.kju 3245 Posted July 16, 2008 Would please mission makers share their opinion on that one please. Thank you! --- The OAC project is meant to make OFP missions and campaigns playable in ArmA. At times the missions need slight changes as some aspects are different between OFP and ArmA technically (script syntax changes). Now is OK to update the mission without seeking the authors approval, while keeping every other aspect intact (like readme, stating the original author and credits) and stating very clearly that the mission was only updated to work in ArmA by project OAC? Thank you for your consideration. --- My personal thoughts: The need to request permission for every mission or to wait for x weeks or months will effectively make the project non functional and would kill it. IMHO the original author's main interest was to share his work and let others enjoy it. So as long as the true ownership and the role of project OAC is stated I would say no permission is needed and most authors should welcome to see their work also playable in Armed Assault. The exception is of course if the author explicitly stated that he wants no modification of his work what so ever. Not to sure on this one too though. .kju PS: More details on project OAC BIKI BI forum thread Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Balschoiw 0 Posted July 16, 2008 My opinion: - try to get in contact with original author - if you get no feedback after predefined interval give respective credits in readme and missiontitle and do not replace any custom mission authors ressources within the mission that point to the original creator. If you do all that I can´t see what should be going wrong if the original author has left the community or is not available for some other reason. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites