EiZei

Damn, this just reminds me of some soviet propaganda I read a while back regarding finland during winter war which talked about "finnish leaders whose dreams of conquest reach even the urals" and so forth.

I suppose "from israel" getting written on those munitions might be a bit of a giveaway..

Could be a service branch or some other military logo?

And way too subtle and stylish for a 3rd world flags.

What videos? Broadcasted on Israeli news? I remember such videos after 9/11 of people cheering that the American Devils had been killed. Turned out a few weeks later that most of those videos were fake in one way another. It could be a planned set by the journalist so s/he could have the most chocking news, or it could be archive footage of something completely irrelevant - or something else just as stupid. Bummer, isn't it? Actually they were: http://www.snopes.com/rumors/cnn.htm

It's like BF yes.

Jesus. Fucking. Christ.

If we are truly talking about some extremely small and poor communist state even shilkas might be on the newer side. ZSU-57-2s on the other hand..

Yeah, it's all about us loving fans.

About that, I have to ask - What do mean by that? I will not continue discussing this in this thread, hell, I would'nt even made the initial reply if I had noticed it was the war against terror thread.

Gunning down soldiers who are trying to help their own or run away? Unspeakable!

More like Madrid.

Is the methodology (sampling, questions used etc.) used in that 3-year-old poll described in detail somewhere?

Just out of curiosity, what other replacements for the harrier brits could have used?

Yeah, who needs that pesky 4th amendment anyways. I was referring to locations such as Syria, and Iran. All those kind and friendly nations. But they are not merely monitoring calls to/from "suspicious countries" but recording information on every call made by customers of those telcos involved in the program. My dear EiZei, You totaly missed this part: And you seem to be missing the simple point that the phone calls themselves are not being recorded, just who calls to who, when and how long. You could easily fit millions of that kind of records on a 90e single consumer hard drive. Uhh.. you totally missed this two months ago? You might want to start reading more newspapers.. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NSA_call_database http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2006-05-10-nsa_x.htm http://www.forbes.com/technol....ty.html http://msnbc.msn.com/id/12779087/site/newsweek/page/2/ So, check back in couple of decades then? (well, in the unlikely event they have'nt found some other bad guys to replace terrorists)

Id say a western fighter aircraft that costs less than 50 mil a pop cannot be massive waste of money.. well.. massive at least.

Yeah, who needs that pesky 4th amendment anyways. I was referring to locations such as Syria, and Iran. All those kind and friendly nations. But they are not merely monitoring calls to/from "suspicious countries" but recording information on every call made by customers of those telcos involved in the program.

Does'nt the war on terror thread cover chechnya as well?

And we will be flying hornets well in to the 2010's.. oh well.

Every... boy where do you get you're info from? Looks here like your stuttering too. Imagine, there are 298 MILLION people in the US. How much time and how many men do you think it would take to listen in on all conversations. THINK! The information observed would turn up weeks later! It is impractical to even think that. Now international calls on the other hand would take less time but I'm sure there are still many many calls to sort through. The thing that even seems remotely sensible is that the government is looking at phone calls from questionable locations. Who said anything about the actual calls? The data that NSA was collecting was call records not the calls themselves on massive scale. Yeah, who needs that pesky 4th amendment anyways. Ooh, this is almost retro.

At least he had the decency to apologize. Fuck, think they could afford to be little less obvious.

Sounds awfully rationalized for a crazy religious extremist for me.

Sounds like standard piss-poor commie hermit kingdom issue to me.

When you are fighting a nuclear war with sixties technology against united states you really don't go for the counterforce targets.

Uh.. I think the german campaigns in blitzkrieg RTS games usually started there and there even was a winter war tutorial scenario for soviets(!. And of course there's always hearts of iron 2:dd for those 1936-1952 sessions.