Peter_13
-
Content Count
75 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Medals
Posts posted by Peter_13
-
-
Skaven
It's not a military PM, it is a commercial IZH-70 (look at sport rear sight) with US import markings on left side and set to SAFE mode. One of textures of the right side is a mirror of left side and have mirrored serial number and shadow of non existing part.
-
Skaven!
Please look again at picture from ramb0z post.
There is a cover with ventilation holes over barrel, not a "fat" barrel.
-
"Large numbers of AKM's were rechambered to fire the AK74's 5.45 cartridge to enable standardization of supply without discarding mountains of AKM's."Can I ask where you read this? Don't think that it could be done in Soviet Union. Too much parts need to be changed or reworked, it cheaper to make a new AK-74.
-
That's too bad, I'm still waiting for L-39, TU-154 and other great modells...
Maybe you can give unfinished modells to team like RHS or some other if they promise to finish them?
Very bad news, really.
-
Where can I read or see what units/vehicles are still placeholders?
-
I found a website with good Ak-101 pics if anyone wants to model oneDon't use that pics as reference, they are US converted SAIGAs to look close to AK100 family - not the real military guns, even don't have folding stocks and some other correct parts.
-
Never saw something worse than this pack
Really a piece of sh*t. -
It looks like texture mapping in rear gear area is wrong.
-
-
He-He... I know Tantal's pages and can understand why he writes PSO-series, PSO-type scope and don't showes real markings on them. Everybody know PSO, but who knows about PO and POSP scopes and who will buy them?
Just a little trick... -
Quote[/b] ]and
PSO-1 8x42
btw:propably you are right,but they are all look almost the same
If you look better at 2nd picture you'll see markings
POSP
8x42D
Made in
Belorussia
s/n ..........
-
Sorry, but all PSO-1 scopes are only 4x24. This scope is 8x42 so it can't be called PSO-1, it only can be Russian PO 8x42 or Belorussian POSP 8x42 (on your photo).
-
Hi MAA!
It's not PSO-1 (4x24) on your pics, maybe PSO-3, maybe something like PO 8x42 or POSP 8x42.
BTW, nice pics and good idea to show new weapons
-
Any chance to see some pictures of L-39?
As I remember, there were pictures of all units long before release of CSLA I. Why now we can't have pictures of all CSLA II update 1 units?
-
DKM Jaguar
I think RHS need to equalize the level of detalization of T-55 and T-62. Maybe by adding details to T-55? There is another way - to remove some details from T-62... But I prefer the 1st way.
-
T-62 looks much more detailed that current version of T-55. T-55 will need upgrade to level of T-62
-
I am no Rushkie Â
Who are Rushkie? Don't know them...
-
Vodka totally destroyed Keller's sense of humour...
-
oh keller  and before you say anything about the drivers hatch kenji knows its incorrect i pointed that out to him after he showed me the textured version.I'm not Keller, but I'll say that much more part are incorrect...
Raedor please look at pic Img_1903 (If you don't know where are they, then ask ShadowNX)
-
Hi TomiD!In USSR this plane was known as Su-17, only export versions were called Su-22. Also I see that Su textures are not so good as on your other planes.
Su-7 - Original version. Fixed wing geometry.
Su-17 - Upgraded version with swing-wing tips.
Su-20 - Export version (of Su-17) with avionics changes.
Su-22 - Export version (of Su-17) with engine changes.
All have the same NATO codename: 'Fitter'
More correct version from the Soviet point of view
Su-7 (S-22)
Su-17 (S-32) with engine AL-7F-1
Su-17M (S-32M) with AL-21F-3S
export Su-20 (S-32MK) with AL-21F-3S
Su-17M2 (S-32M2) with AL-21F-3S
export Su-22 (S-32M2K) with R-29BS
Su-17M3 (S-52) with AL-21F-3S
export Su-22M (S-52K) with R-29BS
export Su-22M3 (S-52M3K) with R-29BS
Su-17UM (S-52U) with AL-21F-3S
export Su-22UM (S-52UMK) with R-29BS
Su-17UM3 (S-52UM3) with AL-21F-3S
export Su-22UM3 (S-52UM3K) with R-29BS
export Su-22UM3K with AL-21F-3S
Su-17M4 (S-54) with AL-21F-3S
export Su-22M4 (S-54K) with AL-21F-3S
-
Hi TomiD!
In USSR this plane was known as Su-17, only export versions were called Su-22. Also I see that Su textures are not so good as on your other planes.
Edit:
The correct name for Soviet version is Su-17M4.
-
Edge
I think that adding a pair of poligons near the right side of tail with 1 additional texture in first LODs will not be a big problem for your MOD. Can't understand why you are making hi-res textures (you won't notice that during gameplay) but can't correst this small bug...
-
Hinds still have mirrored "OPASNO" on the right side of tail? I think this needs correction before release...
Why no pics of L-39?
-
I don't think any of the addon-makers have made a Mi-24P before, so you should be the one to make it.Never saw them in CSLA MOD?
PROJECT'85 TOPIC
in ARMA - ADDONS & MODS: DISCUSSION
Posted
Shadow NX
Your Messenger box is full, clean some space for some more links.