Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
killagee

Gripen

Recommended Posts

Guest

Still looks sweet though smile.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe that's the protorype textures. The Gripens in service are painted in low-vis gray.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (smogmorph @ Mar. 18 2003,16:50)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">gripen.jpg

Model looks good, but the textures are way off  confused.gif<span id='postcolor'>

On this pic it's a two seater confused.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (chaztheducky @ Mar. 18 2003,23:39)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">the griphen is only a 1 person fighter isint it?<span id='postcolor'>

A-version: 1-seater

B-version: 2-seater

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

knew it! biggrin.gif so its like a f-18...f-18c=1 seat...f-18g(d mabye forget the name of the two seater)=2 seats(woops already said that tounge.gif ). anyhoo im looking foward to the single seater version and mabye the double biggrin.gif .

o.t. james in japenese is ja-me-su biggrin.gif

its funny huh? biggrin.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Complex studies were carried out during the selection processes for the SAAF, RAAF, the Chiliean Air force and for Poland. All seperate studies concluded that the Jas-39C (export version) was the best value for money of any multi-role fighter around. Unfortunately only the SAAF bought it. The aussies selected the Joint Strike Fighter, even though the Gripen scored higher in every catergory when price is considered. The Gripen even offered 40% better local industry offset deals. They said they the JAS_39 was omitted cause the RAAF needed twin engine fighters for over-sea operation. Anyone ever seen a twin engine F-35? didnt think so...

Yeah, low vis textures would be better.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (killagee @ Mar. 19 2003,17:28)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Complex studies were carried out during the selection processes for the SAAF, RAAF, the Chiliean Air force and for Poland. All seperate studies concluded that the Jas-39C (export version) was the best value for money of any multi-role fighter around. Unfortunately only the SAAF bought it. The aussies selected the Joint Strike Fighter, even though the Gripen scored higher in every catergory when price is considered. The Gripen even offered 40% better local industry offset deals. They said they the JAS_39 was omitted cause the RAAF needed twin engine fighters for over-sea operation. Anyone ever seen a twin engine F-35? didnt think so...

Yeah, low vis textures would be better.<span id='postcolor'>

The RAAF selected the JSF for it's V/STOL ability as well, to complement projected amphibious assault ship purchases - and because of greater stealth characteristics. We are also being rather pro-American in an effort to secure a free-trade agreement with the U.S. sad.gif

Anyhoo, the model looks ripper - not too 'clean' as some addons tend to be....you'd expect military equipment to have a certain 'used' look...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

True enough Mr Snrub. Apparently though the RAAF are looking at the CTOL version of the F-35.

My fav for the RAAF was the EF-2000 with conformal fuel tanks and Tranche 3 Export Software. Mmmm....

smile.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×