ArmA3 review thread

[garbol87 10]

Sonce it's offically relased we can start to gather the reviews and see what the press thinks of ArmA3.

GOL (gry-online.pl): 6.5/10

Pros:

+Altis island;

+helpful tools in the editor;

+animations and enhanced capabilities of soldier movements;

+finally present ragdoll;

+integration with Steam Workshop;

+artwork is impressive;

+AI is a little better than in ArmA2;

Cons:

-lack of a more realistic solutions to the vehicles;

-PhysX still not quite working properly;

-Not too many missions;

-No improvements in the interface;

-bugs occasionally amuse or annoy;

Let's see how the rest of it goes.

finnal thought of the reviewr in google-translate:

I tested the new work of Bohemia for months and the final version created in me a very extreme emotions. From the initial enthusiasm "leap of civilization", which made ​​a new installment in the series in a number of technical-gameplay issues, the shortcomings of content provided by developer. ArmA III is not a typical shooter, which is disqualified by lack of many hours of campaign , left as a being living through the community. However, there is no doubt that players would prefer to be based on something more when creating mods or mission. Therefore ArmA III, rather than bear the name of a sensational game, must be content with that it's being shuffled as a promising game, which no game should aim at launch.

EDIT: amde it a bit clearer whit google-translate.

Edited September 12, 2013 by Garbol87

[PuFu 4600]

what is wrong with this thread?:

http://forums.bistudio.com/showthread.php?119218-Latest-quot-ARMA-3-quot-Press-Coverage-NO-discussion-here!

[garbol87 10]

Sorry didn't saw it.