Key Dutch

there is another thing, 7.8 and 7.9 CCC not recomendated for AGP based cards, causing lots of  problems. http://www.sapphiretech.com/en....2&pp=10

man u not need have 8800 to run game. i run ArmA on 1400x1050 resolution all game textures and details on higest lvl with AA x2 Adaptive AA On/preformance AF x 16 with High Qualaty AF On and its run with out problems, nice and smoth.

well, when i OC my CPU for only 5%, i had 800 points incrise in 3DMark05. and its from 2.4 to 2.5 MHz, by all calculation its must give 3000+ points

No... My 5000+ never shows over 60% on a single core with ArmA. ill tell u tomorrow. but if look at 3DMark05 with AMD Athlon 64 X2 4600+ my system scrore only 13455 points. hope new CPU (6000+) will incrise preformance considerably.

hmmm, intresting. i just order Athlon 64 X2 6000+, should come tomorrow. wonder if its give visible  incrise in preformance, in ArmA.

your going to change your mind about vista when all games become DX10 compatable. your going to need vista so dont be a XP fan boy and later cry for the need for vista  LOL,  btw DX10 run nicly under XP, just use ur hands, if not for rebuild it, alteast for searching net. there  u find DX10 for XP. anyway, DX10 games, fully DX10, would not be relised for 2-3 years. as long DX10 was relised risently, all game, wich in develompment ,will base on DX9. plas  Game companys not stupid lose money, to relise games only for DX10, how many peeps have DX10 cards? probably only 4% out of all gamers. there ur ansfer, there would be at least 2-3 years, plas its just enouth time for Microsoft patch all holes in Vista, would not be surprise if they relise, by this time, new Windows. there for no point rush and by DX10 cards, by this time they will relise another 2 genurations.

Yeah, sure. Every other software I use, works fine on 64bit Vista. Also I'll lose 1GB of memory with 32bit XP. actauly u lose not 1Gb, u lose only bout 800MB RAM on XP , and if take in acount Vista request duble ammount RAM than XP, u will ,actualy, square on RAM.

i dont know if someone allready advice this, if yes, im sorry. dual booteble disk Vista and XP that would solve ur problem.

i belive Arma, run better on single video card and single core CPU, than on any of  latest dual or quad core CPU and SLI/CrossFire cards, look like its do not support dual and quad core CPU. same with video cards, u have better prefeormance form single card then from SLI/CrossFire configuration. there for solution,use single video card, and if u have dual/quad core CPU, for better preformance u can OC ur CPU. from all what was sed is concluded, Arma was not build for: 1. Vista 2. SLI/CrossFire 3. Dual/Quad core CPU

its not software unfriendly, its peeps hands grow from wrong place. or they fogot install drivers for them. (hands.sys) i feel ok with my rig, manage run with max.details with 1600x1200 resolution , AA x2 (with Adaptive AA "ON"), AF x16 (with High Quality AF "ON")

yeh, for star u can read this : http://overclock.net/amd-general/91-ultimate-overclocking-guide.html

hmmmm strarge, i run game on 1600x1200 with max details on x1950xtx uber-limited edition. and its go just fine.

from ATI tech.Inc. there was special offer 789$ for 2 x X1950XTX uber edition (one of them CF ready)

cant use tool tray, its block my vidio card speed. in 2d my card have 506/594(1188) Mhz in 3d its have 700/1100(2200) Mhz and if i use tool tray, its block clock speed at 2D setting , even for 3D. X1950XTX uber edition have diferent BIOS compere with standart X1950XTX

look there is to many companys, and to many dev.teams , each use they owen enging, and if they ignor Crossfire/SLI technology, its hard for ATI/nVidea to fix they overlooked mistakes. its same with AGEIA PhysiX cards , if game do not support this future, u can do whatever u want, but its not gona work. i belive development of Arma was started B4 CF/SLI apire widely on market, that why its do not support this configuration, same with STALKER , its do not support too, couse its was in development for 4 years.