PriMo_ 0 Posted December 25, 2005 Hi! Well lets keep it simple, I believe my computer got very slow sence I installed another extra 512MB Ram. So well, I tried the Single Player mission "Battlefields", that req. 1Ghz+. And well it dident suprise me how slow my computer is, I got 2-3 FPS on my AMD XP2400+ @ 2.1Ghz, 1024MB (overclocked), Radeon 9800 Pro (overklocked). So I guess my overclockning might have screwed up my system. It usually does that to me, so I'm going to format and reinstall. But just for fun, lets see your FPS in the mission "Battlefields". I'm sure there are those with weaker system that will have much more FPS then I have! So show em, and dont forget to mention your hardware! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
4 IN 1 0 Posted December 25, 2005 i got a pc quite like yours yet i still get 10+ FPS, maybe is your video card settings? XP2500+, 1024MB ram, Radeon 9800 Pro non-o/c get AA off for DXDLL mod using ECP 1085 view 1500-2000 other settings on highest Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mister Frag 0 Posted December 25, 2005 My FPS are generally in the 30s in that mission, but goes above 220 when looking through a sniper scope. P4D 840EE, 1GB RAM, GF 6800GT, 1600x1200 (the native LCD resolution). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
llauma 0 Posted December 25, 2005 As OFP is very scalable you need to post more about the OFP settings you are playing with. Post the info from the flashpoint config and these parts from the user config: <table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td>Code Sample </td></tr><tr><td id="CODE">frameRate="30.000000"; visualQuality=0.020495; objectShadows=0; vehicleShadows=0; viewDistance=500.000061; terrainGrid=50.000000; I suggest you to check the total memory in the OFP preferences. If you haven't changed it since you got the extra 512mb RAM it will most likely still be set at the game using 512mb at most. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mister Frag 0 Posted December 25, 2005 Post the info from the flashpoint config and these parts from the user config: Good idea. <table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td>Code Sample </td></tr><tr><td id="CODE">frameRate=10.000000; visualQuality=0.005000; objectShadows=1; vehicleShadows=1; cloudlets=1; viewDistance=1536.148071; terrainGrid=50.000000; Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PriMo_ 0 Posted December 25, 2005 aah, thanks. Guess that explains alittle. Still as my harddrive is getting full and I got alot of crap from previous installations that I'll better make a complete format. ^^ But thanks for the info, and when I'm done and have installed OFP again, I'm going to return here and tell if there have happen anything with my FPS. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
eestikas88 0 Posted December 25, 2005 <table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td>Code Sample </td></tr><tr><td id="CODE">frameRate=30.000000; visualQuality=0.005000; objectShadows=0; vehicleShadows=0; cloudlets=1; viewDistance=1007.573608; terrainGrid=12.500000; yay! although i get around 12 fps in this mission i got radeon 9600. 512 ram. dunno about the processor,it should be xp2400 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mister Frag 0 Posted December 25, 2005 The greater terrain detail is probably hurting you. Too much detail tends to look unrealistic, and the CPU power and memory required to manager it slows everything down. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
codarl 1 Posted December 25, 2005 The greater terrain detail is probably hurting you.Too much detail tends to look unrealistic, and the CPU power and memory required to manager it slows everything down. Though it's nice for infantry, to see armour struggling to get trough a normal wasteland can be... a bit.. erm... weird. indeed. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PriMo_ 0 Posted December 26, 2005 Well I have reinstalled now. *horraay more space to put more ofp addons in* It did not make any super performance hit, but after looking at others config files, I see I was rather spoiled at 2000+ in viewrange. ^^ I tested the same settings as eestikas88 and got around 15-18 FPS. The rest I blame for the bad coding I guess. ;P Oh well, you cant have it all. :edit: and those FPS above is when my comp is not overclocked! I'm going to overclock right away now to see if I can press it over 20+ FPS. :edit2: okey, I have overclocked now to the same I had before reinstallation, and I get around 18-23 FPS. Even that the settings has been slided down, I still thinks this is better then 2-3 FPS. ^^ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites