raedor 8 Posted September 9, 2003 does anybody know, whether a line like this one:<table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td>Code Sample </td></tr><tr><td id="CODE">@variableneeds as much ressources as this one:<table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td>Code Sample </td></tr><tr><td id="CODE">#loop ? variable: goTo "xy" goTo "loop" or maybe in which delay an "@" asks after the variable? 0.01 seconds? cos i think that a "@" cant be more than a loop with a short delay. isnt it? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BraTTy 0 Posted September 9, 2003 Whenever I have used @ pauses...I notice considerable cpu usage compared to a loop with a delay I see some loops with no delays,this is not recommended Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
denoir 0 Posted September 9, 2003 This should probably be in mission editing. But anyway: Suma once commented on this and IIRC he said that a loop with a very short pause was preferable to the @ operator. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ralphwiggum 6 Posted September 9, 2003 moving to mission editting. AFAIK, SUMA answered this question some months ago. '@' uses more resources since it is checked every 0.00001 second or so. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
