Kep Kelagin

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (denoir @ Dec. 25 2002,23:29)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Kip Kilaganâ„¢ @ Dec. 25 2002,23:17)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Lol, your right, but the main thing is the same; the pic is as "horrible"or explicit as my link is m8, just dont see the difference...And thats what I wanted to know of the moderator who removed the url in my post.<span id='postcolor'> As Tex said, if you have a problem with the moderating, PM a mod. Now as for the link: It was a direct violation of the forum rules. If we played it by the book you would be banned now. Since it is christmas and all, we decided only to give you a warning. Be happy and don't bitch about it  <span id='postcolor'> Well, for the 2nd time, I havent got a prob with a moderator, and i aint bitching either, ur the one biching, and if u got a prob with me ,u should PM me as well...stick to your own rules.And for the link, i know it was bleedy and all, but isnt the pic of the girl who got overrun by a deer not just as 'explicit' as my link ?Would be nice if u could explain, as i already asked before.. Try to keep the same rules for all, ok? And for banning me; go ahead, just act like it isnt Xmas Â

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Tex [uSMC] @ Dec. 25 2002,23:19)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">if you have an issue with moderating, PM the mod in question<span id='postcolor'> I havent got an issue with a moderator, and thx for telling, u dont need to act like one. Anyways, I PM back Ralphwiggum, as he PM about the post, and when checking the post after reading the PM of Ralph, I saw the comment of Denoir in my post. Since he didnt PM me , I just post inhere . Now u know. And next time , dont act like a Mod, ok Tex ? Much appreciated...

Lol, your right, but the main thing is the same; the pic is as "horrible"or explicit as my link is m8, just dont see the difference...And thats what I wanted to know of the moderator who removed the url in my post.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Kip Kilaganâ„¢ @ Dec. 25 2002,16:56)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Link showing (fake) explicit mutilation removed.<span id='postcolor'> Yup, thats true, but still no reason to delete the link... I mean, in the post above my post, there is a pic of a woman ( fake ) wich has been shot in the face... Now u tell me the difference plz.

Link showing (fake) explicit mutilation removed.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Die Alive @ Dec. 24 2002,16:32)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">I just heard that there was a major earthquake in North Korea. Oops, it was just the starvin' population of North Korea stomachs grumbling all at once.  Think I'll go buy a ten pound bag of rice and throw it into a dumpster....  Merry Christmas North Korea.  Remember don't eat the Christmas tree, that tinsel isn't to good for you  -=Die Alive=-<span id='postcolor'> Like everyone in the US have plenty to eat and can pay their bills...

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Warin @ Dec. 13 2002,21:23)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (DarkLight @ Dec. 13 2002,20:55)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">That's rather nasty...<span id='postcolor'> Criminals dont have scruples about who they hurt or how they hurt them. Personally I love the idea of there being a special place in hell for criminals that kill/maim law enforcement officers.  Hopefully with lots of sharp things and sadistic minions tormenting said scumbags  <span id='postcolor'> Great idea; mabye put them with the corrupt cops in one place in hell

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (denoir @ Dec. 14 2002,19:01)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">But I digress. We have an Iraq topic already  <span id='postcolor'> Well, I didnt started on Iraq, just commented on your post....

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Harnu @ Dec. 14 2002,17:32)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">The only real reason for a war in Iraq is oil, and to distract the Americans from their own problems in their own country...And Bush seems to be doing really well on that....<span id='postcolor'> Don't even start... Â <span id='postcolor'> Just saying what I think , if u got problems with that, just dont read it, and dont bother to comment...

