Eviscerator

they are possible, but for little gain, and a complicated install, if the total conversions added something new to the engine then it would be justified but sticking your logo on the ofp menu screens doesnt justify the extra download or the complicated install

they are possible, but for little gain, and a complicated install, if the total conversions added something new to the engine then it would be justified but sticking your logo on the ofp menu screens doesnt justify the extra download or the complicated install

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Leone @ Feb. 07 2003,04:42)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">*resists urge to bitchslap Oxpacker again* Operation Gulf War Crisis is working hard to bring you a total conversion of OFP. We released a little demo to show you some of the things we are doing. Rest assured the final version will be out this year, and will be awesome We are planning it as a proper TC, not just a bunch of addons...... Operation Gulf War Crisis Site is down currently 07/03/03 (thanks to bloody host....grrrrr), but will be up again ASAP.<span id='postcolor'> A 'total conversion' for ofp is not a good idea, before you even start counting the addons you would need to include a modified: Data3D, Data and Sound pbo, thats 150mb without counting islands, or campaigns (resistance campign is 63mb), not only that but theres the complicated install, and all this just to change the opening menu and where the units are in the editor, with an addon you dont need to do any of this, you just put them in say, 'Men (Desert)' or the equivalent for the other classes and use any missions from there, in this sense the nam pack is a total conversion, you can have missions where you dont need to use a single unit from the normal ofp, and its only a 48mb download, id like to see any 'proper' TC mod top that download size and better the content significantly, the only advantages i can see from a TC mod are that you get new snazzy menus and units in 'Men' instead of 'Men (Desert)', and the OPGWC 'little' demo was 310mb

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Leone @ Feb. 07 2003,04:42)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">*resists urge to bitchslap Oxpacker again* Operation Gulf War Crisis is working hard to bring you a total conversion of OFP. We released a little demo to show you some of the things we are doing. Rest assured the final version will be out this year, and will be awesome We are planning it as a proper TC, not just a bunch of addons...... Operation Gulf War Crisis Site is down currently 07/03/03 (thanks to bloody host....grrrrr), but will be up again ASAP.<span id='postcolor'> A 'total conversion' for ofp is not a good idea, before you even start counting the addons you would need to include a modified: Data3D, Data and Sound pbo, thats 150mb without counting islands, or campaigns (resistance campign is 63mb), not only that but theres the complicated install, and all this just to change the opening menu and where the units are in the editor, with an addon you dont need to do any of this, you just put them in say, 'Men (Desert)' or the equivalent for the other classes and use any missions from there, in this sense the nam pack is a total conversion, you can have missions where you dont need to use a single unit from the normal ofp, and its only a 48mb download, id like to see any 'proper' TC mod top that download size and better the content significantly, the only advantages i can see from a TC mod are that you get new snazzy menus and units in 'Men' instead of 'Men (Desert)', and the OPGWC 'little' demo was 310mb

Some wallpaper images for you, click the thumbnails for 1024x768 images. Images taken by Nagual.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Leone @ Feb. 07 2003,12:24)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">this is something I've been thinking about posting for a while, and this seems a good opportunity. I think it would be good for us (and the OFP community) if we at OPGWC could "reserve" the tag "ds_" for our addons, just like DKM and BAS seem to have done for theirs. If other mod teams could do the same, and maybe we can set up a thread/database on these forums, it might help everyone when it comes to downloading stuff. Say one thread, with one post each from each mod team listing their addons, the names of them, a link to a website. When each team releases new stuff, just edit the post. What do you guys think? And if I see one more re-skined M1A1...........<span id='postcolor'> this is already there....its called OFPEC

.50AE is not .50BMG, the AE is a pistol round (albeit a bloody huge one) it still doesnt compare to the 12.7x99mm .50BMG (a la M82A1 or M2 HMG), from what ive heard something like a 50BMG in an assault rifle would have a hell of a lot of recoil

i think you should make a resistance side one, its a small and (relatively) cheap IFV, and if you do could you see if you could get it to match the colourscheme on the Lavos MT-LB's, then we would have not only the APC's and AA APCs but also an IFV, also if you are looking for ideas as to what to do next, an infantry helo would be good, something like a KA-60 Kasatka would keep in line with the russian weaponry, or a KA-52, or the latest russian tank (T-95 i think although probably not any 3 views for it), im sure the community would be very glad if we had some modern russian addons to go against the plethora of western addons, anyway, fantastic addon, and you have unbelievable texturing skills!!

the large majority of them are unsuitable, they dont have LODs or they have too many polygons, or just dont work right in ofp (as the normals may get messed up on import), its a lot easier to make it yourself...

it isnt made in the config, its made in the simulations, which are hard coded, so we cant do a thing about it

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (STS_SolidSnake @ Feb. 04 2003,22:52)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Eviscerator @ Feb. 04 2003,21:16)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">edit: rap, it doesnt look like a reskin to me, looks like a brand new model<span id='postcolor'> You can download the cs model here, http://www.counterstrikecenter.com/ <span id='postcolor'> i wasnt denying it was a cs converted model, i meant it wasnt a reskin of the AWP, but rap has told me 'skin' in the cs world includes a model...which is just strange....

