Jump to content

baddo

Member
  • Content Count

    1295
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Medals

Posts posted by baddo


  1. <table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td>Code Sample </td></tr><tr><td id="CODE">

    ejectDamageLimit = 0.750000;

    ejectDeadGunner = false;

    ejectDeadCargo = false;

    ejectDeadDriver = false;

    ejectDeadCommander = false;

    But when i put this in my ArmA vehicle config and set everything to true then after the vehicle was destroyed all units are thrown out of the vehicle and drop to the ground.

    You said you set everything to true. What do you mean with this. What is everything. Let's make the most obvious assumption that you mean you set the ejectDead... variables to true in your config file.

    When the name of the variables are ejectDeadGunner and so on. If you don't want to eject the units, then these variables should be set to false, not to true.

    Just logical thinking, I've not done configs like these and have no idea if this actually helps you. I just saw a logic problem in what you said.


  2. Well it would be amazing if Pentagon would not have had this kind of plans a long time ago already. Knowing how well Iran and USA have gotten along with each other.

    I have to say I am not surprised if a war against Iran is started. But I think nothing good will come out of it, the least for the Americans.

    How much do the people of the USA support these kinds of wars is a good question and would need to be answered by themselfs, soon. I hope they pay attention, its their people, tax money and reputation after all. The Bush Administration most likely hopes the people of the U.S. won't be paying attention.


  3. Oh yes I noticed that change.

    Hypocrisy might be a good word to describe the phenomenom.

    But I think this Musharraf guy is playing with a double-edged sword, on the other side are the people who support Taleban, Osama and others, who knows what else.

    So he must choose his words and actions very carefully, not to push either side over the edge. On one hand he makes it look like he helps USA catch some people which the USA calls "terrorists", but on the other hand the people they are supposed to be catching can cause Musharraf lose his power in Pakistan. So it isn't a wonder to me that Pakistan has done, as I see it, very little to actually help USA to reach its goals.


  4. Well I am willing to try a console version if it hasn't any major drawbacks feature-wise compared to the PC version.

    All the problems with PC hardware and software are driving lots of people in this forum mad, and personally, I've almost had enough of using sophisticated but unreliable and unnecessarily complex to setup technology, such as a PC, for playing games. Becoming a troubleshooter computer mechanic & system administrator is one thing, playing games for entertainment should be another thing.


  5. Are there any updates about Operation Flashpoint: Elite on Xbox 360?

    Has anyone had success in trying to play Operation Flashpoint: Elite on an Xbox 360?

    I had to add Operation Flashpoint: Elite to my collection. As I don't own an Xbox, I am now pondering should I buy Xbox or Xbox 360. I'd rather not buy the old Xbox if I can avoid doing it, but a fact is I should be able to play OFP:E so if it doesn't work on Xbox 360 then I just have to buy the old Xbox.

    What do you knowledgeable people say?


  6. I read from somewhere that spammers use humans too to do the spamming work for them, in addition to using bots. That would mean asking a simple calculus question would not work (if the person got through 1st grade).

    One solution could be to ask questions which only a person who played through Operation Flashpoint: Cold War Crisis could answer!

    "Who is Angelina?"

    Et cetera.

    tounge2.gif


  7. At time of purchase you had information available to you about what features the product contains.

    ArmA has been a slight disappointment for me too, but mainly because I find it not good that a game needs hundreds of megabytes of patching, not because of the features in the game, or because of features not in the game.


  8. I do believe it's a bit too early to jump to the conclusion that ArmA II will lack dynamic destruction of buildings.

    But if it will turn out that way I can only see one reason really; Incompetence.

    Incompetence?

    Hehe, nice one!

    biggrin_o.gif

    How about a decision based on technical facts, instead of incompetence?

    I wouldn't worry too much about dynamic destruction. It either is in the game or it isn't, but no one should go crazy over it. A game is never going to be able to simulate the world exactly how it is... I mean if you are doing dynamic destruction then I demand you start doing Strength of Materials Finite Element Method calculations for all objects in the game, to know how much they deform and what kind of stress is in each point of the objects with given loads and supports. Otherwise how are you going to accurately simulate destruction?

    By the way that kind of calculation is not going to happen in computer games any time soon.

    Just a joke, don't take this FEM talk seriously tounge2.gif


  9. If we do not look back into what happened in the history then we are big fools smile_o.gif

    I definitely hope no new world wars will be started. I wish everyone thinks the same, but unfortunately the big egos of some countries do not allow us to think there would be no new world wars coming.

