FSPilot

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (LauryThorn @ July 23 2002,12:47)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">That is only if he wants to play games.<span id='postcolor'> Ok, so what is operation flashpoint?

My point was that when you're talking on a radio, most of the time you've already thought out what you're going to say. It's actually a step they reccomend you take before you transmit. Just so you don't trip over your words on the air. So if you already know what you're saying and it's just a matter of saying it, it won't be hard to think of something else. At least it isn't for me

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (bn880 @ July 23 2002,03:07)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">What the heck is this? Â Did you not read my posts? Â READ! Â Why are you saying you can still think while talking? Is there lead in your water?<span id='postcolor'> Don't be stupid. You're saying "it would be nice to be blocked when giving a command so that you can not select another until you finish saying the first one," Which means you would not be able to select a command while you're still saying the first one. That makes no sense, because you can still think while you're talking. Why can't you get that?

Trained to not have emotion!? Thats the biggest load of misinformation I've ever seen. Soldiers, whether an infantryman or a special ops agent are regular people who are trained to fight. They still love their familys, they still have a sense of humor. Emotion usually doesn't get in the way of a job.

That's funny, I thought I already asked. I just worded it wrong. Going through the giant process of determining who is qualified to go to what political positions isn't of interest of me. I just want to make sure it's done so I don't have people who don't know what they're doing in office.

DoD is getting better, but it's still a deathmatch. i'd only play if it were realistic i'm talking realistic classes (everyone in world war two did NOT have a BAR), realistic weapons (no more toe-kill shots), and besides, it uses the half life engine. not very good graphics ifyou ask me.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Paratrooper @ July 23 2002,03:20)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"><span id='postcolor'> Again, I didn't say that. I just said it was stupid to talk about something you didn't know about. Which, in retrospect, I didn't really do. I just vocalized my opinion on it.

Bah! Basically, it goes the same for you all too. Unless of course you're formally trained in politics.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Warin @ July 23 2002,02:28)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"><span id='postcolor'> </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">The basics of free speech is that you have the right to criticize the government without being part of the political system<span id='postcolor'> I didn't say people didn't have the right to do so, I said it would be stupid to. </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">The basics of free speech is that you have the right to criticize the government without being part of the political system<span id='postcolor'> Again, I'm not talking about voting. </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Prefering professional politicians before 'regular' citizens as representatives is the same as prefering an ruling elite. The politicians are supposed to be representative for the population.<span id='postcolor'> In my opinion, a "professional politician" is a representative for the population. </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Because in spite of the glaringly obvious fact that Mr Bush is NOT highly intelligent, and in fact is of rather mediocre intelligence, knee jerk republicans like yourself feel this inane need to defend him and try to point out his brilliance.<span id='postcolor'> Well, what about all the "knee jerk" people who criticize and doubt every single action the president takes? I don't mean to be a "knee jerk republican" and I'm sorry that you think I am. But I'm tired of seeing the president being mocked for nothing more than being a bad public speaker. How can you not see that? IMO, political mistakes are generally a matter of opinion. For example: pro-choice people are not going to like this decision, and are going to call it a mistake. But some political mistakes are real mistakes that even Bush-friendly republicans can point out. Those kind of mistakes I won't defend with any vigor. But stuff like this really ticks me off. </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Are you trained in politics?<span id='postcolor'> No, but does that take away my right to talk about it?

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (denoir @ July 23 2002,01:56)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"><span id='postcolor'> No, no, and NO. </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">i dont know why people who have absolutely no political background, training, or education besides what they see on CNN think they're fit to judge the president of the united states.<span id='postcolor'> That in NO way says anything about freedom of speech. Just because you don't know what you're talking about, doesn't mean you don't have a right to say it. I was saying that people who aren't trained in a certain field, but still talk about it like they are, are stupid. </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Uneducated people making important decisions is the fundament of democracy? I certainly hope not.<span id='postcolor'> I'm not talking about voting. Citizens didn't vote on this decision did they? So what I said has absolutely nothing to do with voting, does it? </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">educated as in people that know what they're doing, yes.<span id='postcolor'> That has nothing to do with an intellectual elite. I'm simply against professional wrestlers being elected into office. And Lazarus, the only funny thing about this is how highly they emphasize simple semantics.

You're right, I don't understand. If you're using pre-determined commands, why wouldn't the AI be able to understand you?

