spetznaz14

It actually looks marginally worse in the "after" shot.

Still looks "hazey" to me, man I'm sick of this s**t from nvidia.

No difference here, arma still pages to the hdd even with pagefile disabled.

101.2 by far. my system = E6600, P5B, 2gb, 8800gts

I'm finding it all a bit hazey to understand.

Actually I had 9800pro, X850pro then X1900XT with no problems before I stupidly got this 8800gts.. Anyway these official drivers officially suck: 101.2 beta = 4120 armamark 97.94 = 3482 Also had weird LOD issues in the official ones..

Well this driver is dated from febuary so it's probably older than the beta drivers, well done nvidia you screwed up again. One things for sure - my next GPU is ATI.

http://lee.plankton.ch/ArmA_105b_GF66_88.jpg ?

Still quite foggy on 8800, not sure its an Arma issue though, when are the idiots over at Nvidia going to finally release a new xp driver?!, if their next set dont fix the fog I am going to be seriously p**sed off with them. http://homepages.nildram.co.uk/~spetzn....-03.jpg http://homepages.nildram.co.uk/~spetzn....-12.jpg Better than before but not cured.

swedes cant make planes grippen would get shot down by camel. But F15 and Mig29 would be nice..

BIS have fixed the problem in the next patch which is good of course, the bad news is a that might be a month away, so another month without arma..

They dont fix the 8800 fog issue if anyone was wondering.

I would get a cheaper cpu such as E6600 as you can overclock them (mine runs 3.2ghz fine) then save the money so you can get another 8800 in sli or a r600 gfx card in the future.

How did you get hold of that beta?, you can always upload it.

When can we expect this fix?!, I mean its a pretty major thing, I dont want to wait for silly little bug fixes if it delays this...

It is probably ok for the AV-8 though as it uses Short take off and landing?, so makes sense that north is BLUE and south is RED. I would really like some snowy mountain peakes then we could have a ski/sledge invasion lol.

Well for the people like me that it runs like a "honda" for then of course they are not going to be happy with it, maybe some of the fanboys need to understand that just because it runs nice on their system it does not mean it runs that well on all systems...

I'm going to go against the grain here and say it depends on your system, if like me you have a C2D and 8800 I would hold off for a bit and see if the next patch fixes some serious performance issues (and that damn fog), its just too annoying to be playable as it is.

Join the club, this game has great potential if they ever get it right but I really cant be bothered until they do. I should not have stick most stuff on low on an E6600 3.2ghz and 8800 ffs.

Yes, I could play Arma ok on the same processor and an x1900xt @ 1024x768 normal detail.

Uh its not only in Vista...

You need a new graphics card, simple as that really.

I got a response (from metaboli) basically asking the same - why do I need another serial code?, so I told them straight - because the software is buggy and its not my PC!!. I dont think we should take any cr*p from these amateurs.

lol suggest that you get your PC in working order that is funniest thing I've ever heard, so utterly pathetic, you should reply back saying I suggest you get your re-activation system and tell BIS to get their game in working order!!!. If they dare say that to me I would demand my money back.

Impressions = Good - no more CTD so far... Bad - awful performance, hd paging and jerkiness unplayable I am very close to giving up on this game now and I was a huge fan of OFP.