Albert Schweitzer

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (RalphWiggum @ Mar. 10 2002,07:12)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (MAsta KFC @ Mar. 10 2002,03:13)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (christophercles @ Mar. 09 2002,16:49)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (MAsta KFC @ Mar. 09 2002,23:44)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Even if you defend someone else from being beaten up, it still comes under self-defence.<span id='postcolor'> Actually in alot of countries this isnt true,i know that in Australia if you defend someone and cause the other person any form of harm, they can bring up charges against you because you wernt just defending yourself. It stupid, and it should be fixed, but thats how it is.<span id='postcolor'> No, I disagree. I live in Australia too, and there have been past cases where one person has defended another and it counted as self-defence. I would quote the case if I remembered it, but I can't be bothered looking up my textbooks atm. As far as Australian law is concerned, defending a less able person is fair and reasonable, as long as the force used is not excessive. If I remember correctly, the case was regarding a couple in a bar, the guy's girlfriend was being assaulted and he jumped in to stop it. Later it was ruled that his actions were counted as self-defence, even though he himself was not threatened physically initially. 'Self-defence' is not strict in its literal meaning and can be extended to others.<span id='postcolor'> the legal term for that is 'third party defense' it applies when the victim was unable to defend him/herself, and had to 'defended' by third person. it's usually, not a law, but a statue.<span id='postcolor'> Oh if this realy has been the case in your country and he has been found "not guilty" then it is "case law" so you wouldnt need a "statue" for that. BTW hey Mr Fubar do you know where this word fubar comes from?

Ehmm, what about the passengers of the plane? I must admit that it realy appears a little bit strange that a plane his the Pentagon, but still I dont believe in a political lie. I would not discuss in terms of physics cause this is a field which you can hardly oversee. An argument may sound logical but in reality it isnt. But strange is the fact that "the plane hit the building vertically. To fly the appropriate curve and dive deep down into Washington, stay at an altitude similar to that of the traffic lights, you must be (as I think) terribly well trained. Minutes before you must keep the plane precisely in the right tunnel, a Boeing does not allow great corrections. Another question I ask myself is: why didnt the plane dive through the whole building?". Okay, some of you say the pentagon is build very bomb sequre, whatever. But what you think a WTT is constructed like? I am sure a plane of that size (if diving in vertically) would have cut the pentagon into seperate buildings! But who knows? Â

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Wobble @ Mar. 09 2002,22:50)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">No it doesnt sound violent! It sounds ridiculous! well it would take a truily ridiculous situation to make me do that.. is not like I stick it out the window "THATS MY PARKING SPOT BITCH!"<span id='postcolor'> LOL, (well I would love to do that at least once)

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Wobble @ Mar. 09 2002,09:40)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">I know that sounds "violent" or "bad" but few things will bring a confrontation to a quick and relativley quite end than sticking a gun in someone's face.. though I havent had to do that.. yet. Â <span id='postcolor'> No it doesnt sound violent! It sounds ridiculous! Â I think pulling a gun just to get rid of someone is ...slightly too much!

I know a girl that kicked the crap out of a guy that attacked her boyfriend, Not that she is tall or strong or highly emancipated but she got so angry that she spilled her longdrink over the guys face and started hitting him. Not that he realy got hurt but everyone was laughing.

I got 34 points, but I think everyone gets something like 30-40!

Yes, Amen! Father Satchel!

Wobble seems to be the only Graf Dracula with a internet-connection!

? ? Always when I hear something like this I want to see a picture of the "murder"! Anyway, I guess half of the story comes from Hollywood the other one from Kentucky-News-Channel

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (RalphWiggum @ Mar. 08 2002,16:37)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (LordZach @ Mar. 08 2002,16:29)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">what else you gonna do when you run out of ammo? Â use harsh language?<span id='postcolor'> how about urinating? <span id='postcolor'> You may laugh but I saw it on TV yesterday. There was a monkey trying to escape from a lion. So the monkey climbed up a tree but the lion did not give up and waited. The monkey threw leaves and pieces of wood after the lion but he did not give up. So the monkey ....well the rest of the story we know!

You people havent lived in an Irish Boarding school yet. They welcomed me there with a good wrestling "slam on the floor from 2 m altitude" (and that was meant to be fun). So I started my first week in Ireland with breathing problems. And then I had to learn Rugby (damm I am German)! I think with this one person you didnt risk much! I must admit that you are a very decent person cause others would have had no remources to knock that person down (in a gentleman way). I am disgusted by people saying things like: "you should leave, I wanna have fun with the two girls!", I hate it, hate it, realy hate it..! There are countries such as spain where you must be very very careful about what you say about girls. In Germany people that want to have a fight know that they can only get what they want if they touch your girlfriend or dont stop offending her. "Well, hmmm what should I do? Let him touch my (female) friends, basically be a coward, or tell him to stop and get a punch for free? Anyway, the evening would be screwed! My solution is: I just dont go to those kind of clubs anymore. I rather pay a little bit more, but  then at least the club is smaller, the girls prettier and the Wishkey-Coke has higher percentage of alcohol. (BTW: I agree what Nordic DK sais. 100% right, forget about those strategies, they make you think you are strong but you are not, and usually such a fight is over before you remembered any of those tactics. Usually (for us non-hooligans) a fight is a ridiculous thing, cause it looks stupid and not at all like Bruce Lee. But never be afraid tooooo much, cause if something happens and you realy realy loose, because you were too afraid, then you will suffer minority-complexes for the next 3 years)

I wonder if the astronauts up in the Hubble can watch the fights in Afghanistan like we play Civilisation 3? And they make bets....in which cave the US-soldiers find Taliban and in which they wont!