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Miles Teg @ Feb. 04 2003,21:50)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">I agree, the weapon pack should be seperate. Â Units should come with stock BIS weapons so that mission makers can better customize their missions. Â However if the new BAS weapons pack is good, then even if it's not required by the BAS Spec Ops units, I think most people will still use it. Â Myself I was never quite satisfied with the Flipper M4 packs... they were good, but they didn't look like what I typically saw used for modern forces, plus they were a little too fat looking... not that they weren't good models and made with a lot of skill...just not what I was looking for to make missions with. Â However the BAS M4 models look a bit more modern I think and a little better proportioned from what I can tell. Â So I'm looking forward to this weapons pack ESPECIALLY if they make it where their units do not REQUIRE it in order to work. Chris G. aka-Miles Teg<GD><span id='postcolor'> they do require it, i think if they were made to just use BIS weapons it would alienate everyone that wasnt a mission maker, i myself cant be bothered to remember the weapon names, remember the proper code to make soldiers use them from typing in the init field, it seems like far too much work when all i want to do is have a quick game, so on one hand it may be good for mission makers not for the soldiers to require the weapons to work, for the joe bloggs gamer it is what would be wanted...

this addon is not the normal sniper rifle found in cs, the awp is a 7.62 (and varius other calibers, .338 etc) rifle, the AW50 (what the model is) is a 50 caliber rifle edit: rap, it doesnt look like a reskin to me, looks like a brand new model

im not sure why hes called it an AWP, its an AW50

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (ViperCheese @ Feb. 03 2003,23:32)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">please do not laugh at me, but what is 'aimpoint'<span id='postcolor'> The Aimpoint range of scopes are for CQB, they are scopes with no magnification and designed for two-eyes-open use i believe, they project a red dot so that when the user walks round pointing the gun he can see the red dot and know the bullets are going to hit there (like a quicker set of iron sights) Aimpoint Comp ML2: </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">i dont know if it is appropriate to ask but will the units have a sidearm? im trying to edit some of the pre-resistance units so that they have a sidearm but i dont know the exact process <span id='postcolor'> The units that would have sidearms in real life will have them blackdog~: as far as i know we are fine for hosting the initial file, im not sure how the whole mirroring thing is going to work, i suppose there will be details closer to the release We are also now not going to comment too much on what might be in there, or lots of details on what is there other than what Tigershark/Damocles (our Producer/Co Producer) release, leaves a few surprises in there for you

you'll have to wait and see

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Cloney @ Feb. 01 2003,20:19)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Is it a coincidence that BAS and The NP team have many of the same people?<span id='postcolor'> Well, no, SelectThis and I have been on the team for a long time (although him much longer than me), after the nam pack work was finished i asked Ebud if he fancied doing some BAS work and he joined, so now all of the SEB Team are on BAS, and the texture work by Ebud on the deltas/rangers is astounding

i think the original quote was misunderstood too, i think what he was trying to say is that with the marines, rangers and deltas in a pack along with the weapons would be great for mp, or something

ok, just talked with our guy on the inside, and the 75th regiment (one of the ranger regiments) has adopted the reflex sight, so they are standard issue on all M4's and are also fitted to M249's occasionally

from what ive heard theyve switched to the M4 SOPMOD, most of the US army is switching the M4 i've been told instead of going on to the M16A3/4

erm, mr. Duck im pretty sure an avatar of a handjob isnt allowed, infact i think it is an instant ban...

well, the thing is....i believe (from talking to some real life army guys at bas) they wouldnt use just an m4 + M203 if they had the chance, otherwise we just would have made an M4 + M203, depending on different situations they would use a variety of scopes/silencers/lasers/vertical grips/SOPMOD/M203/Masterkey attachments, as i said to make a realistic ranger/delta pack we need these weapons, and they are all in one pbo, and future weapons will go in this pbo so mission makers wont have to hunt out .pbo's

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (andy_aws @ Jan. 31 2003,19:07)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Some of the new weapons sound really great.... But here comes another dozen M4's..... <span id='postcolor'> well, yes, but at the minute there arent M4's out that simulate the SOPMOD and the sights properly, so to have realistic Deltas/rangers they need these M4's

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (STS_SolidSnake @ Jan. 31 2003,16:49)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">looks like Eviscerator is the master of flame wars  j/k<span id='postcolor'> well, not only was it a long time ago, but what i was saying was misunderstood, and both times i havent started the flaming, the tunguska was a beta and i was offering my views on what could be improved for the final version... As i said earlier, the flaming neednt have happened, none of the bas members were posting on this thread until jahves comment, and the TOW members went onto a BAS news thread and took an innocent (true) comment and started flame baiting, i shouldnt have replied and started arguing, but i was angry at them for degrading our addons and posting pointless comments.

There is a chance there will be an updated KLR with the BAS Rangers