Jump to content
Bohemia Interactive Forums

TomatoArden

Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    326

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Medals

Posts posted by TomatoArden

  3. Posted

    http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3865048042993700360#

    (9/11 Press For Truth - Victims' Families Tell the Story the Media Won't)

    You obviously did not even bother to review the facts presented.

    The actual opposite of what you claim is the case.

    http://www.journalof911studies.com/ Not a peer reviewed journal, just a piss poor website

    http://www.springerlink.com/content/f67q6272583h86n4/Only one Ive found. The man who co authered this paper "steven E jones' is a nuter who also believes in Weather Machines and that they actually exsist. there goes his credibility.

    LOOK at some of the crazy shit this guys had published http://space.crono911.net/EBook/805_Jones_Jesus.pdf

    the his paper wasnt published in any journals relating to the field or any which are well respected in the scientific community in way that anybody would bother to peer review them

    http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/thermite/explosive_residues.html

    I have reviewed them. The so called 'energetic residues' are iron spheres which have a bunch of possible sources including paint.

    This video was received from NIST under the Freedom of Information Act.

    The term 'explosion' does not mean bomb. 'explosion' noises are head in a Lot of natural disasters where no explosives where involved. Often you hear people describing explosion noises when part of a building collapses with an earthquake or a bit of abridge or something collapses. No evidence of explosives here.In other quotes firemen say they heard the sounds of what they thought where electrical transformers blowing

    great, a bunch of flashy sites which provide little in the way of evidence or facts, just a load of hotch potch speculation. im pretty sure the The American Society of Civil Engineers are more likely to be correct than the AE for truth people.

    http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/sep/27/911-cover-up/

    (At this meeting, Mr. Shaffer says he told the commissioner that Sept. 11 hijacker Mohamed Atta had been identified before the attacks by the Special Operation Command's "Able Danger" program.

    The DIA has long tried to squelch this discussion. On Sept. 21, 2005, Attorney Mark Zaid - representing Mr. Shaffer and others who worked on Able Danger but were ordered not to discuss it - testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee on this and other matters.)

    "NOTHING", yeah right....

    The thing is, for all the questions ask and all the allegations made here, a simple scroogle search will turn up plenty of reading material, but it appears some people actually don't want to know and stick to their opinion without considering the other side of the argument - that is called ignorance.

    Most people have never even heard about building 7 collapsing the same day.

    Though I understand, cognitive dissonance can be a real bummer.

    I could post plenty of more but I'm gone stop now, as some people already pointed out, there is no point arguing over the interweb.

    All I can say is "make up your own minds and don't believe anything without evidence".

    Hmm maybe it did have something related to 9/11 in it, but nevertheless less many media sources have seen the un edited version and found nothing that even suggests the government planned 9/11. i don't see how this book in any way points towards a conspiracy theory

  4. Posted

    ecause the people who claim that it was a government conspiracy are basing their opinion on flawed evidence and are normally deranged, and suggests that their own government and military did it to them, when it is so obvious a load of trollop that it was anything over than a bunch of extremists

  5. Posted

    Well it appears to me there is actually a lot of critical thinking involved if a couple of thousand architects & engineers come forward, not to mention the military & intelligence officers and politicians who have gone on record.

    http://www.ae911truth.org/en/news/41-articles/386-ae911truth-delivers-the-evidence-to-the-media-press-conference-national-press-club-wash-dc.html

    Why did the pentagon buy and destroy those ten thousand copies of operation dark heart recently?

    Able danger has some very unpleasant implications.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Able_Danger

    That architect for truth website is hardly a good resource and lacks any kind of peer reviewed work on the towers, whereas plenty of peer reviewed and backed work has been done on how the plane crashes resulted in all three of the buildings that collapsed to collapse. No published work exsists which hasn't been roundly discredited by the scientific community.

    Why has not a single architect or civil engineering body come forward to say that the towers didnt collapse the way they did? All these top organisations would probably have come out or made some noise if they thought the evidnec pointed towards a demolition by explosives (WHICH IT DOESNT)

    Where are these so called intelligence and millitary people who say it was an inside job, and what is their evidence?:confused:

    That last thing the book has NOTHING to do with 9/11 attacks, it is about the Afghan war and the highly sensitive intelligence operations that took part over 6 year ago, they probably don't want a bunch of possibly compromising information to come out, or any embarrassment over anything which may have happened.

