Albert Schweitzer

Actually, if I would be a terorist I would bake the powder into bread

Tomorrow I will put powder sugar into little tiny bags and glue them to my jacket. Then I am gonna rob a bank and threaten with my antrax-vest. I am sure it is gonna work. And then when I leave in my car I will throw these bags out of the window, they will hit the road and break and white powder will come out. The police wont dare to come near those white stains on the road and stop chasing me.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Jester983 @ Sep. 11 2002,02:13)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">LOL just proves how dumb most criminals are. Â <span id='postcolor'> Hey, are you making fun of my father's business?

I wonder what this ambassador is gonna do now without his daily portion of cocaine? At least they thought it is antrax!

That is a fake. I tried it with all possible soutions and it didnt work, the plane slippes away beneath you. Maybe he modified the plane and put the pilot-seat on top of the cessna, who knows. But did you ever see how funny it looks if you blow up the plane and fry the pilots!

I would love to work on new stunts right now but I am waiting till I get my new CPU. I need a better performance otherwise it lacks some fun. Right now I am experimenting a bit with the air-baloons. They are fun too!

I hope Ran never gets children, just imagine this forum full of Rans and Junior-Rans and Junior-Junior Rans. Damn that must be like playing Lemings

reminds me of cars like these! I mean it is a pure HK with something badly built on top of it (you can see the two things not realy fitting together).They should rather try to implement those huge things on top of the HK into the backpack and connect it with a visual aid in the helmet. Or whatever solution there may be, but that thing can only be used as a cudgel Â

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Sadico @ Sep. 10 2002,15:17)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Der Spiegel<span id='postcolor'> Hey Albert, my parents read that magazine! Â I've seen it a lot of times at home <span id='postcolor'> You got smart parents ! It is very socialist though, so I alway skip the "national politics" chapter!

You mean you gonna smoke him out of his caves?

This guy on the photo to the left of the article (the one holding up a folder) has a funny way of talking. I dont know how you call it but he cant speak the "s". So whenever he repeats "weaponth ot math dethruthion" I gotta smile even though the issue is serious.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Tex [uSMC] @ Sep. 10 2002,00:07)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (supah @ Sep. 09 2002,22:45)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Tex [uSMC]: The owner of that site knows that fullwell, but the looks of it a US attack on iraq is unavoidable due George W bush his hawkish attitude (it isnt even an election year, odd). Note that this poll hasnt and wont be tampered with. This is just to see what people think about a possible strike against iraq. If it was something else why put the possibility to agree with a strike? <span id='postcolor'> My mistake. How stupid of me to think that, when his URL is STOPTHEWARONIRAQ, not PREVENTANYPOSSIBLEFUTUREWARONIRAQ. Stupid, stupid, STUPID of me! God!<span id='postcolor'> There is also a Site called endthewar.org (bout Iraq)

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Cloney @ Sep. 10 2002,00:41)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Albert Schweizer @ Sep. 09 2002,20:24)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Yeah, it is gonna be cool. We gonna get new films and stuff. Maybe even a new version of Americas Army where you got to bomb roads and cities and stuff. Fucking hell and we gonna see all those new US weapons and maybe even pictures of american soldiers in an mustard-gas attack. Like in "Total Recall" they will try to get air and their eyes will pop out and then they all explode and spit blood and stuff. So fucking cool. And maybe we can all join like in Starship Troopers. I was pretty good at playing Americas Army, I think they would make a sniper immediately with the score I reached in that game. And once Saddam is pissed of he will throw nukes at Isreal and they will throw theirs back and then we gonna see from satelites how the entire Middle East is like gleaming at night and stuff. So fucking awesome<span id='postcolor'> Totally Uncalled for Albert especially when our soldiers could be killed in the fighting. I know you think its funny, but we certainly do not when our soldiers come home in little green plastic bags. <span id='postcolor'> Dont get me wrong. My intention is anything but to make fun of dead people. But I assume that sarcasm is best the way right now to describe the general motion of people waiting for the US to bash Iraq. But many/most of those people dont care about the initial intention, nor the political reasoning, nor the outcome. They just want to see action and many have forgotten how bloddy a war can be. We were lucky that OUR troops didnt suffer much during the last interventions, but we all know that war can turn into a total desaster (if it isnt already). I am still convinced that my "Starship Troopers Generation" comment adequate portrayed it! And it had nothing to do with US bashing

I take the "Tropical summer promotion" which includes two tanks at own choice, with desert cammo, 45 Heat rounds for free, and 4500 litre of cerosine free of charge. I didnt know that Band of Brothers actually owns the originals to their Models in OFP. Now they are selling them http://www.tanksforsale.co.uk/ot810leyland/ot810leyland.htm

Just wait till Longinius and Denoir post their references: Smřrebrřt daily Svenska&Dansk News Viking World The Mirror (Likt skrivsätt, likt uttalande ) News for the vinter-folk (Olikt skrivsätt, likt uttalande) Daily MS fönster news

Der Spiegel Neue Zuericher Frankfurter Allgemeine Welt am Sonntag I am sure most of you know the one above The Economist and a lot of garbage news!

