Eviscerator

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (2stoned2kil| @ Mar. 31 2003,16:37)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Shashman @ Mar. 31 2003,13:41)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (2stoned2kil| @ Mar. 30 2003,17)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">You ever heard of a sign called point  (.) <=== ppl use it to end a sentence  <!--emo&<span id='postcolor'> "punctuation" not "sign". "Full stop/Period" not "point"  <span id='postcolor'> U tryin' to correct me mr. Perfect  <span id='postcolor'> Are you trying to correct me, Mr. Perfect?

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (ExtracTioN @ Mar. 31 2003,15:29)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Is someone working on the (C/M)H-53 choppers?<span id='postcolor'> Yes

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (edc @ Mar. 31 2003,01:37)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Tigershark posted this: </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Guys/Gals...thanks for all the postivie comments and constructive criticism. A few points: - The SOCOM...didn't make it into release but will appear in a weapons upgrade patch in a couple of weeks - The M24 NV model, as ST mentioned was removed until we can refine it. - We plan to further improve some weapons textures and bug fixes....expect an update in 2-3 weeks. Enjoy them! <span id='postcolor'> You can go here if you want to verify that. I hope you  get them done soon, because the new guns look neat! <span id='postcolor'> Well, I didnt say two weeks , but anyway it wont be out soon, the guys are concentrating on the SEAL's atm, and the MH-47/MH-60 etc

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (edc @ Mar. 30 2003,20:40)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Didn't you say about 2 weeks when the rangers and DF were released? <span id='postcolor'> no

From the sounds of it you arent making an MI-2 armed with just a machinegun (Either PK or something heavier), this is sorely needed to match the UH-60 w/ MG

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Miles Teg @ Mar. 29 2003,19:02)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">3. Â Did British forces use the Beretta pistols during that conflict?<span id='postcolor'> No, i believe the standard issue british forces pistol back then was the Browning Hi-Power

Because they are most likely used about as often as an umbrella in the Sahara...

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Shashman @ Mar. 28 2003,20:25)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Hmmm...why was a Challenger 2 destroyed by another Challenger 2 then if they have this IFF device? Tchss... Â <span id='postcolor'> Since when was it destroyed? It was attacked but i havent heard of it being destroyed...

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Well if invading other country to save your own failing Goverment is done by bad guys...and bad guys are in the East block....that means that USA is in the East now and so England as USA allied ...so if UK is in the East....Argentina is in the West again....<span id='postcolor'> Firstly, i dont think the US Government was failing at all prior to the war in Iraq, probably at an all time high post-9/11(or 11/9 as it should be), there are also vastly different conditions to just compare the falklands conflict with the current gulf war, firstly the people on the Falklands were not oppressed prior to the invasion, they were not tortured, maimed, or sent into exile, also during the Falklands Conflict the UN passed a resolution ordering Argentina to withdraw its troops, which they did not do, forcing the Royal Navy to sail thousands of miles to force the invaders to surrender, if the UN passes a resolution ordering the coalition forces out of Iraq then maybe you can compare the two, but seeing as both the UK and the USA have veto power i cant see that happening...

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Oberon3d @ Mar. 28 2003,11:04)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Geographicaly.... Argentina is west...England is East... End of discussion About the language....if they speak spanish and their Flashpoint version is in spanish...why are they going to make it in english?... You know...english is not the only language....<span id='postcolor'> Where do you base your 'geographically' point from? If we use the Greenwich Meridian (0 Degrees Longitude) then about 4/5ths of the UK is west and some parts of London and East Anglia are east, so youre statement isnt wholely accurate, as i could say Egland is west and then go all the way round the world and say Argentinia is East... And they should have followed the unspoken rule in ofp modding and put all 'Western' (ie NATO members or just primarily western countries) on West, and the rest on East, or on Rsistance if they need to fight both East and West. And on the topic of good guys and bad guys, i think there is no doubt that in the Falklands Conflict that the Argentinians were the 'Bad Guys', they invaded a country only to try and save their own failing junta regime, the people on that island want to be under british control no matter how much the Argentinians call it the 'Malvina's'.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Oberon3d @ Mar. 28 2003,11:04)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Geographicaly.... Argentina is west...England is East... End of discussion About the language....if they speak spanish and their Flashpoint version is in spanish...why are they going to make it in english?... You know...english is not the only language....<span id='postcolor'> Where do you base your 'geographically' point from? If we use the Greenwich Meridian (0 Degrees Longitude) then about 4/5ths of the UK is west and some parts of London and East Anglia are east, so youre statement isnt wholely accurate, as i could say Egland is west and then go all the way round the world and say Argentinia is East... And they should have followed the unspoken rule in ofp modding and put all 'Western' (ie NATO members or just primarily western countries) on West, and the rest on East, or on Rsistance if they need to fight both East and West. And on the topic of good guys and bad guys, i think there is no doubt that in the Falklands Conflict that the Argentinians were the 'Bad Guys', they invaded a country only to try and save their own failing junta regime, the people on that island want to be under british control no matter how much the Argentinians call it the 'Malvina's'.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Lt_Phoenix @ Mar. 27 2003,13:51)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Here's the real thing More info about the FAV at: http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/land/row/wolf.htm I'd love to see Frandsens FAV updated. Maybe use BW_MOD's Wolf as a basis<span id='postcolor'> Actually, yes and no, the 'FAV' comes in several different versions, as lots of vehicles are fast, and can attack :/ First the M151 FAV was used (Jeep W/ Mg), and while waiting for whatever comes in the future the USMC are using IFAV's (Interim Fast Attack Vehicle's) which is a version of the wolf, however the Navy SEAL's and the Marine Force Recon use the Chenowth FAV(DPV), Hummers are also used along the way but both the Hummer and the Chenowth FAV can not fit in a V-22 which causes problems for the USMC. This page has more on what comes next, named the ITV(Internally Transportable Vehicle): http://globalsecurity.org/military/systems/ground/itv.htm http://globalsecurity.org/militar....064.jpg [edit: Image was over 100kb, also infact so is the picture of the Wolf]

