CsonkaPityu

http://www.videogamesblogger.com/2006....ent.htm http://kotaku.com/gaming....122.php Has anyone else heard about this? CoD going modern... to a setting that has nothing but low intensity engagements... i wonder how the iraqi insurgents are gonna do trench fighting... >_>

By that I meant that he's not on the ground... Not that flying choppers is a worthless thing. I'm not blaming them, they're out there for months in the dusty sun and not a single brothel in sight, crappy KBR food and 99$ for washing clothes, Haliburton not cleaning their water, asshats like me telling them on the internet, hairy arabs that have no access to water. I'd be pissed too. But lets stop acting like US soldiers are modern day Saints.

Hey I'm sure monty himself is a great guy, i mean he just flies choppers but lets face it nice US footsoldiers are the exception not the rule...

... ok? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t3UrVRCojJs http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e1zrss0fwmM&NR=1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fy_BSksdvAM And that's just stuff that doesn't get deleted off youtube... aww i keep finding more nuggets... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v....search=

In all honesty i think armed assault and its 6 year old engine just suck now... They should just turn their attention fully to G2 after releasing the mod tools. If the AI, graphics and physics in G2 are as bad as in ArmA or if they even remind me of it it's gonna be one bad game... i ordered a T-72 and a BMP into a village and it was like watching pinball. The vehicles in arma are far from simulation level, tanks do not have SUO (or well they always have it turned on), range finders, different optics. The cars driving model is also just terrible, not realistic but it's a pain to drive for sure. The setting is also just amateur stuff, the buildings are badly textured and there is no infrastructure present, not one hospital or school or police station or fireware dept., anything at all. The unit choices are also terrible for armed assault, BIS didn't do any research whatsoever they just used their old unit lists and added a stryker. If the above mistakes get made with G2 too than ok fine keep supporting ArmA i guess... but if G2 will be better then by all means lets forget the arma and move on.

Actually the reason he hates immigrants (mainly muslims) is because he's hungarian and greek. No two people hate turks and muslims more then hungarians and greeks. Centuries of hate for all things brown in both countries... mainly because the turks tried to wipe us out. O.o The turks here in hungary don't even dare say they are turkish... they call their doners gyros. :O

I can't believe the french voted in Sárközy. He's like a french speaking Gyurcsány... Same pro-american attitude that all corrupt eastern european politicians have (american "marketing agencies" probably helped his campaign)... and the same hypocrisy.

What's with dolphins and this extra special treatment they deserve? Is it because of Flipper?

Actually that's not too far from reality... If you see mortar rounds hit the ground near you you automatically try to get out of there since the spotters are probably correcting the coordinates so the next volley will be ontop of you. Now if you're dug in it's not that big of a problem, but if you're out in the field you can't allow a mortar barrage to hit you. Plus long range artillery shells/missles need a little time to travel to the target.

Some info: http://www.joystiq.com/2006....rorists That's the cheesiest storyline i've ever read about... and the game will lack russians (great, Chechnya is just begging to be made into a tactical shooter). My interest is plumeting.

You could make it an RPG where you talk to a buncha people, make alliances/enemies, try to persuade others to join your cause, go on tiny fetch quests. You could go on dangerous quests to get better equipment, like for example you would have to sneak into/raid an Iran funded shiite militia's compound to steal some SA-7s or better RPGs and IED materials. All this in a living breathing middle-eastern envirioment. You could also mix in some GTA action. It could be done. 1 star level: iraqi police, 2 stars: iraqi police with better equipment, 3 stars: iraqi national guard, 4: us troops with airforce, tanks and everything else to make your day a bad one.

The trailer had russians in it so i'm interested afterall. O.o

Oh... well atleast it's news it'll get revealed at some american football draft this Sunday or what. Couldn't find a topic on it here so i thought it's unknown. But I really don't understand how they wanna bring that frantic, over the top, action movie feeling over into modern combat without turning it into some ridiculous game version of a B action movie.

Looks great. But i think i'm seeing 2D backgrounds as part of the skybox... which would mean the areas in OFP2 would be small unless they heavily modify the engine.

And here I thought VBS2/Game 2 was new from the ground up and had little to nothing in common with the old OFP engine... silly me... sorry for the whole swearing part, my blood pressure's high because of exams. >_<

ArmA uses Real Virtuality 1. Stop spreading horseshit.

ArmA's engine is not the game 2 engine... where did you get that idea from? i think you would be wrong there, look at the early arma pics they looked like a VBS1 on drugs then it changed to the VR2 engine which was orgianal game 2 theres posts and thingd about it somewhere.. bit too drunk to find out atm ArmA is using the old OFP engine. Game 2's engine has dynamic building destruction. ArmA is still that VBS1 engine on crack. edit: Read my lips: ArmA is using the old OFP engine.

ArmA's engine is not the game 2 engine... where did you get that idea from?

I think Codemasters and console players in general have a different idea of what is realistic and what not then the rest of us. Console players think Ghost Recon Arcade Warfighter is realistic, that says enough. I know a bunch of great franchises that got run into the ground by shitty console port attempts, Thief, Deus Ex, Ghost Recon, R6 to just name a few. A console is very limiting on a game, from controls to size to complexity, these all suffer on consoles. Simply because you don't play a console to spend your time sneaking around in the bushes (like After Montignac). You play it for fast Battlefield 2 type action. People don't buy complex games for consoles. It's not possible to have a complex game on consoles, simply because of the shitty controllers. How are you going to aim at little dots 500m away with a controler stick? You won't have to, Flashpoint 2 won't be anything like OFP was. It will be far from realistic. It'll be another action game. Oh it'll be polished and pretty i'm sure and the physics and AI will be great, but fuck if that game will actually be realistic in it's gameplay i'll eat my hat. It'll be GRAW, only maybe with slightly bigger maps and more vehicles.

Where did you read that? Ah man if this is another shitty console game then that hurts... Flashpoint goes the way of ghost recon? Oh no...

Where does it say it's getting released for consoles? I'm not buying no crappy port game. O.o

Well uhh here's my shoddy attempt at translation...

Looks more like artwork to me. O.o Anyways... if they improve the realism then ahwell, i'll buy it. edit: if it turns into Operation Battlefield count me out i already have that.

ACU? Oh! You meant I see you!

This is probably more of a social problem. If the guy at virginia tech was also a nerd who went "Jock Hunting" (queens english: Chav Hunting) then i think maybe jocks should stop picking on the smaller kids, stuffing them in lockers, etc. American kids are usually assholes to eachother*... the constant need of being cool and fitting in... *if you wanna see an example of just how far removed americans are from the rest of the world just look at Iraq, where US soldiers behave all funny like "under stress". (tons of youtube vids better then any insurgent propaganda)