morning" ;)

I run eveything on normal and PP very high with average 20 fps in campaign and MP. Editor and armory runs at 30-40 fps. Specs below. Similar than yours.

Don't believe them. Just all that i'm saying. Arma 2 is best BIS had done so far. And now some more

I think i have to stop reading these new impressions because there seems to be enormous amount of idiotic people giving impressions now. "Arma 1 was better" and all the other crap. Makes me angry. Or i'm just too drunk so my nerves are a bit of short.

Yeah Razorman's one of those 60 fps guys...

Nonsense. That can wait. What i wait most is this and how this affects performance or does it. Improved terrain shape beyond map borders

Size of the patch isn't important. Bigger the better of course, but i do hope it get released today and not in the near future. I'm anxious to see is BIS managed to improve the performance of the game...

I didn't even know there are quad cores that slow 2.2ghz. What where the guys at AMD thinking when they decided that...

I'm sticking with 190.15 beta drivers. No graphical errors or anything, even the performance FEELS just a little better than with those 185.xx.

My crystall ball says it won't be here until early next week. :couch:

20-30 unplayable and 30-40 poor. Jesus. I know that even some of the X360 console games are designed to run at 30 fps. Like RacePro. You aren't easily satisfied. I would be very happy if i would get that 20-30 stable. And one thing, i must be partly blind or something but if i see say like 50 fps game and next to it 60 fps i won't fucking recognise the difference. I totally understand Helmut's angry but you i don't get.

Just noticed there's new forceware drivers out. They are beta though... again... http://downloads.guru3d.com/GeForce-ForceWare-190.15-Win-7-|-Vista-(64-bit)-download-2309.html

Don't be. He just fooled you.

Totally agree. I have come to the same conclusion. There must be something wrong in the engine. Difference between very low and very high is too minimal. Only thing that matters is fillrate. If i put it to 200% my game turns in to slide show 1-5 fps. :D

Adapter 0 (\\.\DISPLAY1): NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT VM to SM (Download): 514.38 MB/s SM to VM (Upload): 675.28 MB/s That 9800 GT is 512mb PCI-E card so my score is fine i suppose ?

I think that's one hell of a achievement already. After all we are talking about metacritic here. Usually the average games got pretty bad ratings there even when the game was ok. Only the mainstream crap games like COD4 & whores of war gets good ratings. Let's see what happens after english release. Hope it doesn't go lower...

Yes that test is full of shit. They use the fillrate 150-200. That kills the performance no matter what kind of monster PC you have. 100% fillrate is just ok until proper AA patch comes. ---------- Post added at 01:34 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:30 PM ---------- With low details i'm sure you get that 20-30 fps. Maybe even normal details.

I just tried this. Normally i use 1280 x 1024 res with my 17" LCD. Now i lowered it to 1024 x 768. fps increased by 1. :) Looks ugly and runs 1 fps better so not worth it.

Anyone else thinks that the red harvest campaign was too soon over ? I really liked those missions where you chase Lobotev & Bardak and the manhattan missions, but those couple of last warfare missions i didn't like. I would have wanted more of those sandbox style missions. And there wasn't any mission featuring HALO jump. I thought that of course there would be one where you are transported deep in the enemy territory and need to jump from the plane. Well, i guess new bigger story driven campaign is something BIS or community can do later when they have patched and finished Arma 2.

Hahah. You noticed the old granma back there. :D

Or pretty demanding about fps. 9800GT is basicly 8800GT with new name. I can use these details with my setup. fps is about 20 +-5 http://img32.imageshack.us/img32/4468/arma22009060921111383.jpg