Undeceived

Your post reminds me a little bit of this (linky) - sorry... But seriously, I think that it's obvious that by saying that I expect a bug free campaign or game I'm not moaning. I'd say there is a tiny difference, no? I just want what you also said. I want them to make the game. And as good as possible. The details (which is where some people get cocky) are not of highest priority, I have trust in BI that they will do it right. :D You won't believe it but I really thought, as I was writing: "You fool, why are you throwing away so much time!!" :D Love... :eek: Now imagine if you show your love to your gf with such an attitude as some show here!! Poor girl... EDIT: Another one... Please read what I wrote to Mosh. :)

I knew something like that would come! :D I hope it was a joke? :o

Yes - I think that these are some of the most important questions!

I like the logo - as it is. But I wonder what else small details people will find to complain... PS: And thanks for the highres logos!

Ah nice. This one hasn't the big res as the others, but thanks!

Are you guys talking about this one here? :D It really is annoying! :D

Thanks for your post, Keine. I really hope that the whining will stop soon! :D I hope not! :) I liked his voice in Arma 2 but I'll always remember the A2 (and A1: Queen's Gambit) characters when I hear it. We need a new voice for the new face!

Yes That guy, I agree with you, normally Ragdoll looks way too overdone and extreme. But maybe it is possible to tune the body movements down so that it looks a bit more realistic. But nevertheless - it's not confirmed yet anyway...

Yes, same here. But I have a question: Ragdoll is a part of the PhysX engine, right?

And what makes you think that "we all" agree with you nitpicker? I agree a little bit with you, Fuzzy. In A2 the performance was rather low, but in OA it became a lot better (Chernarus too). Nevertheless sometimes I also wonder why the frames are so low for me... The strange thing sometimes is that is makes no difference if you have 1000 meters view distance or 5000! :D I really hope that BI will continue optimizing the performance - Arma 2 definitely was a step in the right direction though (compared to Arma 1 ;) ).

FN SCARs were cancelled too (for the US army), but they are in OA. And where is the problem?!

Yes, definitely real life...

Thanks A LOT, BI!! Congrats!

I still don't understand - what is so unrealistic in the game for you?

Bye then. :bye:

Ok, but the SCAR rifles in OA were also not actual (I mean: The US army did not take them). But it was absolutely ok, in my opinion!

No, still forbidden to access for me.

But is it really soo futureweaponish? If I understood it correctly all gear is realistic / present today?!

Now where is the guy who said that this would be so unrealistic that it isn't Arma anymore? :)

EXACTLY!! :D Dammit, just look at these screenshots... :yay: WOW!!

https://www.facebook.com/arma3official is up.

Congratulations! ;) :p

www.bistudio.com Database Error: Unable to connect to the database:Could not connect to MySQL :D

bistudio.com seems to have crashed! :D :D

What is their twitter page link again?