Chopper landing gear!

[WKK Gimbal 0]

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Aaron Kane @ June 30 2002,05:17)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Hmm... at low levels, it might make sense for a helicopter to keep its gear down, just in case of it crashing or having to make an emergency landing.  Of course, it doesnt make sense when flying high, but on a NOE mission, why not?

In fact... I think it would be really cool if they made it so that the landing gear AUTOMATICALLY RETRACTED ONCE YOU GO ABOVE A CERTAIN HEIGHT!!!!!!!

Could you imagine the look on little Sancho's face when he sees his favorite assault chopper move its gear?  That might be enough to make an 10 year old hit puberty prematurely!

And as an added bonus, you could pick up garbage in the wheel wells of the helicopter, and carry it back to base.  Then you could make the garbage into cyborgs.

If you are bold or bald, the Hind could carry more hair for you.  It happens all the time.  I live in Russia.  My profile is lieing.  I live in Moscow.  My dad was bald until the Hind gave him hair.  I want to be a Hind when I grow up.

*dies*<span id='postcolor'>

That's poetry

[Sadico 1]

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">As for screwing up all the Russian stuff, there's no need to go off like a frog in a sock...there could be any number of reasons BIS didn't implement these, and in the end does it really make any difference to gameplay or fun?

<span id='postcolor'>

Yes, having guided ATGM's in the T-80 would make a HUGE difference in gameplay, as having a realistic gau-8 in the A-10 would make a huge difference too. The landing gear in the Hind should be fixed because it's a realism issue. Also, the chopper looks better with the landing gear retracted I'm sure that if they released a rah-66 comanche you all would start whining because it doesn't have retractable landing gear and weapons bay.