I think I got the demo on a CD from my Comp-mag. To me it looks like a shitty addon of SOF2. BTW: I am planing to upgrade my computer from P4 1.3 Ati Radeon VIVo 64MB to P4 2.4 Asus 8420 Deluxe 128MB What you think? and what should I change first: processor of graphic card?

Now guess what! Where is the coach from? GERMANY! And yesterday also Scottland played against Feroer Islands and only reached a terrible 2-2 Guess too where the coach was from? GERMANY! Now I know how we make the german soccer improve, we just fuck up everyone else's

Yeah, it is gonna be cool. We gonna get new films and stuff. Maybe even a new version of Americas Army where you got to bomb roads and cities and stuff. Fucking hell and we gonna see all those new US weapons and maybe even pictures of american soldiers in an mustard-gas attack. Like in "Total Recall" they will try to get air and their eyes will pop out and then they all explode and spit blood and stuff. So fucking cool. And maybe we can all join like in Starship Troopers. I was pretty good at playing Americas Army, I think they would make a sniper immediately with the score I reached in that game. And once Saddam is pissed of he will throw nukes at Isreal and they will throw theirs back and then we gonna see from satelites how the entire Middle East is like gleaming at night and stuff. So fucking awesome

I am out for lunch, please leave your posts on the responder, I will get back to you!

The more I read about the US-army having started long ago to prepare for this war and construct new bases in the middle East the more I feel that whatever the UN may decide the US will not change its plans. During the last days I have asked myself a lot of times when Saddam last mentioned that he will attack the US once his army is remobilised. I dont really remember any such statement. I feel that since 9/11 and the intensification of the MiddleEast crisis war has become a legitimate tool of politics. People still talk about war against terorism when discussing the Iraq issue. Which is of course pure bullshit. Any proof of Saddam harbouring terorists? We should translate this political decision to attack Iraq into an example of everday trial, cause to me it gets kind of confusing: what about this one: "a guy who once robbed his neighbour got caught by the police. The police said that he has allow them search his house for guns every once a week. One day this guy refuses to open the door, also because the police has closed his bank account for years. Now a single police officer who once was shot and no longer trusts any former criminal visits this dude without his chief knowing about it. He pulls he former criminal out of his house and beats the shit out of him because he assumes that a.) not letting the police enter the house means he bought a new gun. and b.) as a consequence of a. having a new gun means that the dude wants to shoot a police-officer. As reasonable as this may sound to some of you. To me this sounds like a ridiculous preventive trial! Putting someone ino jail before he can commit a crime.

You can be indignant about posts here as much as you want. But in order to proof someone wrong you cannot simply refer to old tales such as: "one day the wolf will be knocking on YOUR door!" Please dont forget: If the US (or the UN) attacks Iraq then we are the AGRESSORS and not Saddam. We will start a war simply because we consider someone to be a threat of the future. Why dont we attack China next. I am sure they are aiming their nuclear missiles at the pentagon too? You never know, prevention is better than reaction, isnt it? "we are the ones in power not the Saddams of the world" Welcome to the "axis of evil" paradise. You are a new member of the see-everything-in-black-and-white-federation!

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (denoir @ Sep. 08 2002,15:16)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">0--></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Albert Schweizer @ Sep. 08 2002,150)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">But wait! One thing we shouldnt forget is that those uncontrollable states try to get atomic-weapons. What do we do if one day Iraq actually has them functioning. What do you do then? Any army approaching Hussein would be blown to dust. You got to think forward. Either now or never.<span id='postcolor'> Was this irony? If yes, never mind the rest of my post. As long as he is kept under UN observation there is no problem. Even if he got nukes we would have more. The possibility of some action in the future hardly justifies a military operation that will kill at leat thousands of civilians.<span id='postcolor'> Yes, this was irony.

But wait! One thing we shouldnt forget is that those uncontrollable states try to get atomic-weapons. What do we do if one day Iraq actually has them functioning. What do you do then? Any army approaching Hussein would be blown to dust. You got to think forward. Either now or never. But of course we have to try out any option before the military one.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Hovmand @ Sep. 07 2002,01:34)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">2 people have voted sex  <span id='postcolor'> Damn, one of them was me! But I misinterpreted the question. I thought: "what would you never dare to give up" So the whole poll is null and void and must be closed imediately and all participants banned till the year 2012.