Jump to content

TomatoArden

Member
  • Content Count

    326
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Medals

Posts posted by TomatoArden


  1. Yep, I tried the same thing, but it is still a fun break from realistic ops in the editor. I just could not stop laughing at the sheer power in that minigun as I laid waste to an assload of AI until one of them was able to hit me in the hit with a well placed 7.62 round:p

    The only problem is trying to fire prone I often end up killing myself as I over compensate for the recoil and shoot just in front of myself.


  2. It is possible to turn RHIB from West to east in the mission pbo after you have finished editing. If you want it to fire at west you have to change the gunners as well. Also if you have opforce AI in the boat when they get out the gunners kill the lot if you dont !

    Maybe one day someone will make a Opforce Gunboat.

    f you group the boat with an opfor unit which is commander set it at higher rank) then the rhib would be an opfor unit. I think so anyway. Or you could place opfor crew in an empty rhib


  3. If somebody could please make an M240L adon..id be most grateful. Seems strange the US Army in takistan would be running around with the older heavier variants..while using SCARS and not have these:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:PEO_M240L_MG_Telescoping_Stock_Right_Side.jpg

    Weight reduced to below that of an M60 and nearly as little as an M60E4. Also it looks sexy. according to the wikipedia article these are being 'type classified' in Q4 of this year, whatever that means!

    Also, it just looks sexy..like the stock! Why cant they put them on the British L7 GPMGs!


  4. What other Mods are you running? There may be a conflict. There's no replies cause nobody can give good advice. This problem you are having is not due to ACE2, it doesn't happen for just about everyone else. Everything you've described should have the keys working. There's gotta be something else you are using that is conflicting.

    Also, although your problem is clear, your not giving a lot of info about the set-up you are using. Are you using other mods? A launcher of some sort? Which ACE2 version are you running? What A2/OA/CO version are you running? Betas?

    One last thing. The devs have stated that if you have any troubles posting here will likely get ignored. It's just too hard for them to follow all the conversations. If you really want help by someone that knows what's going on, post your problem in the bug tracker for ACE2. If you post there, one of the devs will help you.

    my target is as follows

    "D:\Program Files\Bohemia Interactive\ArmA 2\Expansion\beta\arma2oa.exe" -mod=Expansion\beta;Expansion\beta\Expansion;@CBA;@ACE;@ACEX;@ACEX_PLA;@ACEX_SM;@ACEX_USNAVY;@ACEX_RU -nosplash OSs theer shouldnt be any conflicyts. Im running the latest version from Kellys Heroes Arrowhead ACE2 repository. Seems to be something else then. ill try dev heaven if nobody can help here!


  5. My problem is that I cant get the self interaction menu to to come up. Ive edited the Ace client side text file and replaced the Jon doe bit with my user name (below the line it says too). I don't get either the interaction or self interaction menus coming up. My windows key does work (the other binding I had to change to P as I use an apple mac keyboard which doesn't have a menu button), and they are both set up properly as under ACE in the map memu it shows the two functions as binded to those keys.

    Thanks

    I posted this before the recent update and nobody dignified me with a response. Ive still not been able to use any of the ACE features enabled by editing the ace_clientside_config.hpp (the one under arma2/userconfig/ace2) file , Im using the aceclippi tool and ive set the keys to use the right windows key (or cmd on my apple keyboard) and right windows key plus alt in the ACE2 dialogue. Still I get no self interaction or interaction menu what so ever.

    HELP!!


  6. Well, we're replacing the Nimrod R.1 SIGINT aircraft with a version of the RC-135 Rivet Joint made from refurbishing three KC-135R tankers - airframes that are at least 45 years old.

    Rock; in your opinion is the sensor suite on F-35 in any way adequate at performing a maritime patrol/asw role? I've seen a smattering of posts on other forums saying that MRA.4 isn't needed so much, because F-35 could perform such recce roles (with a much shorter range and loitering time) - I wondered if they're talking shite or not.

    base don the fact that the Americans have bothered to develop the P-8 Poseidon to replace the P-3 Orion, then surely the answer is nope.


  7. Yup you are right. I hadn't thought about them. I was more focused on fighters i guess.

    But you could argue that both the Islander and Nimrod predate the Sea Harrier :rolleyes:

    actually they do..even the defender version of the islander does...I only thought of that as it was only recently that the AAC acquired the defender. The Nimrod is based on the De Haviland Comet.. which first flew in 1948. Makes you wonder why the MOD didn't consider replacing it with something more modern instead of that silly re manufacturing project


  8. Just a stupid question: Does the development of the F-35B make any sense at all?

    You may save money by having smaller aircraft carriers, but doesn't the probably increased complexity of the F-35B eat a lot of those savings? Beside reduced mission capabilities?

    What is the tactical use of the F-35B?

    well, the USMC are all for it. They'll be operating it off of their amphibious assault ships, including the future America class. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/America_class_amphibious_assault_ship.

    Other possible users in the future will be Italy and Spain (who operate Harriers atm) and maybe even Australia who could buy a small number for it Amphibious assault ships.

×