    I said earlier I am more worried of what the USA does than what Russia does. I see what Russia has been doing recently as a direct consequence of what USA has done. Is it a neverending game, going in circles? Someone with the big egos should step forward and say, this is it, we've had enough of this money-wasting, we are now going to drop doing this and go home once and for all. But I doubt that will ever happen. I can't seriously say that it would be the Americans who would do that, their ego is just too inflated. Russia is on the way inflating their ego again by showing that they have a military too, so no luck with them either... Honestly, I don't want either of them to rule the World. Some kind of balance must exist. So it can even be a good thing if the Russians "show off" a little bit to the Americans, to remind them not to expand too much. Or hell will break loose, I have no doubt that wouldn't happen if USA expands its military to the world too much. So, as I said, it's about what the USA does and that's why I think the US Presidential elections are very important for all of us. Get a President for them who is not so expansionist but concentrates on what happens inside their borders.

    It's about pride. Someone should just swallow it and go home  tounge2.gif


  10. Maybe it is true that U.S. didn't do much. For example, they did not attack Finland, like the U.S.S.R. did in 1939, after faking an artillery strike against themselfs.

    Because the attack was judged as illegal, the Soviet Union was expelled from the League of Nations on December 14.

    thumbs-up.gif

    You can write all day long how the Soviets helped to put a stop to the crazy, insane plans of Hitler. I agree on that, it needed to be done.

    But what gave you the right to attack my land? What gave you the right to annex the Baltic states and thus hinder their development for so many tens of years? Nothing gave you that right.

    So stop pretending that the U.S.S.R. was all good in the WW II, as a lot of people know the opposite is true. In my eyes Stalin is not any better than Hitler.


  11. My old and slow computer running XP didn't seem to lose much in terms of performance when comparing to a friend's faster computer running Vista. I was amazed to notice that he didn't get much better performance even when his hardware was clearly better, I blame it on Vista.

    So there is a performance drop if you use Vista over XP. BUT does it matter if you have as fast a computer as you wrote, a drop in performance maybe with Vista but it could still be acceptable to you.


  12. Or we'll have to wait for OFPEC to catch up with ArmA's scripts...

    Submit scripts for beta testing at the OFPEC beta testing forum boards. Then once your script has been proven to work and you decide it is ready, it will find its way to the Editors Depot.

    That way you will get more ArmA scripts to the Editors Depot at OFPEC.

    Notice that you should check the OFPEC forum if you want to see how many ArmA scripts there are at OFPEC. Just looking at the ED is not enough, as there is a mandatory beta testing phase.


  13. Yep Kooky smile_o.gif

    When Finland was joining the European Union in the 1990's, I thought it was a great idea, I was a youngster at the time, and I still think it was a great idea after thinking about it as an adult for some years. The biggest benefit for Europe from the Union is that The Countries who have been choking each other every now and then throughout history could live together in a more peaceful way, as they would have a clear place, a forum, to meet regularly and discuss about what disturbs them, what is good what is bad, throw words around and not bombs and let the heat out that way.

    In my opinion that alone was a good-enough reason for Finland to also join the EU, to be part of that forum where disputes can be solved without using mass-murder like in WW I & WW II. It's the small countries like this I'm living in, which also get dragged into the mass-murder events even if they have absolutely nothing to do with why the whole event got started. As an example look at WW II, we did not want to fight but we had no choice in practice but to use weapons. So we benefit greatly too if the bigger countries can live in peace with each other.

    A problem I see is that the USA can get too much involved in Europe. I won't thank them if they cause unrest in Europe by expanding their area of influence. It has already happened in some scale, and as far as I can see, the situation is not going to get any better if they keep on doing what they have been doing recently.

    To make myself more clear, I am not that much afraid of what Russia does, I am much more afraid of what the USA does.


  14. Good post Iron+Cross.

    But.

    I agree there is a lot of hypocrisy in the World. But hasn't there always been, and I must say in both sides.

    I at first wrote here some long examples of hypocrisy from both sides, but decided to delete them as it went too much into the direction of an emotional rant. I'll settle for saying that there was lots of hypocrisy from Western countries and USSR/Russia when it comes to what happened in WW II.

    Both sides give a picture of themselfs as being good, but at the same time there are crimes committed by both. I see this has unfortunately not changed since WW II. I guess that's just the way human nature is.


  15. Hehe well I think the next patch for ArmA should really be only fixing bugs and not adding new content or features. It doesn't help if one bug gets fixed but ten gets added.

    Edit: oh well, if something gets added then that would be anti-cheat, -hack and -piracy features.


  16. Are you doing that for AI units or to player units?

    For AI units one solution could be to force them kneel / prone everytime they are not moving for a long enough time and set a global variable to indicate their stance.

    I've used a trigger to make AI units automatically kneel when not moving. I check the speed and if the unit is not wounded too much, and then set the unit to kneel. There is a small delay before kneeling. Into that trigger could as well go a global variable which you would set true/false.

    Of course this could be done in a script too.

    If it's for player units then this won't work.

×