Jump to content
Bohemia Interactive Forums

Kode

Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    275

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Medals

Posts posted by Kode

  5. Posted

    Quote[/b] ]I am not asking for mind-blowing performance, just the lowest level. The game started with the auto configuration, then I changed it to the lowest settings. Still no change. Which is why I am here.

    I just sayed that your card is below minimum requirements, so there is a possibility it just not might run decently at all. confused_o.gif

    Is your screen filling with the crappy pie chart(I love the description smile_o.gif) instantly or only after a certain time?

    Also the thing that didn't help you at all was just to say you have only the choice between ATI/NVIDIA. ATI isn't a bad brand. I had also good experience with it. You just happen to have a cheap graphics card(and it's also in a laptop so performance is even lower this in exchange for better battery life).

    To disable auto-install, you could go to your control panel, administrative tools, then to services, there you have to look for plug and play, right click properties, put that on disabled. Then uninstall driver, reboot, install new driver, put the service back to automatic, reboot and it should be done

  6. Posted

    Unfortunatly, it is impossible for me to do so because Windows automatically detects and installs its default drivers for it upon restart.

    So you are blaming ati for a windows problem? You should try to install the new ati-driver over the old driver.

    Also note that the M X1300 is also below the minimum specs. This means you should put everything on the lowest to start with.

    ATI is a good brand, but you only have to buy a more powerfull one tounge2.gif, of course there is Nvidia aswell. Choice is up to you.

  8. Posted

    I waited 3 months or more for someone to reply to this topic..now its getting spammed : P

    Well I think not that many people had the game back then (or were constantly playing:) )

    Perhaps you better put it into the wishlist? http://community.bistudio.com/wiki/ArmA:_Wish_List

    I have no problems with my logitech force feedback, I just had to adjust because it was too strong at start(so a bit oppsosite) Nevertheless, it's always nicer if you are able to configure it in game (if possible). Then you don't have to mess around with it if you play another game.

  10. Posted

    Yeah, people all narrowing down to that CO2. But there're also many other things like mentioned above, and freons and all that shit ,,, Some indicators are suggesting that the proccess is already irreversable, and that it can happen that in four-five (300 years) generations all will be over, and I mean GAME OVER for the human kind.

    Just like any other life before... also 300 years is more like 10 generations.

    We are all speaking of accurate data here. But even the graph is not accurate. How can we base global warming on something that shows only 400k years while earth has had at least 165 million year of life(and so also a lot of changes). Lot's of life has stopped, new has come.

    Don't forget that earth has been warmer then today, even the oceans have been higher then now. but still life was possible...

    Now if you know that the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere is about 0.035%. Is it possible that a "small" change can have such a huge impact on temperature?

    Somehow, nobody ever discussed differences in space yet, although I mentioned them a couple of times. They are rather useful. For example when comparing venus and earth. Venus' atmosphere has almost 100% CO2. Although, it isn't 10000 times hotter then earth. Venus is an example of how it went wrong, as there is nothing left of water that once was there.(And don't say woman came from venus and industry was incredibly advanced, but that they produced huge amounts of CO2 crazy_o.gif which caused venus to become uninhabitable)

    An interesting site perhaps: global warming on venus in perspective

    Fact is, every planet, everything is still changing. In nature there is no constant.(There is perhaps for a certain period,but it will always change)

    And fact is that no scientist wants too lose their funding.

    Don't forget that the earth once was flat(although their was proof) and after that that the planets and the sun were turning around our planet. This is the same story(in my opinion).

  13. Posted

    Get yourself an empty helo, fly up north all the way you can go and see that you are coming in on the map from the south again.

    That´s why you can hear the vehicles. Arma world as OFP world is flat, if you peak behind corners you show up on the opposite side  smile_o.gif

    huh.gif wouldn't that be round? If you get at one side you come to the other side, like in our real world doing a full turn around the world. If it would be flat, you would just fell off, no?

    Anyway never encountered this. Good to know some people do smile_o.gif. So if I wanted to create a mission with the sound of artillery, but nothing in the immediate vicinity, I could just put it on the other side of the map and hear it?

    It seems strange because I always thought that if you flew out of the map, you just kept seeing water.(or is it only sound doing that?)

  15. Posted

    ok, I just played it again. You don't even have to board the truck if you come close it completes aswell. Now are all your objectives completed? you can check that when you are at the map.

    Make sure that you sneak into the base, as otherwise you will fail the objective to infiltrate the base, and then it might not end.

    Also, depending on the game mode(cadet/veteran) do you see the objectives, the yellow boxes that point at the objectives, otherwise you might want to follow that.

    if it is all completed and still not ends then you perhaps should restart it completely, and perhaps in cadet mode to see the boxes so you are sure you didn't forget anything?

  16. Posted

    ok, I just played it again. You don't even have to board the truck if you come close it completes aswell. Now are all your objectives completed? you can check that when you are at the map.

    Make sure that you sneak into the base, as otherwise you will fail the objective to infiltrate the base, and then it might not end.

    Also, depending on the game mode(cadet/veteran) do you see the objectives, the yellow boxes that point at the objectives, otherwise you might want to follow that.

    if it is all completed and still not ends then you perhaps should restart it completely, and perhaps in cadet mode to see the boxes so you are sure you didn't forget anything?

  17. Posted

    Ok, we both agree the CO2 level increases. But not on what it does.

    Quote[/b] ]Having proved the causal link we now know CO2 contributes to paleoclimactic temperature changes.

