Bordoy

http://forum.johnkerry.com/index.php?showtopic=72443 If chalenged ensure a democrat representative is there. Record the details on paper. Say you want a representative of the democratic party present be polite. Take the details of any witnesses; be polite. Remember be friendly in the queue. Do not get drawn in to big arguments it may be considered electioneering which is not allowed in the queue. If there are Republicans there be friendly be polite if they are electioneering and it bothers you inform a poll worker. Remember you are there to elect the next President of the United states of America. Focus on that job. Stay calm. Stay focused. Stay in the vote. Enjoy your election Remember this is your election Your vote is what counts. It is YOU that is deciding the next president of the United States of America. Get out at 6 0' Clock in the morning on Tuesday. Make a Day of it. Make a carnival of it. Take a picknic or order Piza in the queue but get out and Vote. And Vote John Kerry for President. Kind Regards Walker Why dont you just create a leaflet or flyer, depending on your preference, and send it to everyone in the US?

Hopefuly Well i rightfully predicted that labour would win the last election, Britain would not join the euro when everyone else did, and that UKIP would finish 3rd in the Euro elections. And i predict Bush to win.

Listen to shin, vote Bush. Changing scene of polls You can see towards the end especially in October its been bouncing up and down like crazy. I think there will be one more change to Bush, and for the better

No, its not like we over there, beat all of them up and take there women once a year, is it? lol

No Vote for Bush Even though my comments have not been to good on the european politics thread, europe is not the US, you should vote for Bush as he is the only one to take the US to victory on the war on terror. Kerry has commited war crimes in vietnam, that is why the veterans are against him. How can you, yes you, reward him for such evil activity. He has stood form on the ground that he is against the Human Rights for vietnamese as if it is passed he will be in trouble. George Bush is committed to cut goverment spending and not raise taxes. He wants to help fight the AIDS epidemic in Africa, and he wants to whipe out Prejudice and Hatred. John Kerry will repeal Bush's tax cuts to help the goverment spending, which Bush will cut. Please make the right choice and vote for George W. Bush. This choice affects the world, not just The United States of America.

Did the Mail tell you that? We are having a referendum to decide that, so don't go making sweeping generalisations without any official statistics. I for one, are happy to be both. It's not a case of once we are signed up, we burn all the flags, hang the Queen, and remove Britain from all the history books. Get a grip, and stop being a victim of fear mongering. Ermm no it my experiance as a citizen of the UK and meeting many people. I obviosly dont mean every 65million people, wait i dont have back up for that population, i could be wrong.

No. There's only one Akira! But, frankly, I'll ask you: what major mobile workshops and materials to make WMDs did the US find and confirm that they served for that purpose? Nothing major. I think the mobile workshops were burnt out, and yes i can remember them on tv, not sure about the materials though. Those were not "mobile laboratorys to produce wmds". Thats a fact. Are you really that stupid that you think Iraq had wmds? Even after USAs own investigations have prooved that? Did i say Iraq had them? No. I said they had the mobile labs too, but no materials. I got a a few different types of bullets in my room, but no guns, therefore how can i use them? I hope those are not live rounds, as that would be a tad illegal in the UK. I suggest, that if they are live rounds, you take them to your local police station, and hand them in. I don't know who you got them off, but they should not be in your posession. If they are not live rounds, but empty catridges with the bullet wedged back in, then your analagy doesn't work. Cartridge of the LAW spotting round Blank 5.56mm  (SA-80). 5 linked 7.62mm  (M-60, GPMG). A round (cant remember the size) off an Iraqi T-55 coaxial mounted gun. 2 Grenade Pins Think thats it. But all (part from the blank) have been "de-commisioned", you can tell by the little dint at the bottom of the bullet. The gunpowders been took out. And i have a real smoke grenae lying around in my cupboard.

No. There's only one Akira! But, frankly, I'll ask you: what major mobile workshops and materials to make WMDs did the US find and confirm that they served for that purpose? Nothing major. I think the mobile workshops were burnt out, and yes i can remember them on tv, not sure about the materials though. Those were not "mobile laboratorys to produce wmds". Thats a fact. Are you really that stupid that you think Iraq had wmds? Even after USAs own investigations have prooved that? Did i say Iraq had them? No. I said they had the mobile labs too, but no materials. I got a a few different types of bullets in my room, but no guns, therefore how can i use them? Borrow your neighbor's, on the north side of the street. hmmmm, Saddam could of borrowed the Iranians WMDs

No. There's only one Akira! But, frankly, I'll ask you: what major mobile workshops and materials to make WMDs did the US find and confirm that they served for that purpose? Nothing major. I think the mobile workshops were burnt out, and yes i can remember them on tv, not sure about the materials though. Those were not "mobile laboratorys to produce wmds". Thats a fact. Are you really that stupid that you think Iraq had wmds? Even after USAs own investigations have prooved that? Did i say Iraq had them? No. I said they had the mobile labs too, but no materials. I got a a few different types of bullets in my room, but no guns, therefore how can i use them?