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Silent N Deadly @ Mar. 26 2003,04:53)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Does anyone know what effect it has with the Tail upside down? Does it effect the performance? How? It does look cool! <span id='postcolor'> I'm not 100% sure but it looks like the tail was turned upside down so it wasnt hit by the 'pushing' rotor blades at the back, you can see them on the museum type pics i posted, but if you look at one of the pictures blackdog posted there is no rear pushing rotor and the tail is up.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (STS_SolidSnake @ Mar. 26 2003,12:16)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Eviscerator @ Dec. 18 2002,22:17)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">in the next week? that was 11 days ago, what calender do you opgwc boys go by?<span id='postcolor'> a better one then bas...<span id='postcolor'> we dont go by eta's...so how can we be late?

It looks turned upside down for good reason, because the real one has it turned upside down, the AH-56 Cheyenne was the winner of the US Army's Advanced Aerial Fire Support System (AAFSS) program (1964-71). The helicopter won the competition and the first prototype flew (unofficially) in September 1966. AH-56 was expected to enter service in 1968, but the program was terminated and the helicopter never advanced beyond prototype stage. The AH-1G was selected to fill the role instead as it was cheaper, smaller and less complicated, the same program later created the AH-64 i believe. Some pictures: Some over 100kb: http://www.internetage.com/cartercopters/othercraft/ah56a-lc1.jpg http://www.9thcav.com/AH-56.jpg

It normally occurs when you are missing the .pbo with the weapons the unit is using are in, its happened some other times but with the ADF troops thats probably your problem.

I think there are a couple of differences between the Wessex/UH-34, the main one being the Wessex has a turbine engine and the C/UH-34 has a piston engine, so if you decide to make a USMC UH-34D then you might need to rethink the exhaust positioning (not sure if theres a difference, but there probably is), either way, great model!

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (chaztheducky @ Mar. 21 2003,06:19)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">the m1a1\a2's armor is still classified. lets just say though its the toughest in the world by FAR. it just kicks ass. dunno about the m2a2.<span id='postcolor'> Ahem, the Challenger 2 is renowned for being the best armoured tank in NATO, and seeing as we (the brits) make the armour used in the challenger, challenger 2, M1A1/2 then i think itrs very probable we'll keep the best for ourselves

Bloody thing...since when has a German Navy Tornado been more needed than an RAF one?

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Jahve @ Mar. 19 2003,11:36)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">I thought the NVA didnt have airsupport<span id='postcolor'> the north vietnamese air force had a lot of equipment, cargo planes, fighters/ground attack Mig-15/17/19/21 and SU-7, the helicopters were normally hidden, but they did have them and used them.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (KaRRiLLioN @ Mar. 19 2003,06:41)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">So I guess it'd be unrealistic to use the Mi-2 for some NAM missions eh? It's an awesome addon BTW.<span id='postcolor'> No, the NVA had a few Mi-2/4's. Enough to warrant their use in a game...

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (~Too Tall~ @ Mar. 19 2003,05:41)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Eviscerator @ Mar. 18 2003,16:10)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Nam Pack 2 By Ebud, Bibmi, Eviscerator, SelectThis  (SEB) This addon requires the OFP Resistance version 1.85.<span id='postcolor'> I dont think it could have been much more clear than that...<span id='postcolor'> shouldnt it be SEEB Select this E-bud Eviscerator Bibmi<span id='postcolor'> No, seeing as SEB is SElectThis and EBud squashed together, its a tag from yonks ago, bibmi joined to work on the first pack, started to work on the second but his work got lost, and i joined on the second, but the tag stayed the same. And it doesnt just need resistance, as the readme states it needs 1.85

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Nam Pack 2 By Ebud, Bibmi, Eviscerator, SelectThis (SEB) This addon requires the OFP Resistance version 1.85.<span id='postcolor'> I dont think it could have been much more clear than that...

Did you get an email from the author allowing you to release it? That 'readme' is from an alpha he gave out to 4-5 people in january, NOT releasing it, so until there is confirmation please remove it from your site as im sure he would not want the public to see an unfinished product...

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (johnnylump @ Mar. 18 2003,04:35)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">/Me/: Thanks Evis for the site plug. Â <span id='postcolor'> heh np, its a great site for finding links quickly when trying to help people find an addon, or for someone looking for addons to download, so great job