    Now that is the first point, it's the other way around. Temperature contributed to CO2 in the paleclimatic changes. To be more precise they did even react on eachother, sometimes CO2 changing and then temperature or the other way around.

    quoted from this site.

    Will the increased CO2:

    -Have little effect on our temperature because of effects that compensate by rejecting more heat - like an increase in reflective clouds?

    -Cause our climate to get substantially warmer?

    -Result in a runaway greenhouse effect like that on Venus?

    If you want more info about the greenhouse effect on Venus you might want to go here.

    My point is, nothing says that CO2(or greenhouse gases) is causing the temperature to rise, or will it let it rise in the future. My goal is to let people see, that the global warming thing is completely hyped, and that most scientists (working in global warming) gladly have the lot of money support they are getting(and increasing each year).

    As stated before, I would prefer governements spent more to other, also vital research. And what I hate the most is that these days, all politicians use it to promote themselfes (that's all I'm saying off politics before I get  band.gif   whistle.gif )

  20. Posted

    hey again,

    Well you made a nice list of all things. There is a relation between the current temperature rise and the increasing CO2 level. But is it influencing the temperature? And how come the CO2 level rises? The humans produces a lot of CO2, but nature itself produces more then humans...

    I think that the temperature controls the CO2 levels. Perhaps it has to do with an increased activity of the sun(which is quite hard to measure, as we don't have much data about it from before the seventies.) and yes, we do know that on other planets, temperature has increased aswell.(see previous post)

    Because of this CO2 could have been released from the oceans for example.(this is just an example/theory!wink_o.gif

    Also a vulcano eruption only cools the planet for a "short" period, being, depending on the power of the eruption, 2 to 20 years(maybe even more, because som eruption were really powerfull). Also a huge amount of CO2 is being catapulted in the atmospehere aswell, so if you 'd say that CO2 would warm up the earth, why wouldn't it cancel the effect of the ashes?

    I'm talking of CO2 a lot because people blame only CO2 for the global warming.

    edit: Just found this pic:

    800px-Vostok_420ky_4curves_insolation.jpg

    In here you can also see methan (CH4) and solar variation. There is one thing I'm sure of: the future will give us answers smile_o.gif.

  22. Posted

    His work is on sunspot activities altering weather not climate, which is the subject of this debate, and has proved very lucrative for him; though he has not published his methods for scientific peer review, I stil respect his expertise in sunspot activies affect on weather.

    So here you say that the sun can impact the weather, if it does that, why can't it impact climate? The sun isn't a constant thing. It changes all the time. Your barbecue story in T-shirt in february is true for this year, it was a warm winter in most of europe, but in the US, they had a really cold winter. And previous year was also cold here.

    Also temperature hasn't increased only on eath. On mars, and I think even other planets, temperature has also increased from 1970(the start of the rising) to now with approximatly the same temperature of 0,5°C on our planet. source

    This might point directly to the sun again. CO2 is perhaps rising but it's not affecting temperature. The temperature decrease from 1940-1970 is a very important timeframe which doesn't fit in the CO2 rises, temperature rises theory.

  23. Posted

    Baaaaaaaaaaaaah!

    While this may sound a bit like the noise a sheep would make, it also represents the opinion of a lot of people : let me live my life, no matter what sacrifices may be needed.

    The global warming debate as much as others only annoys most people (who are, by the way, ready to put an end to some bad habits).

    In my opinion, the debate about global warming is important, as a lot of people are just plain wrong. I'm not doing this because I don't want to change my habits or anything. I want that the huge amount of money that is going into the research of global warming partly goes to more important research like processing of nuclear waste or pollution or agricultural improvements, faster computers, space-exploration,....

    @Red kite: it was my pleasure wink_o.gif. I'm always happy to support people that(I think:p) are right. And I'm happy to share my knowledge, what some people luckely appreciate smile_o.gif

  24. Posted

    please don't tell to me that you are agree with the theory, which said, that the cows are guilty  crazy_o.gif

    Well partly cows are indeed guilty! We are guilty, all life is guilty. You and I are made from CO2! So it's logic we release CO2. Even if leaves fall from the trees in autumn, while the nature is processing them, they are releasing CO2.  Without carbondioxide we wouldn't even be living.

    Also vulcano-eruptions release a massif amount of CO2. A lot of CO2 is stored into the ground, and then I'm not speaking of the amount of CO2 that is stored into the oceans. Give me 1 good reason why life wouldn't produce more CO2 then industry, knowing there are more then 6,000,000,000 people on earth, and a LOT of animals and trees aswell.

    I don't know the exact number an animal or human produces, but if you count that up, you get a bigger number then industry which is at 6,5 Gigatons of CO2.  I think the amount life makes is at around 150 Gigatons of CO2. It's not a theory, it's a fact...

  25. Posted

    @walker: yes, CO2 is related to temperature, but CO lags 800 years behind temperature. So first you have an increase in temperature and only after 800 years you have an increase in CO2.

    The fact that temperature changes happened is not irrelevant. The temperature only started rising again after 1970. Before that, from 1940 to 1970 the temperature decreased, that's 30 years that the temperature decreased, and this in the post-war economic boom, where the industry grew incredibly fast, with a huge increase in CO2.

    CO2 doesn't influence temperature, but it's the other way around, temperature influences CO2.

    Also do you know who/what emits the most CO2? If you think it's us humans, you are completely wrong.

×