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Paratrooper @ July 23 2002,01:54)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Who decides who is 'educated' and who isn't?<span id='postcolor'> People who have any amount of political training are educated, people who don't, aren't. It's just that simple. If you didn't go to high school, are you educated? </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">As for putting words in you mouth, we don't need to. Your ideas directly contradict the US constitution.<span id='postcolor'> You're telling me that I said things that I didn't say. My ideas don't contradict the U.S. contstitution. The ideas you're saying I said, are.

So the army is going to be flooded with people who can't think and talk at the same time?

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Paratrooper @ July 23 2002,01:43)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">From what you have said, you don't strike me as a highly educated person. What if you had no rights in this autocracy you propose?<span id='postcolor'> Resorting to childish insulting are we? Â That's very mature of you. </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">You said that uneducated people should have no right making importrant decisions. You even said that uneducated people should not have the right to criticize the president of the united states. Right? That's two constitutional violations.<span id='postcolor'> Once again, stop putting words in my mouth. Â I never said either of those things. This is pathetic. Â Neither of you are making any arguable points. EDIT - and I think I saw a double post on both the 3rd and 4th pages. Doesn't make any difference though.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">So you are saying that you are against the Amercan constitution? That's very un-American of you.<span id='postcolor'> Uneducated people leading the country is not in the constitution. Â And no need to double-post </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">1. Thats not an opinion it is a fact. 2. Rule by an 'intellectual elite' would be tyranny<span id='postcolor'> It's your opinion that you hold as a fact. Â And being led by trained politicians is not a tyranny. Â Don't twist my words around. EDIT - </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Well he said that he is against the democratic voting system where everybody has the right to vote, right? <span id='postcolor'> I didn't say that. Â Stop twisting my words around. Â It defeats the purpose of arguing.

I already asked a question like this. Didn't get a very good answer. Basically they told me to "read the readme". which didnt help any i recommend that, if the readme doesnt help (yes, you should read it), email the maker and ask him/her. maybe they left something out and assumed everyone knew it or something like that.

I already asked a question like this. Didn't get a very good answer. Basically they told me to "read the readme". which didnt help any i recommend that, if the readme doesnt help (yes, you should read it), email the maker and ask him/her. maybe they left something out and assumed everyone knew it or something like that.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (denoir @ July 23 2002,01:20)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (FSPilot @ July 23 2002,01:18)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (denoir @ July 23 2002,01:16)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Just a shot in the dark: perhaps because that is the fundament of democracy?<span id='postcolor'> Uneducated people making important decisions is the fundament of democracy? Â I certainly hope not.<span id='postcolor'> No, uneducated people making importrant decisions that's Bush. Uneducated people voting for uneducated people that get to make importrant decisions - that's democracy.<span id='postcolor'> Well, that's your opinion. </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">So you think only "educated" people should have the franchise? <span id='postcolor'> educated as in people that know what they're doing, yes.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (denoir @ July 23 2002,01:16)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Just a shot in the dark: perhaps because that is the fundament of democracy?<span id='postcolor'> Uneducated people making important decisions is the fundament of democracy? I certainly hope not.

well i hate abortion and like bush, so i'm happy i dont know why people who have absolutely no political background, training, or education besides what they see on CNN think they're fit to judge the president of the united states. now THAT's stupid.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Jamesia @ July 22 2002,22:16)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">why didn't he just get along with the russians?<span id='postcolor'> Maybe because they killed his family?

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (bn880 @ July 22 2002,22:12)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">BIS could make it so that when you are still blabbing a command you can't even select the next one... that would be even more real.<span id='postcolor'> but you can still think of what you're going to say when you're talking. especially if it's on the radio.

I know what you mean. Especially in the tanks. I'm muzzle to muzzle with a T-80, I give the command to target it... "Target T-80, 05 1" My character has to say all of that before the gunner even starts to rotate the turret. Then I click to fire... "Move to, 05 1" NO! My mouse wasn't in the right position. 1-1 "Keep formation" "Fire!" *boom* It just takes too long. The in-vehicle radio should take priority over the outer radio, which is stuff like enemy callouts "Soldier, 4 o'clock" and stuff not very important when you're about to get shot.

Should I go out and by resistance? It sounds like it's just a new campaign with new weapons and a few vehicles, so is it really worth paying for?

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (redundant_fool @ July 22 2002,12:09)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">I have a pentium 1 with 166 Mhz processor, 96 Mb RAM, and Windows NT. What do you think?<span id='postcolor'> No offense, but you seriously need to get yourself a new computer.