Official BIS End game servers should have consistent max player count

[digitalgeo 21]

It is unfair when a full official server switches from a 32 player End game to a 20 player End Game mission during round change, as players have to fight over slots.

In a full server, 32 players should not have to fight over 20 slots, as it forces the other 12 unslotted players to leave. As a result when the server changes to a 32 player game again, the server is not full.

It can be suggested that one official server should host all the 32 player End Games, while the other official server hosts all the 20 player End games. 
This way max player counts are consistent, people don't fight over slots during mission change, and servers remain full longer.

 

Play on Official BIS End Game server and wait for when mission ends. When it switches to a new mission, theres a chance a 32 player mission changes to a 20 player mission. If the server is full, and it changes from a 32 to 20 player mission, 12 players are left out.

[Oric-1 4]

Yes I totally agree; it is really annoying when you have no choice but to disconnect because when the mission changes there are only 16 slots and 26 players are on the server.

I think BI have underestimated their own gamemode and are not supporting it very well. The one official server that doesn't keep disappearing is becoming popular and is slowly rising through a sea of waste-of-a-life-on-a-hill (with zombies) servers:

http://www.gametracker.com/server_info/109.236.82.30:2402/

Would be nice to have a sub forum for End game like there is for Zeus. It feels like BI have moved on from End game. Will End game even be available to play on Tanoa?

[digitalgeo 21]

There is, BIS announced recently :D