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (denoir @ Dec. 14 2002,06:31)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">http://www.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/meast/12/13/iran.nuclear/index.html </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The United States accused Iran Friday of "actively working" on a nuclear weapons program and said that recent satellite photographs of a massive nuclear power construction project "reinforce" that belief. State Department spokesman Richard Boucher said two facilities seen in the photographs "are not justified by the needs of Iran's civilian nuclear program." "There is no economic gain for a state that's rich in oil and gas like Iran to build costly nuclear fuel cycle facilities," he said. "I point out that Iran flares more gas annually than the equivalent energy its desired reactors would produce." Boucher added: "We've reached the conclusion that Iran is actively working to develop nuclear weapons capability." But International Atomic Energy Agency Director-General Mohamed ElBaradei, in an interview with CNN's Christiane Amanpour, said the chief of Iran's atomic energy program had told him in September that the construction was for a 6,000-megawatt nuclear power facility. Gholamreza Aghazadeh also said that Iran planned to declare the facilities to the IAEA and would welcome IAEA safeguards, according to ElBaradei. The Iranians invited ElBaradei to bring an inspection team to look at the sites, but a visit scheduled for this week was postponed until February by Iranian authorities. U.S. officials told CNN Thursday that the United States had evidence Iran had been secretly constructing large nuclear facilities that could possibly be used to make nuclear weapons and that the IAEA had not been able to visit them. Commercial satellite photographs taken in September and obtained by CNN show the construction near the town of Natanz and another near Arak within Iran, one of three countries President Bush has labeled an "axis of evil." (View map) "The circumstances are fairly interesting and lead to the conclusion ... that this nuclear program in Iran is not peaceful and certainly is not transparent," Boucher said. Iranian officials disputed the charge. "I can categorically tell you that Iran does not have a nuclear weapons program," said Mohammed Javad Zarif, Iran's ambassador to the United Nations. Iran has one publicly declared nuclear program at Bushehr -- what its government says is used solely for peaceful purposes, to produce electricity. "Iran hasn't committed any acts that can be considered against international rules, and will not do so in the future," Hamid Reza Assefi, a spokesman for the Iranian Foreign Ministry, told CNN. "At the same time, no country could, for its own political objectives, prevent Iran from achieving its own goals." "This kind of publicity is not new," he said. "Certain circles within the United States are trying to create tensions and poison the international atmosphere, and to avert international public opinions away from the real regional danger, which is Israel." Boucher said the two facilities "reinforce our already grave concern that Iran is seeking technology to produce fissile material for nuclear weapons." The IAEA commissioned the satellite photographs after an Iranian opposition group talked about the construction at a news conference in August, ElBaradei said Friday. "We saw them, we asked the Iranians about them, and they said, 'yes,' and invited us to visit," he said. "I wouldn't say it was 'weird' " that Iran had not at that time notified the agency of the construction, he added, "but it would be nice if they had told us earlier." "The suspect uranium enrichment plant, for example, could be used to produce highly enriched uranium for weapons," he said. "The heavy water plant could support a reactor for producing weapons grade plutonium." The facilities near Natanz and Arak are of particular interest to the agency and will be part of the February visit, IAEA spokesman Mark Gwozdecky said. "Everybody's looking at the same satellite photos," he said, "and they're consistent with the facilities being alleged -- one is a heavy water plant and the other a uranium-enrichment facility." "But that's not the end of the story either," he added. "Iran is entitled to have these facilities as long as it declares them to us and allows us to put them under our safeguards." <span id='postcolor'> Just a random thought: perhaps this is the real reason for the coming Iraq war. Iran would be too strong and dangerous to take on now while they obviously pose a higher threat to the world then Iraq. So it can't hurt to have military bases in Iraq in case action is needed. Well, I'm probably just paranoid, but it makes sense to me  <span id='postcolor'> The only real reason for a war in Iraq is oil, and to distract the Americans from their own problems in their own country...And Bush seems to be doing really well on that....

Ignore it; the ASE will still be useable after the 21 days...

Another thing u cant do in Flashpoint.

Isn't this offtopic ?

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (advocatexxx @ Oct. 21 2002,17:16)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">It is the most realistic combat sim out there. Â It's made up of mature, dedicated audience. Â We're not 12 year olds rushing to the store each time a new Final Fantasy is released. Though others like Battlefield 1942 have tried copying the same game principles (large open terrain and vehicle/infantry control) they have, in my opinion miserably failed. Â Sure vehicles are very arcadish in Flashpoint, but at least they stick to the basics (multi-man crew commanding tanks, etc), while in BF1942 you can single-handenly command an entire Battleship ? Â C'mon.<span id='postcolor'> U cant compare Flashpoint with any game, cause Flashpoint is a game unique in its genre. I dont think that Battlefield was ment as a war sim, but more in the style of the Deltaforce series, or any other shooter game. Nothing wrong with them, in fact, I even like them But don't compare Flashpoint with them

Nice dirt-bike Harley ( wich I posted already several times , but I can't get enough of it ) :