Oh, I think every second journey of Blair goes to the States, doesnt it. First of all because people like to cheer so much over there and secondly because he has to find a reason to escape from internal conflicts (such a the mayor talks with the UK-unions)

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Ex-RoNiN @ Mar. 08 2002,11:04)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Albert Schweizer @ Mar. 07 2002,16:31)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (theavonlady @ Mar. 07 2002,15:36)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Albert Schweizer @ Mar. 07 2002,15:31)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">"profiting from the dead" or something like that it was called in a magazine (written by a lady with jewish roots).<span id='postcolor'> Are you referring to my FAQ? Â <span id='postcolor'> No I am refering to a German magazine called "Focus". This is where I found the link and a short comment on it<span id='postcolor'> Focus isn't exactly a reliable news source...I'd go with Spiegel any day.<span id='postcolor'> True, but what else do get to read in a Barber shop?

You are probably right. There is something wrong with the ears. But the best paintings in the world were corrected a few times. So nothing to be anoyed about

Whether or not that is not the issue here. I am just terribly anoyed that a group of Kentucky-farmers interprets such a dark piece of history with their A+B=C logic. Oh of course I forgot, just because they got Israeli roots they understand history better then people that lived and suffered here. I mean how twisted must one be to assume that a German-Jew would have ever thought about the German Weapon laws as a reason for their indefensiveness. But for you non-brainers over there (I mean the writers of the Site) why your logic wouldnt work: Those Jews back in the Hitler-era considered themselves (as I do) as 100% Germans. Which they were since their families arrived centuries before in the middle age. Being German at those times meant also a certain prussian discipline towards State and government. Noone would have ever dared to aim at a policeman (especially if there is a whole truck coming to get you) Reason 2. Germany was a highly developed and intellectual country, noone in the beginning(also the jewish-germans) could believe that something like this would ever happen in the country of Goethe and Schiller. The genocide started when the jewish part of the population was already fully demoralised (but of course you Rambos would have killed them all like in Wolfenstein part 1). It wasnt that that they came and said: pack your things we are going to kill you and your family. No, they were moved first and gathered in Gethos. Their things were taken away...and a long period of demoralisation started. 3. Dont forget that Germany was playing the mayor role in a world-war, this confusion amongst the population gave Hitler basically free hand to do whatever he wanted with the Jewish-Germans I am sick of reading what I write since it is such an infantile simplification but still it is worth more than their marketing text to safe the "county weapon laws" for some shepherds.

I can assume that I am gonna get stoned for this, and I am sure there were tons of threads about it without me having noticed it. But for the neirds like me (if there are any), have you noticed this project from Bohemia: Independence Lost I am not too sure if they want it to be OFP2, but I am sure that they have noticed where their strengths are so they try to build on it (plus a great reputation). What do you think?

Wow, thank you very much! You must understand, I was just curious!

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (theavonlady @ Mar. 07 2002,15:36)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Albert Schweizer @ Mar. 07 2002,15:31)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">"profiting from the dead" or something like that it was called in a magazine (written by a lady with jewish roots).<span id='postcolor'> Are you referring to my FAQ? Â <span id='postcolor'> No I am refering to a German magazine called "Focus". This is where I found the link and a short comment on it

I can assume that I am gonna get stoned for this, and I am sure there were tons of threads about it without me having noticed it. But for the neirds like me (if there are any), have you noticed this project from Bohemia: Independence Lost I am not too sure if they want it to be OFP2, but I am sure that they have noticed where their strengths are so they try to build on it (plus a great reputation). What do you think?

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Damage Inc @ Mar. 07 2002,15:23)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Old stuff, very old stuff.<span id='postcolor'> Yeah, but you know I am kind of conservative, stick to the old, reject the new! Since when is it up? How many years did they keep me in the freezer with Michael?

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Damage Inc @ Mar. 07 2002,15:23)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Old stuff, very old stuff.<span id='postcolor'> Yeah, but you know I am kind of conservative, stick to the old, reject the new! Since when is it up? How many years did they keep me in the freezer with Michael?

Gun control = genocide ahh, there is much worse. There is one site that sais that: if there wouldnt have been any gun-restrictions in Germany back in 1944 the Jewish-Germans could have defended themselves. Find the silly Site here (wobble has little image in his sig that reminds me of that thesis) Me personally, I got nothing to do with it. But I think they abuse history as a marketing tool for there own purposes. Basically they abuse their own dead to support a silly thesis. "profiting from the dead" or something like that it was called in a magazine (written by a lady with jewish roots). Maybe you should change this thread to: Sites that make me furious.

Nice signature you got there Black Op. Is it some kind of provocation. Tell me if it is!

" see, even if I add the second ingredient nothing happens, it doesnt even change color! But see this, now if I add the third liquid we get what I call the mortal-expl....!" "Dont be afraid, I know this guy, he is just one of those young freaks from the gothic-club downtown. "for allaaaahhhh"