Benze

I know about most of the conflicts in the world but I have never seen this really explained. What is all the fighting for? EDIT: A chronology would be VERY helpful.

The "Independant" is objective? About as much as...something...that's not objective...

So how does that work? You put it on so people facing your direction would see it as correct, but people facing toward you see it backwards?

Let's say I was to enlist in the USMC. How could or go from an NCO to an O once I was in? Or do you have to start as an officer?

Blah, Tex, that was easy, I got it the second time reading it over.

I think I got a good shot at it. They both have cataracts. When you have cataracts, little halos or circles appear around lights a little bit. So one man shined a tiny little light. This light had a circle around it, so three blinking circles showed the exact location of the man. The Germans either didn't see the tiny light, or couldn't find the source. The man could, because it made a circle around the light.

Errrr...that's quite a simplification. It has a better cannon (actually, now it has one in the first place) can travel at unbelievable speeds in water for an IFV carrying 18 people, and that's another thing, it costs twice as much, but carries three times the people. As for the armor, well, at MINIMUM it can withstand 14.5mm. With extra armor likely added on land missions, well? Who knows.

When I think of nightvision, I think of two types: thermal (lots of colors depending on heat, or just greyscale) and the light enhancing cathoide type, the one that creates a "green" look. Which is better? Which is the one that modern armies use? Which would you rather use in the field? What are the pros and cons for both of these types? I need some clearing up on my nightvision knowledge, any help would be appreciated.

Rehmaf, could you give any links? That would be very helpful. Which lasts longer? Doesn't the thermal imaging one have to be chilled very cold to work? What are the drawbacks of both?

"Remember, when everyone else is shooting, shoot in the same direction."

Yeah, kinda irks me too. If anyone has actually seen a real m16 fire you know right away it fires way faster than that.

I'd piss my pants if officers in the US were not armed, like in some parts of the UK. Fact is, they are different places, folks. America is a violent place.

Yes, that's a keeper. *saves and prints out*

Anytime, anywhere, any reason. <----- angry determination face.

Can someone give me a site comparing the PAGST vest with the new interceptor? I've heard a story about a person grieving in Afghanistan when a motar round landed right next to 4 guys, but they still got up and ran away with only bruises and scratches thanks to the new body armor. Seems like the USMC/Army is getting better equipment everyday. 3 Years from now...

The US could not declare war against NK in the forseeable future.

http://veepersplay.budlight.com/index.a....C339D5A

http://veepersplay.budlight.com/index.a....7A8A06F This thing is fun.

Now i they could afford to buy 2 sets.

What kind of rifle was he using?

Ok, don't bite my head off, but imagine this... Mount a HAWK on an m113 chasis, so you can turn the missles around and stuff. Now, use a command, and put the vehicle halfway in the ground and make it undriveable. So now you'd have just the HAWK turret showing. I know nothing about scripting or modeling, but it sounds very plausible/not that hard. I think there is already a HAWK model out there, shouldn't be too hard. Imagine this thing, it would cover the whole island and all the islands next to it. Â So then you could make a mission where in order for Hind and su25 air support, you'd have to take out the HAWK first.

You can download that video. The chechan militiants are barbaric ****s who in every way fit my definition of "terrorist". Who knows, I maybe would even support Russia if I was pres...

Flying tank it isn't.

F22 can bomb too...

I don't know, could be real, but I could see how it looks fake, the lighting just doesn't seem right...