I am not sure about the childish point and ive been here since April 2002, so i know people. But i am now posting more then ever. But yes the proper process should of been followed in this situation. Everyone is a threst these days, N Korea, PR China, Iran.

No. There's only one Akira! But, frankly, I'll ask you: what major mobile workshops and materials to make WMDs did the US find and confirm that they served for that purpose? Nothing major. I think the mobile workshops were burnt out, and yes i can remember them on tv, not sure about the materials though.

"We know we can't count on the French. We know we can't count on the Russians . . . We know that Iraq is a danger to the United States, and we reserve the right to take pre-emptive action whenever we feel it's in our national interest." - John Kerry, CNN Crossfire, 1997 We're in a loop here. Theres another one Akira.

Oh okay.. ! Thats quite an argument! You convinced me! Read the rest of it

Though they did find the mobile workshops and materials to make WMD's

I dont think that it is ignorance. what it is, is that British people like being British (unless they're part of scottish devolution), they don't want to be known as a European. Our Chancellor of the Exchequer Gordon Brown, had five test for the Euro, but Euro didn't pass them so thats why the UK isn't currently part of EuroLand. Gordon Brown also put the UK's economy before his own ambitions to be Prime Minister, as you may or may not be aware.

Oh, im probably thinking about something else. Any other resolutions to do with the situation in Iraq in the year 2003? There was also a resolution about post-war contracts and US involvement in Iraq, again not brought to vote because the Bush Admin was afraid it would reduce their "leadership role" ie whos in charge. Oh right. Seems i was wrong about that resolution so i can only apologise. sorry.

Oh right, thankyou. close this now mods if you want. like you say, Asked and Answered

What happens when they membership of these countries run out on the 31st December 2004? Germany, Chile, Pakistan, Spain, Angola. Do they get replaced by other members of the UN, or re-apply for membership. Also i notice China, France, The Russian Federation, The United Kingdom, and The United States have permanent member staus.

Oh, im probably thinking about something else. Any other resolutions to do with the situation in Iraq in the year 2003?

Which resolution? The French, German, and Russians all said they would veto any resolution that did not allow the inspections to be finished. Bush never gave them anything like that, and constantly demanded that what he wanted went. That's not diplomacy. I remember the result being something like 16-15, but veto's stopped that. Ummm....but the Security Council only has 15 members. 8-7 then. Which equals 15, thats how i got 16-15.

Which resolution? The French, German, and Russians all said they would veto any resolution that did not allow the inspections to be finished. Bush never gave them anything like that, and constantly demanded that what he wanted went. That's not diplomacy. I remember the result being something like 16-15, but veto's stopped that.

I'm sorry. I don't see the concection between this and your orignal assertation that Kerry supported the war and now doesn't? Perhaps you can enlighten me. There isn't a link, but i can see what you mean. So he supported war if they had support from the UN, which they didn't. Didn't more then half of the UN vote for the resolution then the French Germans and Russians used their veto.

http://www.vietnamveteransagainstjohnkerry.com/kerry_human_rights.htm

I'm not sure where you get your information, but Kerry has said the same thing consistently from as far back as 2002 during the debates to give Bush the power to go to war. Do a search for his comments on the Senate floor. In 2002, 2003, and 2004 he has always said his vote was for war as last resort, and stated such numrous times. He stated clearly, on the Senate floor, and in the media, that Bush still had better a)to all he can diplomatically, b)involve our allies (ie Europe), and c) involve the UN. None of which we know Bush did. Bush figures if he keeps repeating that Kerry supported the war and now doesn't, that enough people will believe it. I guess he was right. "Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ...And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real." SEN. JOHN F. KERRY(D, MA),Jan.23. 2003

Somebody said something about contradicting oneself? Well. His first was a statement (We will win..........), his second was an opinion (I think that......). So thats not contradicting. But both of Kerry's were statements so that is contradicting. Ok maybe not the biggest but he still supported it in the first place, and now hes saying he never supported it. WTF.