PlaneShifter 0 Posted November 29, 2001 Less CPU? Better FPS? Go in your user config file, set the framerate to 120, and stay away from the video pref. screen in-game ^_^ - PlaneShifter - Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RN Malboeuf 12 Posted November 29, 2001 yes there is the fact that Frag has mostly AI Populated maps OFP cannot just lower it's CPU load, it's not like other games, there are more AI/player tasks, take for exaple, we can see where a player/AI is looking while he's using the look mode (*) there are meny more such add ons, you cannot compair OFP to Q3 or CS also you stated that your running on a Deul proceesor, is OFP Ded server really using both? head over to http://techtv.com and go in to the screen savers site and you'll find a program for testing to see if you are using both at any given time I've used Radish server allot and have played 20vs20 many times, hours on end really (have not been home in the last week to beable to play) The only map I've had problems with is the Vehicle Desart map with that many players, we all tend to die and crash when we're in the air in choppers/planes Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BigQEd 0 Posted November 29, 2001 Malboeuf... The ONLY map you would have played on ours that has 20+ slots available (until recently) would have been the Mission that I made... Rescue Randolph. And as I have stated that missions was VERY INTESIVE with choppers all over the map. I have since tweaked the mission and now it seems much smoother. We are able to play with 20+. Just some missions with Choppers and such are hogs and kill OFP. Also you mentioned SMP... no OFP is not utilizing the full potential of Dual Processors. BIS do you plan to have a setting for this like Q3? TechTV... LOL... ROFLMAO... they are a consumer informant and thus are dumbed down. (Edited by BigQEd at 10:11 pm on Nov. 29, 2001) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RN Malboeuf 12 Posted November 29, 2001 thats why I posted the link to them, you said that OFP works fast becasue you have the s**e r on a Dual Processor when in fact most all ready knew it did not suport it. if you want to talk to BIS about it don't post it here, send it to the Support Email here on this site under the FAQ page Best get your Server on a real system like a Athlon XP Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BigQEd 0 Posted November 29, 2001 LOL... thats a funny statement: Best get your Server on a real system like a Athlon XP You should revise it to say: Best get your OFP Server on a system it likes, like a Athlon XP Because I can tell you most servers run much better with high end Dual Pentium Processors. i.e. Web and Email servers. XP is optional... however their does seem to be a little better SMP with XP. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
WisdoM 1 Posted November 30, 2001 AMD is not really good on servers, thats the only good thing I can say about Intel. I'd never put one of thoise in my PC, but If I built a server it would def. be a Dually Intel :biggrin: BigEd as far as their SMP being a "little" better, thats an understatement. AMD just doesnt ,market as well. But AMD's newest XP 1900+ smokes teh P4 2.0GHz In EVERY test. Now I'm not sure about when teh Northwood 2.2GHz is out(ETA Jan.7, 2002) but then aain teh TBred will prob. beat that Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RN Malboeuf 12 Posted November 30, 2001 to Eddy >>>>Best get your OFP Server on a system it likes, like a Athlon XP muhahahahahah Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
