Adammo

Any chance of someone posting links to these ballisict choppers.. I'm curious what they look like?

yes i do have screen shots.. but i was wondering the interest before i posted them.. I personally love the uh1 choppers..thats probably what drive me to make my own workable ones.. I used some cockpit features from the spec ops chopper with permission.. they did such an awesome job on it.. why recreate it all over again.. so i saved a little time there..

Hello guys... I just found this topic.. Okay here is the problem.. when someone updated a mod.. and republishes it.. and they play someone in Multiplay that was the old MOD.. with the same name.. then cheating happens if it is meant or not.. and Sync issues start happening.. I have new internal textures sounds and the like to update the choppers.(which I will call a new name) these choppers will be what everyone whats.. BUT I was thinking.. i could spend a bunch of time reworking this chopper OR.. i can make a new one.. so i spent the time making a new chopper.. its not an AH or Oh type chopper.. its completely new.. and is now finished.... two new choppers.. I had help with them also.. they looks SWEET there is no other word for it.. I will publish when they are rdy.. stay tuned.. to this forum.. when they are out.. you will want to get them..guarenteed.. Capt Moore www.101st.org

I ge the error 4 times... and Nothing is copied.. I'm unable to get the tool to work.. any ideas? Capt Moore

I ge the error 4 times... and Nothing is copied.. I'm unable to get the tool to work.. any ideas? Capt Moore

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Is the hardware T&L problem with ATI Radeon cards fixed with the new patch?<span id='postcolor'> Try this.. it has fixed tons on my new Radeon 9700 Pro card http://www.ati.com/support/infobase/4081.html Its a driver that is not their standard driver.. and is hard to find. But here is the link. It solved tons of issues I was having with it.

-Improved: Editor: Vehicle classes (Armored, Car, ...) are now fully dynamic. Any addon maker can now introduce his own classes. Does this mean we can mix classes to make our own? example mix the plane and boat classes to make a float plane? or a car and armour to make a TOW hmv? Thanks, Capt Moore

Does anyone have a list of bug fixes coming out in the new patch? or maybe features?

I'll have to recheck my license agreement to use Oxygen but I thought it said something about it was not legal to sell or gain money from addons made from it without written consent from Bi Studios. btw, any addons that I make and people want to make profits from will be screened thru Bi Studios before I give any permission.. I would not like to get into a legal proceeding over a few models that I put out for free for the fun of it. I suggest sending a letter to Bi studios before you go any further and just ask them. Getting sued from BI Studios AND Codemasters it not my cup of fun.. Capt Moore

yes pbo name also yes the name located in the config.cpp Please change both names to your own suiting.. and not use the original names. Thanks, Capt Moore

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">I am currently about halfway done a USAF C-130. It is the standard gray scheme (I realize it sounds boring, but it actually looks good ). I will probably do the green camo version next. Adammo, do I have permission to release this on completion? Do I just need to credit you in the readme? <span id='postcolor'> You have my permission i fyou change the name of the file from c130v1a.pbo to what ever ou want to call it.. I would prefer that you addon didnt overwrite mine on people's machines.. diff addons named the same thing can cause all kinda of havoc. Please rename the "file name" and also the "title" of the c130 so that they can co-exist without conflict. Thanks, Capt Moore

Does anyone know how to make the radius turns smaller on a larger model? As you know the c130 has a hard time turning (taxi) and I do not know how to fix this. Any ideas?

wow that thing is huge! would be GREAT for flyovers! can have a script that creates it.. then it flys overs.. then remove it from teh game.. and in a random time do the sam thing.. then it might look like a busy airport..

It can not be done.. I tried! I even called Microsoft to see if they would release a tool to convert user made aircraft to 3ds.. and they won't. The mdl is Microsofts MDL and not the DOOMS MDL.. completly diff format.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Quote (Gunship [OFP-ZONE] @ Sep. 10 2002,22:16) New C-130 Update! You can download Adammos latest version of the C-10 on http://www.ofp-zone.de Remember version on ofp.info or so on are old version this is the new on its only 15 minutes old ;o) 800 kb image Isn't that the same version 1a that has the sound bug? Â <span id='postcolor'> yes the same model name but the one located on their site has been updated. Â I didnt want to create a new model just to fix the sound bug. Â check the README file.. at the top it will have new info if the model has the sound bug fixed. it will say the following: </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"> 9/10/02 MAJOR LOD improvements... I think you will be much happer with this one..all LODS are now textured and looks good even up to 5000 view <span id='postcolor'> Also the LODS are fixed so that it looks MUCH better from a distance!

