Icabola 0 Posted January 19, 2002 I bought this game yesterday..and I was hoping that this game that use Quake III tech will have a better features than its predecessor or competitor (RTCW - Return to Castle Wolf)...with 2CDs...oh man this game is really disaster.....never thought that EA publish this game.....with a huge coverage in gamespot etc ....still OFP is the best. With my PC specs :(maximum setting 1024x768@32bit) Intel PIV 2.0Ghz (1.8Ghz@2.0Hgz i850 Asus socket 478 512MB RDRAM Mushkin PC800 Asus v8200 GeForce 3 64MB 3.8ns Barracuda 40GB ATA100 @7200rpm Win2000 DirectX 8.1 this game has final review (my review): Value : 1/5 Graphics: 2/5 Gameplay : 2/5 Storyline : 3/5 Sound : 2/5 Ingame cinematics : 0/5 Overall: 1.5/5 (Absymal) Again there is no game to compare with OFP!! Regards, Icabola Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Black Op 0 Posted January 19, 2002 if u gave moh 2/5 for graphics ofp must get -5 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Icabola 0 Posted January 19, 2002 I just dont understand why the graphics so poor (MOH) ....even with my GeForce 3 all (latest Nvidia driver + DirectX 8.1) max settings........the polygons of the weapons .....sucks..(compare to RTCW/MaxPayne/Ghost Recon)....the environment, the textures etc....also sucks But i have to honest to myself the graphics of OFP can only have rating 4/5 (max) knowing that the polygons of the soldier are so few. regards, Icabola Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Thehamster 0 Posted January 19, 2002 I have only played the demo and I think the graphics are really good as well as the effects in the game. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Posted January 19, 2002 I htought it was avery fun game, although not realistsic, the graphics fitted the time and the atmos. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