  6. Posted

    Since theres a release, shouldn't this be under complete? I know its a beta, but the complete sections description says any release from alpha onwards should be there.

    I tried this mod, it rocks. The M60 and m48 tanks are bloody awesome models, nad I like the Cobra alot as well, even if it lacks much in the way of armament!

  7. Posted

    Since theres a release, shouldn't this be under complete? I know its a beta, but the complete sections description says any release from alpha onwards should be there.

    I tried this mod, it rocks. The M60 and m48 tanks are bloody awesome models, nad I like the Cobra alot as well, even if it lacks much in the way of armament!

    Edit, wrong thread!

  11. Posted

    I will check on the Sterling... Made this model so long ago I forgot what I was thinking... Initial search confirms your thoughts... but I want to double check to see where I was headed 'back in the day'...

    Which Sten had a fire selector? Not the Mk II... I have one in the family arsenal... automatic or safe...

    Sten MkII (& SD) should be making a showing here in the next release or two... The Belgian army made a Sten called the Imperia (if memory serves) and I believe that had a fire selector on it... but that won't make the MOD... :(

    Actually the MKii sten had a fire selector, and the silenced version was meant to be fired only in semi auto with full auto for emergencies. The silencer being damaged by the use of full auto. I think the same applies to the silenced Sterling. Im pretty sure all stens had fire selectors, it was one of the main advantages it had over the german mp40s, which where stuck in full auto, so you couldn't do carefully aimed shots.

  12. Posted

    Thanks a lot, good to see such a good addon not go to waste.

    However I have some issues, for me the aircraft is just as it was before the conversion, it has no sounds (only weapon sounds) and it still uses the old pilot model from ArmA 1, aka it's not compatible to use as anything other than flying it yourself. I tried both of the downloads you provided (Martin's and Miller's).

    hmm, maybe youve still got the old one installed in your add-ons folder, this has the same file name so check all your addon folders for supliactes. this addon has 5 variants, whears the arma 1 version has only 2. thats because this includes variants that sue some of arma 2s aircraft weapons like a version for AAMs on it.

    @martin, thanks for the AAM version, its great to use, as is the fighter bomber. Are you planning to change the aircraft gun to a proper one for this aircraft? ie one that has a correct rate of fire and sound

  13. Posted

    I'll see you when WW 3 takes off, then. No questions asked, only orders.

    EDIT: Close this thread, forum's full of active or reserve military; wouldn't want anyone with possible PTSD going L.H. Oswald on the old man, if one were to find out that the war he fought was based on fraud & lies, provided, of course, he wasn't duly compensated by the United States of America.

    Mate, the military or ex military on here probably aren't stupid enough to believe 9/11 was an inside job ad and would probably be offended by your stupidity. They might dislike George Bush (this is the old man you refer to?) for being a shit head idiot though.

  15. Posted

    AH-1 is fixed but update wasnt included...

    BAR? that is coming in the next release... call it forshadowing...

    Thompson that is lacking a stock is the Vietnamese (VC) made Thompson. To cut down on the weight of the weapon, they went without a stock.

    ah cool, good to hear these. The Thompson, I understand, they might not bother!

    another thing, the sterling only fires full auto, i thought it had a fire slector. the predecessor sten certainly did anyway

  19. Posted

    Wow, these zeitgeist films are a load of horse shit. the first one was badly made and lacked little real fact or evidence for any of the shit it was peddling. The conspiracy theory crap about 9/11 has been disprove over and over again by respected peer reviewed articles and journals that you wonder why more people still believe 9/11 was some kind of inside job.

    The first film was dishonest in the way that it used news footage from 9/11 and then replaced the audio with dialogue from conspiracy people to make it look like the news people where somehow sceptical at the time of the collapse of wtc of it being anything but what it was.

    also the films lack any proper verifiable references for any of their claims.

×