ok guys and gals I was just made aware of a sound bug in my latest release of the C130v1a The sound file from the new one points to the WAV file in the older c130. So if you have both installed this is not an issue. but if you just have the newest version installed your sound will not work. so.. I sent a new copy to ofp.gamezone.cz and ofp-zone.de with the sound file fixed in it.. It will be the same file except the sound is fixed.. (when they get it up) but for now.. if you have the green c130 the sound will work fine. Capt Moore

I did see it about the AC130.. and no plans. I mentioned this in a post a while back on this thread, and kinda explained why.. but no plans based on the OFP engine limitations. -Capt Moore

http://www.ofp-zone.de http://www.ofp-zone.de http://www.ofp-zone.de http://www.ofp-zone.de http://www.ofp-zone.de http://www.ofp-zone.de http://www.ofp-zone.de http://www.ofp-zone.de click on one of the above links to access the new c130

If a version was made for 1.46 it would be bugged version. how? because the HWT&L selection in the options will NOT work properly because it REQUIRES cfgmodels subroutine. yes if you set it to Software in the options it will work.. if modified but the point it.. the addon would still be bugged. Capt Moore

it is my c130.. he was generous to host the download for me. so for clarification.. the blue looking c130 Â c130v1a.pbo is mine and is official for me Capt Moore new credits have been added in the read me

The new c130 is completed with enhanded cockpit.. 3rd pilot seat and 4th nav station in the cockpit area. more round landing gear. Also the new textures and I enlarged the c130 is mil spec size. one waring!!! don't try taxiing it .. because you probably can't because of its size.. it works on the larger airports with no trees and buildings but you will see.. Capt Moore

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">I know that, but you don't need to use the cfgmodels routine because your c-130 has no weapons and hence no muzzle flashes that could give problems. Making a 1.46 version took me less than a minute (just change the version number and delete the cfgmodels part) and it works perfectly, so why don't you release it for 1.46? There are lot's of people without resistance who would like to use your plane. <span id='postcolor'> Apparently you dont under stand what the cfgmodels subroutine does. Â It allows textures to change, example muzzle flash is just a texture change. Â Also the props on an aircraft when spinning up and changing to BLUR is also a texture change.. the cfgmodels is needed for this texture change to work properly. Â People just refer to the issue as a muzzle flash.. but it really has nothing to do with muzzle flash that just how it was identified first .. and yes the c130 has texture change from spinning props to blur props.. so it would effect it and it does need it. Â btw if you make the change to 1.46 I won't support it and fix it.. so you guys are on your own. its worth the money to buy resistance. I know some people didnt upgrade because they had pirate copies .. that that is their problem. But for you legit users I suggest upgrading.. the netcode is WAY worth it.. Capt Moore

wow i really like the reskin too.. if you want. send me the reskin.. I can take it and make a c130v1a.pbo file.. so that either or both can be used in the same mission. Capt Moore

if an AC130 was ever make it would only have 1 gun on it. because of the limitations of the current engine.. so whats the point? also I was unable to get the "gunner position" to work.. so there is a possibility that there is no GUNNER for fixed wing aircraft... Because of these factors I think it would make an AC130 very hard to fly and shoot and hit anything. (all with one gun hanging out the side)

Oxygen doesnt have a scale to measure the actual feet of a model like 3dsmax does. So its a best effort guess. Based on the hundreds of C130 pics that I have, the scale looked good to me. Also I used 6 beta testers and this was never an issue. Â Another issue is the bigger I make it the less likely you will never be able to turn it. Â the turing radius is already BAD. Â but the AI can manage to turn it and get it on the taxi ways after a landing. Â I even have to do a little cheating on the model just so that it won't get snagged on trees that are WAY to close to the taxi lanes.. Â in a real airport I think that the trees next to the taxi ways would have been clrd. especially for the bigger planes. Anyway.. if the plane was any bigger then it is now you wouldn't be able to taxi it at all and it would never make it down some of the taxi ways. Capt Moore